|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Practice |
1 University of Pennsylvania
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kvittes{at}jhsph.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
Persons under certain domestic violence restraining orders are prohibited by federal law from purchasing and possessing a firearm. We used administrative data from California to link 794426 restraining orders with 1388724 handgun purchase applications. We found that restrained persons were not a less law-abiding group in general, but they appeared to be repeatedly or serially abusive to intimate partners, and their handgun purchase rates were highest after their restraining orders expired.
Key Words: Injury/Emergency Care/Violence, Statistics/Evaluation/Research
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K A Vittes and S B Sorenson Restraining orders among victims of intimate partner homicide Inj. Prev., June 1, 2008; 14(3): 191 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |