|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LETTER |
Kerry L. Knox is with the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine and Eric D. Caine is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Kerry L. Knox, PhD, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 644, Rochester, NY 14642 (e-mail: kerry_knox@urmc.rochester.edu).
|
|||
We agree with Sorenson and Miller that firearms control in the United States has significant potential public health implicationsfor self-inflicted injury and suicide, homicide, and accidental injury. We also recognize the substantial social, cultural, and political implications of any public healthoriented discussion about firearms, a discussion that is likely to continue for many years into the future.1
While there is some indication that restriction of firearms in the homes of adolescents with previous histories of self-harm may be effective in reducing the risk of suicide,2 the focus of our article was to move priority-setting discussions beyond consideration of death rates
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |