AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Dec 28, 2006
February 2007, Vol 97, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 199-200
© 2007 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.102962
SUBA RESPONDS
Eric J. Suba, MD
The author is with the Viet/American Cervical Cancer Prevention Project, San Francisco, Calif, and with Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Eric J. Suba, MD, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 1200 El Camino Real, South San Francisco, CA 94080 (e-mail: eric.suba@kp.org).
 |
 |
| Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
"Feasibility" refers to that which is possible, in addition to that which is operational, successful, or sustained. Papanicolaou screening is feasible anywhere cervical screening is appropriate, because it is not appropriate to screen for cancer among communities without access to curative treatment services, and because communities with access to curative treatment will also have access to cytology laboratories. Papanicolaou screening is the only preventive option currently available for public sector control of cervical cancer in developing countries.1 Because future screening programs based on alternative screening tests will require cytology as an essential triage component, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), . . . [Full Text]
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association