AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.071936v1
AJPH.2005.071936v2
97/3/470    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Valdis E. Krebs
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andre, M.
Right arrow Articles by McElroy, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andre, M.
Right arrow Articles by McElroy, P. D.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071936


Research and Practice

Transmission Network Analysis to Complement Routine Tuberculosis Contact Investigations

McKenzie Andre 1, Kashef Ijaz 1, Jon D. Tillinghast 2, Valdis E. Krebs 3, Lois A. Diem 1, Beverly Metchock 1, Theresa Crisp 2, Peter D. McElroy 1*

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2 Oklahoma State Department of Health
3 orgnet.com

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pgm9{at}cdc.gov.


   Abstract

Objective.We examined the feasibility and value of network analysis to complement routine tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation procedures during an outbreak. Methods. We reviewed hospital, health department, and jail records and interviewed TB patients. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were genotyped. We evaluated contacts of TB patients for latent TB infection (LTBI) and TB, and analyzed routine contact investigation data, including tuberculin skin test (TST) results. Outcomes included number of contacts identified, number of contacts evaluated, and their TST status. We used network analysis visualizations and metrics (reach, degree, betweenness) to characterize the outbreak. Results. The index patient was symptomatic for 8 months and was linked to 37 secondary TB patients and more than 1200 contacts. Genotyping detected a 21- band pattern of a strain W variant. No HIV-infected patients were diagnosed. Contacts prioritized by network analysis were more likely to have LTBI than nonprioritized contacts (odds ratio=7.8; 95% confidence interval=1.6, 36.6). Network visualizations and metrics highlighted patients central to sustaining the outbreak and helped prioritize contacts for evaluation. Conclusions. A network-informed approach to TB contact investigations provided a novel means to examine large quantities of data and helped focus TB control.

Key Words: Community Health, Epidemiology, Tuberculosis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association