AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Mar 29, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2004.057273v1
96/5/906    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pechmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reibling, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pechmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reibling, E. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Health
Right arrow Drugs
Right arrow Tobacco Control
May 2006, Vol 96, No. 5 | American Journal of Public Health 906-913
© 2006 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057273


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Antismoking Advertisements for Youths: An Independent Evaluation of Health, Counter-Industry, and Industry Approaches

Cornelia Pechmann, PhD, MS, MBA and Ellen T. Reibling, PhD, MA

Cornelia Pechmann is with the Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine. Ellen T. Reibling is with the Department of Health Education, University of California, Irvine.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Cornelia Pechmann, PhD, MS, MBA, Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: cpechman{at}uci.edu).

Objectives. We used a validated copy test method to examine the effectiveness of 8 types of antismoking advertisements representing health, counterindustry, and industry approaches. We tested the hypothesis that health ads about tobacco victims can lower most adolescents’ intent to smoke if the ads elicit disgust and anti-industry feelings rather than fear. We hypothesized null effects for adolescents with conduct disorder because of their abnormally low empathy.

Methods. Ninth-grade students from 8 California public schools (n=1725) were randomly assigned to view 1 of 9 videotapes containing a TV show with ads that included either a set of antismoking ads or a set of control ads. Participants completed baseline measures assessing personality traits and postexposure measures assessing smoking intent, feelings, beliefs, and ad evaluations.

Results. Ads focusing on young victims suffering from serious tobacco-related diseases elicited disgust, enhanced anti-industry motivation, and reduced intent to smoke among all but conduct-disordered adolescents. Counterindustry and industry ads did not significantly lower smoking intention.

Conclusions. Sponsors of tobacco use prevention ad campaigns should consider using ads showing tobacco-related disease and suffering, not just counterindustry ads. Ads should be copy tested before airing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
D. E. Apollonio and R. E. Malone
Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising
Health Educ. Res., October 23, 2008; (2008) cyn046v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C. Edwards, W. Oakes, and D. Bull
Out of the smokescreen II: will an advertisement targeting the tobacco industry affect young people's perception of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke?
Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association