AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Mar 29, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.071720v1
AJPH.2005.071720v2
96/11/1927    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blandon, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blandon, M. M.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071720


Health Policy and Ethics

Patient Privacy and Conflicting Legal and Ethical Obligations in El Salvador: Reporting of Unlawful Abortions

Heathe Luz McNaughton 1*, Ellen M.H. Mitchell 2, Emilia G. Hernandez 3, Karen Padilla 4, Marta Maria Blandon 4

1 School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2 Ipas, Chapel Hill NC
3 Hospital Primero de Mayo, San Salvador, El Salvador
4 Ipas Central America, Managua Nicaragua

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcnaught{at}email.unc.edu.


   Abstract

Postabortion care providers who breach patient confidentiality endanger women's health and violate ethics. A 1998 abortion ban in El Salvador likely spurred an increase in the number of women investigated, because many women were reported to legal authorities by health care providers.

Having analyzed safeguards of confidentiality in laws and ethical guidelines, we describe from legal records women prosecuted from 1998 to 2003 and identified factors that may lead to reporting through a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists (n=110).

Although ethical and human rights standards oblige providers to respect patients' privacy, 80% of obstetrician-gynecologists mistakenly believed reporting was required. Most respondents (86%) knew that women delay seeking care because of fear of prosecution, yet a majority (56%) participated in notification of legal authorities.

Key Words: Abortion, Global Health, Health Law, Access to Care, Human Rights, Public Health Workers







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association