|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MATERNAL AND INFANT HEALTH IN DIVERSE SETTINGS |
At the time of writing, Udo Schuklenk was with the Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland. Anita Kleinsmidt was with the Bioethics Division, Witwatersrand University Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Udo Schuklenk, PhD, Department of Philosophy, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (e-mail: udo.schuklenk{at}gmail.com).
ABSTRACT
We analyzed the ethical and policy issues surrounding mandatory HIV testing of pregnant women in areas with high HIV prevalence rates. Through this analysis, we seek to demonstrate that a mandatory approach to testing and treatment has the potential to significantly reduce perinatal transmission of HIV and defend the view that mandatory testing is morally required if a number of conditions can be met.
If such programs are to be introduced, continuing medical care, including highly active antiretroviral therapy, must be provided and pregnant women must have reasonable alternatives to compulsory testing and treatment. We propose that a liberal regime entailing abortion rights up to the point of fetal viability would satisfy these requirements.
Pilot studies in the high-prevalence region of southern African countries should investigate the feasibility of this approach.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Groves, M. W. Pierce, and S. Maman QUESTIONING MANDATORY HIV TESTING DURING PREGNANCY Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 196 - 197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |