AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Aug 29, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.090399v1
97/10/1900    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brownson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kreuter, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brownson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kreuter, M. W.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2006.090399


Research and Practice

The Effect of Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions That Promote Physical Activity to Health Departments

Ross C. Brownson 1*, Paula Ballew 1, Kathrin L. Brown 1, Michael B. Elliott 1, Debra Haire-Joshu 1, Gregory W. Heath 2, Matthew W. Kreuter 1

1 Saint Louis University School of Public Health
2 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: brownson{at}slu.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We explored the effect of disseminating evidence-based guidelines that promote physical activity on US health department organizational practices in the United States.

Methods. We implemented a quasi-experimental design was used to examine changes in the dissemination of suggested guidelines to promote physical activity (The Guide to Community Preventive Services) in 8 study states; the remaining states and the Virgin Islands served as the comparison group. Guidelines were disseminated through workshops, ongoing technical assistance, and the distribution of an institutional CD-ROM. The main evaluation tool was a pre- and postdissemination survey administered to state and local health department staffs (baseline n=154;follow-up n=124).

Results. After guidelines were disseminated through workshops, knowledge of and skill in 11 intervention-related characteristics increased from baseline to follow-up. Awareness-related characteristics tended to increase more among local respondents than among state participants. Intervention adoption and implementation showed a pattern of increase among state practitioners but findings were mixed among local respondents.

Conclusions. Our exploratory study provides several dissemination approaches that should be considered by practitioners as they seek to promote physical activity in the populations they serve.

Key Words: Exercise/Physical Activity, Health Policy, Health Professionals, Public Health Practice, Surveys







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association