AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print May 2, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.087346v1
96/6/956    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Health Financing
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Other Health Service Delivery
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research
June 2006, Vol 96, No. 6 | American Journal of Public Health 956
© 2006 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.087346


LETTER

SAFETY NET LESSONS FROM THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

Scott A. Simpson, BA

Scott A. Simpson is a student at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Scott A. Simpson (e-mail: ss{at}mail.med.upenn.edu).

I read with interest Long et al.’s new analysis of outpatient trends at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the December 2005 issue.1 A reinvigorated political interest in health care reform, with a push for consumer choice and responsibility, compels our profession to consider the role of social safety net systems (of which, Long et al. note, the VHA is a part).

This analysis should make us reconsider how far up the economic ladder our public health safety net now reaches. Long’s group found that many veterans now use the VHA in concert with other providers, especially to alleviate rising medication costs. Although Long et al. recognize the increasing frequency with which poor, old, and minority patients access VHA outpatient care, many VHA patients fall outside these categories. The VHA is a mechanism for health relief used by many insured, pensioned, and middle-class persons as well—patients not often perceived as requiring a safety net. The increasing use of the VHA suggests that more than just the neediest Americans are living, at least in part, off public health resources. This receipt of care through the VHA may represent augmentation—receipt of additional care that might otherwise have been unattainable—for some, but it also suggests that our notion of medical assistance is no longer restricted to the lowest socioeconomic strata. Further studies should explore the extent to which those with more resources than the most traditionally vulnerable persons use the safety net.

Additionally, the increase in numbers of "dual-use" patients, as Long et al. call them, exemplifies the potential for success of a social health system in the medical marketplace. Even when patients are not obliged to use VHA care, they choose to seek care there because of lower costs and better quality. Many market proponents may be surprised that a bureaucracy like the VHA can deliver such results, winning customers in the process. Yet market critics should also take heart—future market-oriented reforms may give social systems their best chance to shine.

The issues that Long et al. raise are ones that should not be neglected as health care reform once again creeps into the political arena.

Reference

1. Long JA, Polsky D, Metlay JP. Changes in veterans’ use of outpatient care from 1992 to 2000. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:2246–2251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al.
Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.087346v1
96/6/956    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Health Financing
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Other Health Service Delivery
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association