AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 2, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.113381v1
98/2/238    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James G. Hodge
Amy Pulver
Matthew Hogben
Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya
Erin Fuse Brown
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. F.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113381


Government, Politics, and Law

Expedited Partner Therapy for Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Assessing the Legal Environment

James G. Hodge 1*, Amy Pulver 2, Matthew Hogben 2, Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya 1, Erin Fuse Brown 1

1 Center for Law and the Public's Health
2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jhodge{at}jhsph.edu.


   Abstract

An emerging alternative to traditional partner management for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) is expedited partner therapy (EPT), which involves the delivery of medications or prescriptions to STD patients for their partners without the clinical assessment of the partners.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently recommended EPT nationally in limited circumstances; however, its implementation may raise legal concerns. We analyzed laws relevant to the distribution of medications to persons with whom clinicians have not personally treated or established a relationship.

We determined that three fourths of states or territories either expressly permit EPT or do not expressly prohibit the practice. We recommend (1) expressly endorsing EPT through laws, (2) creating exceptions to existing prescription requirements, (3) increasing professional board or association support for EPT, and (4) supporting third-party payments for partners’ medications.

Key Words: Health Law, Health Policy, Health Professionals




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Is Expedited Partner Therapy for STIs Legal in Your State?
Journal Watch Women's Health, March 20, 2008; 2008(320): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association