|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Health Matters |
1 MIT
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jsterman{at}mit.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
Policies to promote public health and welfare often fail or worsen the problems they are intended to solve. Evidence-based learning should prevent such policy resistance, but learning in complex systems is often weak and slow. Complexity hinders our ability to discover the delayed and distal impacts of interventions, generating unintended "side effects." Yet learning often fails even when strong evidence is available: common mental models lead to erroneous but self-confirming inferences, allowing harmful beliefs and behaviors to persist and undermining implementation of beneficial policies.
Here I show how systems thinking and simulation modeling can help expand the boundaries of our mental models, enhance our ability to generate and learn from evidence, and catalyze effective change in public health and beyond.
Key Words: Health Policy, Health Promotion, Health Service Delivery, Statistics/Evaluation/Research
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Auchincloss and A. V. Diez Roux A New Tool for Epidemiology: The Usefulness of Dynamic-Agent Models in Understanding Place Effects on Health Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2008; 168(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Candib Obesity and Diabetes in Vulnerable Populations: Reflection on Proximal and Distal Causes Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 547 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |