|
|
||||||||
AJPH
NEWS Release
EMBARGOED UNTIL February 3, 2004, 10:00 AM (ET)
CONTACT: For copies of articles, contact Natalie Raynor,
(202) 777-2511, natalie.raynor{at}apha.org
All articles are online at www.ajph.org
after the embargo.
To view the preliminary table of contents, visit www.ajph.org/future/94.2.shtml
American Journal of Public Health: February 2004 Highlights
The articles highlighted below appear in the February 2004 issue of the American Journal of Public Health, the Journal of the American Public Health Association.
____________________
Cigarettes getting more screen time in blockbuster
films
Cigarettes are back in vogue among movie characters, according
to a random sample of major motion pictures. While smoking in
movies declined from 10.7 incidents per hour in 1950 to 4.9 incidents
per hour in 1980-82, such incidents increased to 10.9 per hour
in 2002, with the most rapid increase starting in about 1991.
Smoking shown in movies has been linked to increased smoking among
teens. "Despite declining tobacco use and increasing public
health understanding of smoking in the real world, smoking in
movies has returned to levels observed in 1950, when smoking was
nearly twice as prevalent in reality as it was in 2000,"
the study's authors said. Researchers selected a random sample
of 20 of the top-grossing films released in the United States
between 1950 and 1959 and five of the top-grossing movies for
2001 and 2002. They compared this data to an earlier analysis
of films released in the 1980s and warned that giving more screen
time to cigarettes can have a long-term effect on the nation's
youth. "Particularly with the long shelf life that movies
gain through television rebroadcast, videotape and DVD, the pro-tobacco
influence of the high smoking levels in recent movies will continue
to be a pro-tobacco influence on teenagers for years to come unless
remedial action is taken."
[From: "Back to the Future:
Smoking in Movies in 2002 Returned to 1950 Levels." Contact:
Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, University of California, San Francisco,
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.]
Many Manhattan residents increased smoking and drinking
after September 11 attacks
The September 11 terrorist attacks caused many Manhattan
residents to smoke and drink more, a trend that could have long-term
psychological and physical health consequences. Researchers collected
data from two random-digit-dial surveys conducted one month and
six months following the attacks. In October 2001, almost 31 percent
of the 988 survey respondents reported increased use of cigarettes,
alcohol or marijuana, and the figure was 27 percent in March 2002.
"These sustained increases in substance use following the
September 11 terrorist attacks suggest potential long-term health
consequences as a result of disasters," the study's authors
said. They also said the issue warrants more study among the public
health community.
[From: "Sustained Increased
Consumption of Cigarettes, Alcohol, and Marijuana Among Manhattan
Residents After September 11, 2001." Contact: David Vlahov,
PhD, Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy
of Medicine, dvlahov{at}nyam.org.]
Prescription drug abuse a growing problem in America
Millions of Americans are at risk for abusing prescription
drugs, especially women, people in poor health and those who drink
alcohol daily. A study of data collected as part of the National
Household Study on Drug Abuse found that nearly 1.3 million Americans
are abusing prescription drugs. And more than 8 million report
non-medical use of prescription drugs each year. Researchers found
that single women age 35 and older are at increased risk of abusing
narcotic analgesics. Tranquilizers are more likely to be abused
by women, whites, people with at least a high-school education,
those in poor or fair health and those who drink alcohol daily.
For sedative-hypnotics, poor health increased the likelihood of
abuse, while yearly income of less than $40,000 reduced it. Past-year
illicit drug use actually reduced the odds of prescription drug
abuse.
[From: "Risk Factors Associated
With Problem Use of Prescription Drugs." Contact: Linda Simoni-Wastila,
PhD, University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Department of
Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, lsimoniw{at}rx.umaryland.edu.]
American Indian online cigarette sales present ethical
dilemma
Cheap and easily accessible cigarettes offered from American
Indian Web sites are becoming a larger part of the tobacco marketplace,
presenting an ethical dilemma among those working to improve the
health of American Indians/Alaska Natives. At least eight Indian
cigarette and tobacco product brands are sold on 33 Web sites,
according to a search of more than 1,000 sites using the search
term "American Indian cigarettes." State sales and excise
taxes are not added to the sales of these brands, and cigarette
sales revenues are a sizeable source of income for some tribes
and Indian entrepreneurs. A carton of cigarettes purchased online
can cost as little as one-fifth the amount charged at grocery
stores. "The changing pattern of smoking sales and new points
of purchase challenge researchers and educators to address this
new marketing ploy," the study's authors said, "and
to discover ways to curb rising smoking rates in Indian communities."
[From: "American Indian
Internet Cigarette Sales: Another Avenue for Selling Tobacco Products."
Contact: Felicia A. Hodge, DrPH, University of Minnesota Center
for American Indian Research and Education, hodge029{at}umn.edu.]
Restaurant smoking bans more likely in affluent neighborhoods
Local smoke-free restaurant ordinances are most likely to protect
the health of citizens living in more affluent neighborhoods,
according to a study of such measures in Massachusetts. Researchers
examined a state database of state restaurant smoking regulations
for each of Massachusetts' 351 cities and towns. Local smoke-free
restaurant ordinances were more likely to be adopted by towns
with a higher proportion of college graduates, a higher per capita
income, a lower percentage of non-Hispanic whites, a higher percentage
of foreign-born residents, medium-sized populations (20,000-50,000
residents) and a lower proportion of youths. Regulations also
were more likely in: towns in the Metrowest/Boston region; towns
where a higher percentage of voters supported a 1992 cigarette
tax initiative; towns where the local board of health was funded
to conduct clean indoor air policy efforts; and towns that bordered
another town with a strong restaurant smoking regulation. Healthy
People 2010 calls for the protection of every American from the
hazards of tobacco smoke exposure in restaurants.
[From: "Town-Level Characteristics
and Smoking Policy Adoption in Massachusetts: Are Local Restaurant
Smoking Regulations Fostering Disparities in Health Protection?"
Contact: Margie Skeer, MSW, MPH, Boston University School of Public
Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, skeer{at}bu.edu.]
The American Journal of Public Health is the monthly journal of the American Public Health Association, the oldest and largest organization of public health professionals in the world. APHA is a leading publisher of public health-related books and periodicals promoting high scientific standards, action programs and policy for good health. More information is available at www.apha.org.
to receive a complimentary subscription. Access to abstracts, news releases, and alerting services is free to all readers.-->