Laura M. Beskow ^1*, Robert S. Sandler ¹, Morris Weinberger ¹

¹ University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: laura_beskow{at}unc.edu.

	Abstract

Cancer registries are a valuable resource for recruiting participants for public health-oriented research, although such recruitment raises potentially competing concerns about patient privacy and participant accrual.

We surveyed US central cancer registries about their policies for research contact with patients, and results showed substantial variation. The strategy used most frequently (37.5% of those that allowed patient contact), which was among the least restrictive, was for investigators to notify patients' physicians and then contact patients with an opt-out approach. The most restrictive strategy was for registry staff to obtain physician permission and contact patients with an opt-in approach.

Population-based studies enhance cancer control efforts, and registry policies can affect researchers' ability to conduct such studies. Further discussion about balanced recruitment approaches that protect patient privacy and encourage beneficial research is needed.

Key Words: Cancer, Epidemiology, Ethics, Health Law, Health Policy, Statistics/Evaluation/Research

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. Snyder, R. Sloane, D. Lobach, I. M. Lipkus, B. Peterson, W. Kraus, and W. Demark-Wahnefried Differences in Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes at 1- and 2-Year Follow-up of Cancer Survivors Accrued via Self-Referral versus Cancer Registry in the FRESH START Diet and Exercise Trial Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1288 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Ness and for the Joint Policy Committee, Societies of Epide Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on Health Research JAMA, November 14, 2007; 298(18): 2164 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]