HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2007.125336v1 98/2/197    most recent Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schuklenk, U. Articles by Kleinsmidt, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schuklenk, U. Articles by Kleinsmidt, A. Related Collections Ethics HIV/AIDS Sexual Health

Udo Schuklenk, PhD and Anita Kleinsmidt, LLM

Udo Schuklenk is with the Department of Philosophy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario. Anita Kleinsmidt is an attorney in South Africa.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Udo Schuklenk, PhD, Department of Philosophy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada (e-mail: udo.schuklenk@gmail.com).

	Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

We thank Groves et al. for their constructive, critical comments. Our paper acknowledges that compulsory HIV testing regimes might deter pregnant women from seeking antenatal care. At this point in time, we do not know whether this actually would be the case, or, if it did act as a deterrent, how many women might be deterred from seeking antenatal care (this kind of cost—as determined by the relevant regulatory authorities—would have to be balanced against lives saved). Our article proposed a pilot study designed to investigate this question, among others.

All other things being equal, voluntary counseling and testing is . . . [Full Text]