|
|
||||||||
AJPH
NEWS Release
EMBARGOED UNTIL March 30, 2004, 4:00 PM (ET)
CONTACT: For copies of articles, contact Natalie Raynor,
(202) 777-2511, natalie.raynor{at}apha.org
All articles are online at www.ajph.org
after the embargo.
To view the preliminary table of contents, visit www.ajph.org/future/94.4.shtml
American Journal of Public Health: April 2004 Highlights
The articles highlighted below appear in the April 2004 issue of the American Journal of Public Health, the Journal of the American Public Health Association.
____________________
Binge drinking a national problem
Binge drinking, defined as the consumption of five or more alcoholic
beverages on an occasion, generally results in acute impairment
and has numerous health consequences. While drinking is a problem
nationwide, the percent of U.S. adults who binge drink varies
substantially from one city to another.
According to a study of 120 metropolitan areas
in 48 states and the District of Columbia, the median binge-drinking
rate for metropolitan areas was 14.5 percent. The lowest rate
of 4.1 percent was recorded in Chattanooga, Tenn., and the highest
rate of 23.9 percent was recorded in San Antonio, Texas.
Using 1997 and 1999 federal survey data on almost 300,000 people, the researchers found that 17 of the 20 metropolitan areas with the highest binge drinking rates in the United States were located in the upper Midwest, Texas and Nevada. In 13 of these areas, at least one-third of 18- to 34- year-olds were binge drinkers.
The study's authors suggest addressing the binge
drinking problem by adopting such public health measures as increased
alcohol excise taxes, better enforcement of the minimum legal
drinking age and community-based programs that include education
and enforcement.
[From: "Metropolitan-Area
Estimates of Binge Drinking in the United States" Contact:
Bob Brewer, MD, MSPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Atlanta, rdb2{at}cdc.gov,
or Tim Naimi, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Atlanta tbn7{at}cdc.gov.]
Child abuse and neglect lead to costly hospitalizations
Child abuse and neglect aren't just emotionally costly.
A study of 636,802 hospital stays for children age 18 or under
showed when a child was hospitalized due to abuse or neglect,
the costs for the stay were double. Children hospitalized because
of abuse or neglect are also much more likely to die during the
hospitalization and have longer stays than other children.
The study, which used data from the 1999 Nationwide
Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project,
found that children who were hospitalized due to abuse or neglect
had an average of 6.3 diagnoses, compared with 2.8 for other children.
Four percent of abused or neglected children died during hospitalization,
compared with 0.5 percent of other children. The average total
charges for children hospitalized due to abuse or neglect were
$19,266 compared to $9,513 for other children. And the average
hospital stay for cases connected to abuse or neglect: 8.2 days.
Other children's stays averaged four days.
The study's authors said their estimates were
conservative because abuse and neglect cases often go unidentified,
but they pressed for further analysis of the diagnoses accompanying
abuse and neglect. "Our findings provide the economic rationale
for policies and programs to prevent child abuse and neglect,"
the authors wrote.
[From: "The Economic Burden of Hospitalization Associated With Child Abuse and Neglect." Contact: Sue L.D. Rovi, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, rovisl{at}umdnj.edu.]
Speed humps help protect children from accidents
Speed humps help make a child's environment safer, according
to a 5-year study of pediatric emergency department visits involving
children struck by an automobile. In a study of children seen
in the emergency department of Children's Hospital Oakland from
March 1, 1995-March 1, 2000, researchers found that those children
living on or near streets with speed humps were less likely to
be injured or killed by automobiles than children who lived on
streets without such speed humps. Living within a block of a speed
hump was associated with a roughly two-fold reduction in the odds
of injury within a child's neighborhood. Overall, living near
a speed hump was associated with a 53-60 percent reduction in
the odds of injury or death due to being struck by an automobile.
"These findings invite additional research
on the protective effects of traffic calming interventions,"
the study's authors said. "Our study provides direct observational
evidence that speed humps are associated with a reduction in the
odds of childhood pedestrian injuries and supports installation
of speed humps by traffic engineering departments."
[From: "A Matched Case-Control
Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Speed Humps in Reducing
Child Pedestrian Injuries." Contact: June M. Tester, MD,
MPH, Children's Hospital Oakland, junetester{at}post.harvard.edu.]
Middle-aged women just as likely to suffer abuse
A study of more than 90,000 women age 50-79 found that
abuse is a widespread problem in that age group.
Researchers found that 11.1 percent of the women
surveyed reported being the victim of verbal and/or physical abuse
at some time during the previous year. The study data came from
survey responses recorded for the Women's Health Initiative. Of
the 91,749 women responding to questions about abuse on the study,
10,199 reported being abused within the previous 12 months. Most
of the women in the survey were white, college-educated and married.
The findings suggest that older women are subject
to abuse at about the same rate as younger women, pointing to
a need for abuse screening across all age groups.
[From: "Prevalence and 3-Year
Incidence of Abuse Among Postmenopausal Women." Contact:
Charles P. Mouton, MD, MS, University of Texas Health Science
Center at San Antonio, mouton{at}uthscsa.edu.]
Polluted water linked to health problems among surfers
Researchers compared rates of reported health
symptoms among surfers in urban North Orange County and rural
Santa Cruz County during the winters of 1998 and 1999. The urban
surfers reported almost twice as many symptoms as the rural surfers
in the rainy winter of 1998. And during both study years, reported
symptoms increased by about 10 percent for each 2.5 hours of weekly
water exposure. The health symptoms included fever, nausea, stomach
pain, diarrhea, sore throat, eye redness and skin infection.
[From: "Health Effects Associated
With Recreational Coastal Water Use: Urban Versus Rural California."
Contact: Dean B. Baker, MD, MPH, University of California, Irvine
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, dbaker{at}uci.edu.] The American Journal of Public Health
is the monthly journal of the American Public Health Association,
the oldest and largest organization of public health professionals
in the world. APHA is a leading publisher of public health-related
books and periodicals promoting high scientific standards, action
programs and policy for good health. More information is available
at www.apha.org.
Discharging untreated urban runoff onto public beaches can pose
health risks, according to a study of hundreds of surfers at two
California beaches.
North Orange County was designated as the "urban"
site because its watershed is one of the most developed areas
of the world and generates highly polluted runoff waters. Santa
Cruz County was the "rural" site because of its coastal
water quality indicators and watershed characteristics.
"These potential health risks warrant greater
public health surveillance, as well as greater efforts to reduce
pollutants discharged on public beaches," the study's authors
said. "Large-scale prospective investigations are needed
to further characterize the health risks of people exposed to
untreated urban runoff in coastal waters."
To see previous news releases, visit our News Release Archive
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |