|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
At the time of the study, the authors were with the Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jeralynn Sittig Cossman, PhD, Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work, PO Box C, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762 (e-mail: lynne.cossman{at}msstate.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We explored how place shapes mortality by examining 35 consecutive years of US mortality data. Mapping age-adjusted county mortality rates showed both persistent temporal and spatial clustering of high and low mortality rates. Counties with high mortality rates and counties with low mortality rates both experienced younger population out-migration, had economic decline, and were predominantly rural. These mortality patterns have important implications for proper research model specification and for health resource allocation policies.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The location of many counties with low mortality in the Upper Great Plains was an unexpected result. Despite economic decline and rapid outmigration, it was the healthiest region. In contrast, portions of the South, such as the southeastern United States, Appalachia, and the Mississippi Delta, had an expected pattern of high mortality while experiencing similar levels of population loss and economic contraction.
Our results extend analyses of general patterns of persistent clusters of mortality by another 5 years and mimic the spatial concentration of US mortality from previous time periods.6 This spatial autocorrelation (i.e., that those places close together are more similar than those that are far apart7) can be useful in analysis, but it violates the assumption of independent observations. Spatial autocorrelation that is not accounted for creates biased estimates and spurious significance levels.8
The United States has a persistent geographic pattern of county-level mortality rates spanning at least 35 years, consistent with earlier research.9 Mapping shows that these patterns have persisted despite regional population restructuring, advances in medicine, and policies aimed at alleviating socioeconomic inequality. Most interesting is the counterintuitive overlap in the sociodemographic characteristics of many counties with high or low mortality rates. Research on counties with high or low mortality indicated that a correlation exists between the percentage of Black people living in a county and high mortality rates in a county, but it is not particularly strong. No correlation was found between the percentage of Native Americans living in a county and counties with high mortality; the percentage of persons living in poverty in a county and outmigration rates also do not correlate highly.6
These findings underscore the importance of further investigation of "people versus place" in the study of mortality. Do population characteristics or environmental characteristics lead to spatial concentrations of mortality rates? Further analyses of other potential covariates may shed further light on the topic, but these results indicate that spatial autocorrelation must be explained by ecological mortality models. Policymakers also should be informed about where best to direct limited resources to specific unhealthy regions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We would like to thank Debra Street and 3 anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of the brief.
Note. The contents of this brief are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Rural Health Policy.
Human Participant Protection
No protocol approval was needed for this study.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Contributors
J. S. Cossman assisted in the analysis and led the writing of the brief. R. E. Cossman directed the calculations, mapping, and spatial analysis. W. L. James assisted in the calculation of mortality rates and mapped the results. C. R. Campbell assisted in the calculation of mortality rates and edited and formatted the brief. T. C. Blanchard assisted in the calculation and analysis of mortality rates and spatial patterns. A. G. Cosby originated the study and provided guidance.
Accepted for publication August 25, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. LeClere FB, Rogers RG, Peters K. Neighborhood social context and racial differences in womens heart disease mortality. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39:91–107.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Compressed Mortality File. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/elec_prods/subject/mcompres.htm. Accessed April 10, 2006.
4. James WL, Cossman RE, Cossman JS, Campbell C, Blanchard T. A brief visual primer for the mapping of mortality trend data. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3:7. Available at: http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/3/1/7. Accessed April 10, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Ormsby T, Napoleon E, Burke R, Groessl C, Feaster L. Getting to Know ArcGISTM Desktop. Redlands, Calif: ESRI Press; 2001.
6. Cossman RE, Cossman JS, Jackson R, Cosby A. Mapping high or low mortality places across time in the United States: a research note on a health visualization and analysis project. Health Place. 2003;9: 361–369.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7. Tobler WR. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr. 1970;46: 234–240.[CrossRef]
8. Meade M, Florin J, Gesler W. Vignette 7–3 spatial autocorrelation. In: Meade M, Florin J, Gesler W, eds. Medical Geography. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1988:227–230.
9. Murray MA. The geography of death in the United States and the United Kingdom. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 1967;57:301–314.[CrossRef][ISI]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |