AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print May 30, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.080770v1
98/2/278    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bluthenthal, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kral, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bluthenthal, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kral, A. H.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.080770


Research and Practice

Approval of Syringe Exchange Programs in California: Results From a Local Approach to HIV Prevention

Ricky N. Bluthenthal 1*, Keith G. Heinzerling 2, Rachel Anderson 3, Neil M. Flynn 3, Alex H. Kral 4

1 RAND
2 UCLA
3 UC Davis
4 RTI International

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rickyb{at}rand.org.


   Abstract

Objectives. We studied the effect of local approval of syringe exchange programs in California (through Assembly AB136) on program availability and performance.

Methods. We determined the number of active syringe exchange programs in California by conducting Internet searches and obtaining information from the state and from local programs. To track changes in program availability and performance between 2000 and 2002, we interviewed 24 program directors annually for 3 years about program characteristics, syringe exchange policies, law enforcement contact, and other issues. We conducted multivariate analyses to determine whether AB136 approval status was associated with changes in performance.

Results. Fifteen local governments (13 counties and 2 cities) enacted the new law by 2002, and operating syringe exchange programs increased from 24 to 35. The proportion of these programs that were not locally approved declined from 54% to 40%. No new approved programs were started in high-need counties. Total syringes exchanged increased by more than 1 million per year, average annual budgets increased by more than 50%, and police harassment of the program volunteers, clients, and operators declined. Improvements at approved syringe exchange programs accounted for these changes.

Conclusions. Statewide approval and funding appears necessary to further syringe exchange availability in California.

Key Words: Government, Health Law, Health Policy, HIV/AIDS, Statistics/Evaluation/Research, Drugs







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association