|
|
||||||||
AJPH NEWS Release
EMBARGOED UNTIL March 29, 2005, 4 PM (ET)
CONTACT: For copies of articles, call Natalie Raynor, (202) 777-2511
All articles will be online under "First Look" at
www.ajph.org following the embargo.
American Journal of Public Health Highlights
· Trauma of Hurricane Katrina evacuees underscores need
for better disaster preparedness
· Living in a race-conscious society take health toll on
American blacks
· Rise in U.S. C-sections not due to rise in moms' risk
factors
· Smokeless tobacco use has dropped dramatically among
nation's youth
The articles below are published online by the American Journal of Public Health under "First Look," and will appear in the May 2006 print issue of the Journal, with the exception of the article by Brodie, which will appear in a future print issue. "First Look" articles have undergone peer review, copyediting and approval by authors, but have not yet been printed to paper or posted online by issue. Following the embargo, articles will appear under "First Look" at www.ajph.org/first_look.shtml. The American Journal of Public Health is published by the American Public Health Association and is available at www.ajph.org.
Trauma of Hurricane Katrina evacuees underscores
need for better disaster preparedness
Many Hurricane Katrina Evacuees suffered emotional trauma during
and after the storm, underscoring the need for better public health
preparedness.
In a survey of 680 evacuees living in Houston-area shelters, researchers
found most were poor, black and uninsured, a population already
struggling when the storm devastated their homes. To make matters
worse, many suffered from chronic health problems such as diabetes
and heart disease and relied on the New Orleans public hospital
system for care. When Katrina destroyed that system, many evacuees
had no fallback plan when it came to health care.
The survey of 680 randomly selected evacuees was conducted in
mid-September 2005 and was jointly designed by the Washington
Post, Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University School of
Public Health. More than 90 percent of survey evacuees were black,
compared to New Orleans' 69-perecnt black population. And 54 percent
of evacuees were uninsured, compared to a 26-percent uninsurance
rate in Louisiana.
"The results make clear the vulnerable situation facing victims
of hurricane Katrina, confirming the trends found in previous
disasters," the study's authors said. "The results also
shed light on critical policy choices facing public health officials
and policymakers
in the Gulf Coast and across the nation. In particular, the survey
illuminates the challenge facing disaster planners in effectively
evacuating cities' most at-risk residents, and the challenge of
providing for the long-term health care needs of a vulnerable
population in the face of a future natural or man-made disaster."
[From: "Experiences of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees: Findings
from a Survey of Evacuees in Houston Area Shelters." Contact:
Mollyann Brodie, PhD, Kaiser Family Foundation, mbrodie@kff.org.]
Living in a race-conscious society make take health toll
on American blacks
The health of American blacks appears to be worse than that of
whites regardless of income, and researchers think living in a
race-conscious society may be at least partly to blame.
Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, researchers
examined allostatic load scores for adults ages 18-64 and estimated
probability of a high score by age, rage, gender and poverty status.
The study's authors also estimated blacks' odds of having a high
score relative to whites' odds. They found blacks had higher scores,
indicating worse health, at all ages and particularly at 35-64
years. Racial differences were not explained by poverty.
"We found evidence that racial inequalities in health exist
across a range of biological systems among adults and are not
explained by racial differences in poverty," the study's
authors said. "The weathering effects of living in a race-conscious
society may be greatest among those [b]lacks most likely to engage
in high-effort coping."
[From: "'Weathering' and Age Patterns of Allostatic Load
Scores Among Blacks and Whites in the United States." Contact:
Arline T. Geronimus, ScD, University of Michigan School of Public
Health, Ann Arbor, arline@umich.edu.]
Rise in U.S. C-sections not due to rise in moms' risk factors
More than one-fourth of all first-time mothers in the United States
deliver their babies by cesarean section, and the recent rise
in the nation's C-section rate can't be attributed to rising risk
factors among mothers.
Using national birth certificate data from 1991 through 2002,
researchers analyzed both the overall C-section rate as well as
the primary rate for first-time mothers. While the primary C-section
rate actually dropped between 1991 and 1996, it shot up in the
remaining study years, accounting for about 53 percent of all
C-sections. As concerns about the safety of vaginal births after
C-section rose, overall C-section rates rose as well. The increasing
rate was not attributed to higher risk factors among mothers.
The study's author said growing restrictions on VBACs, coupled
with the current rise in primary C-sections, will result in "a
large cohort of women in which repeat cesareans will become the
norm.
"More research is needed into the causes of these trends
since the growth in primary cesareans combined with increasing
restrictions on vaginal birth after cesareans will lead to a continuation
and likely acceleration of the current growth in the overall cesarean
rate in the U.S." [From: "The Rise in Primary Cesarean
Births in the U.S., 1991- 2002: Changing Risk Profiles or Changing
Practice?" Contact: Eugene R. Declercq, Boston University
School of Public Health, declercq@bu.edu.]
Smokeless tobacco use has dropped dramatically among nation's
youth.
The anti-tobacco message seems to have hit home among American
adolescents when it comes to smokeless tobacco. Smokeless tobacco
use between 1986 and 2003 was low among adolescent girls and remained
unchanged during the study period. [For 12th grade boys, it rose
slightly from 1986 until the early 1990s. From the mid-1990s to
2003, however, smokeless tobacco use among 8th, 10th, and 12th
grade boys dropped sharply, researchers found.] Anti-smoking advocates
caution that smokeless tobacco should not be considered an alternative
to cigarettes and that educational messages need to continue to
drive that point home.[From: Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Use among
Adults and Adolescents in the United States. Contact: David E.
Nelson, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office
on Smoking & Health, Atlanta, den2@cdc.gov.]
The American Journal of Public Health is the monthly journal of the American Public Health Association, the oldest organization of public health professionals in the world. APHA is a leading publisher of public health-related books and periodicals promoting high scientific standards, action programs and policy for good health. More information is available at www.apha.org.
####
To see previous news releases, visit our News Release Archive
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |