| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Jane M. Simoni and Kimberly F. Balsam are with the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle. Karina L. Walters is with the School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle. At the time of the study, Seth B. Meyers was with the Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jane M. Simoni, Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 (e-mail: jsimoni{at}u.washington.edu).
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Objectives.secondary aims included describing condom-use attitudes, beliefs about HIV/AIDS in the Indian community, HIV knowledge, HIV status, and preference for and access to HIV prevention services in this population.
Methods. A survey was mailed to all members of an American Indian community organization in New York City.
Results. The 20 men self-identifying as gay, two-spirit, or bisexual (hereafter, "two-spirit") were more likely to report being victimized and engaging in HIV risk behaviors than the 51 heterosexual respondents, although they reported comparable levels of recent substance use. Overall, victimization was associated with lifetime HIV risk behaviors (even after control for sexual orientation) but not with substance use or unsafe sex in the past 12 months. The percentage of HIV infection was surprisingly high (10% of two-spirit men and 6% of heterosexual men).
Conclusions. Two-spirit men are a vulnerable population whose victimization must be understood within an appropriate historical and political context.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Although preliminary evidence suggests that American Indian men might respond differently than American Indian women to the history of indigenous oppression,4 there is little empirical research on the health status of American Indian men. Data from the only 2 comprehensive reviews of American Indian men’s health indicate that they suffer from disproportionate rates of poor health compared with men in the general population.5 Additionally, life expectancy for American Indian men is significantly shorter than for White men or American Indian women, with early death caused in part by disproportionate rates of homicide, suicide, and motor vehicle accidents.6 Indeed, 5 of the top 10 leading causes of death for American Indian men (i.e., unintentional injuries, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, suicide, and homicide) are related to voluntary risky behaviors such as alcohol abuse, and might be preventable with appropriate public health intervention.7
A subgroup of American Indian men at increased risk for adverse health outcomes is self-identified gay, bisexual, or "two-spirit" men. Indigenous activists have adopted the term "two-spirit" as a way for gay, bisexual, or transgendered American Indians to name themselves outside the colonizing terms previously imposed upon them (e.g., "berdache"), to reconnect with tribal traditions related to sexuality and gender identity, and to transcend the Eurocentric binary categorizations of heterosexual versus homosexual and male versus female.8 Gay and bisexual American Indian men confront stressors associated with negotiating their multiple oppressed statuses and often must contend with heterosexism in American Indian communities as well as racism in gay communities.9–11
|
Victimization Experiences |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Among men in the general population, both physical and sexual victimization have been linked to substance abuse.16–19 Preliminary research indicates that these links also exist among gay/bisexual men from the general population20 and American Indian men.21,22 We could locate no studies of victimization and substance use among two-spirit men.
|
HIV Sexual Risk Behaviors |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
|
Predictors of Sexual Risk Behaviors: Victimization and Substance Use |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Only recently has research begun to investigate the co-occurrence of substance use and risky sex among American Indians.21,27,33 In one study of American Indian/Alaska Native drug users, 50% reported drinking until drunk and engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse while in a blackout state.34 Other preliminary research indicates that urban American Indian/Alaska Native drug users are at greater risk for HIV infection than their reservation counterparts because of sex work (i.e., having sex in exchange for money, drugs, or other favors) and unprotected sex.35,36 Other studies have confirmed the association of injection drug use and HIV risk behaviors among American Indians.37,38
|
Present Study |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Measures
We used investigator-developed scales to assess victimization, lifetime HIV risk behaviors, recent (i.e., in past 12 months) substance use, recent (i.e., in past 12 months) sexual behaviors, sexual partner risk factors, HIV status and other HIV-related variables, and HIV prevention and program planning issues (specific items are included in the Results and tables). Standardized scales were used to assess other variables. Specifically, attitudes toward condom use were measured with 13 items scored on a Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) adapted from Helweg-Larsen and Collins.39 Knowledge about HIV was assessed with 11 yes/no/do-not-know items (S. Kalichman, PhD, written communication, June 1998; the Cronbach 
in the present sample was 0.63). To measure attitudes toward HIV/AIDS in the Indian community, respondents rated 13 attitudinal items adapted from Myers et al.40 on a Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).
Procedure
The current survey was part of a larger project to assess HIV risk behaviors and prevention needs in the American Indian community in New York City. A survey packet containing an anonymous 6-page questionnaire, a $1 appreciation gift, a ticket for a $500 lottery gift, and a postage-paid return envelope was mailed to all 748 members of an American Indian community organization in December 1998. Membership requires documentation of enrollment or eligibility for enrollment in a state or federally recognized American Indian or Alaska Native tribe or a written statement of support from tribal leaders. Although there are no requirements regarding sobriety to join the association, the center denies access to the premises to any individual obviously intoxicated or high. A postcard reminder was sent 2 weeks after the survey.
Forty surveys were returned because of errors in name or address. Approximately one third of the remaining surveys were returned, which is comparable to response rates typically observed in unsolicited mail surveys. Considering that the survey was mailed during the holiday season, targeted an oppressed population that is justifiably distrustful of researchers, concerned sensitive subject matter, and guaranteed no monetary remuneration, the response rate was considered acceptable for preliminary analyses.
Data Analysis
Analyses proceeded in 4 stages. First, we computed descriptive statistics, including frequencies for all variables. Second, t tests, 
2, and multiple analyses of variance (MANOVA) were used to examine differences between two-spirit and heterosexual men for all variables; results are reported for respondents overall where no differences were found. Third, we conducted bivariate analyses to examine the association of victimization with sociodemographics, recent substance use, and recent sexual risk behaviors. Finally, we examined correlates of lifetime HIV risk behaviors, first with bivariate analyses and then in a multiple regression analysis to determine independent predictors.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
).
|
). There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to risky behaviors during their most recent sexual experience: Overall, 24% of respondents reported that they used alcohol or drugs before or during their most recent sexual encounter, and 68% reported that they did not use a condom during their most recent sexual encounter.
|
).
|
There were no significant differences between two-spirit and heterosexual men with respect to substance-related recent sexual risk behaviors. Specifically, respondents who were sexually active in the past 12 months indicated they had used alcohol or other drugs just before or during sex never (60%), less than half the time (19%), about half the time (5%), more than half the time (7%), and always (7%). Their ability to request or use a condom had been affected by their own or their partner’s alcohol or other drug use never (84%), less than half the time (5%), about half the time (2%), more than half the time (5%), and always (2%).
Sexual partner risk factors.
As shown in Table 4, two-spirit men (n = 8) were more likely than heterosexual men (n = 29) to attribute 6 of the 8 risk factors to partners with whom they had anal or vaginal sex without a condom in the past 12 months.
|
HIV knowledge. Respondents correctly answered from 4 to all 11 of the HIV knowledge items (mean = 9.52; SD = 1.64), with no differences between two-spirit and heterosexual men.
HIV status and other HIV-related variables.
Fifty-six percent of respondents reported that their physician knows they are American Indian, with no differences between two-spirit and heterosexual men. Two-spirit men were more likely than heterosexual men to know of an HIV-positive immediate family member (20% vs 0%) (2 [n=71]=11.69; P<.005), or close friend (85% vs 28%) (2 [n=71]= 19.43; P<.001). Significantly more two-spirit than heterosexual men had been tested for HIV (90% vs 57%) (2 [n=71]=7.05; P< .01). However, there was no significant difference in the percentage who reported having HIV/AIDS (yes/no/don’t know) among two-spirit (10%/90%/0%) and heterosexual men (6%/84%/10%). Overall, the HIV-negative men reported the following self-perceived risk of contracting HIV: no risk (30%), low risk (48%), moderate risk (8%), high risk (8%), and extremely high risk (0%; 7% had missing data), with no difference by sexual orientation.
Attitudes toward HIV/AIDS in the American Indian community. A MANOVA revealed no significant differences by sexual orientation with respect to attitudes regarding HIV/ AIDS in the American Indian community. Both two-spirit and heterosexual men recognized the threat of HIV in the American Indian community, acknowledged the need and expressed support for HIV prevention efforts, and wholeheartedly rejected the exclusion of American Indians living with HIV/ AIDS from the community. Thirty percent agreed or strongly agreed with the item "AIDS is another form of germ warfare on Indian people."
HIV prevention and program planning.
Comparable percentages of two-spirit and heterosexual men thought HIV education services in the home (36%), HIV education services at an American Indian community setting (75%), instruction in getting their partner to use a condom with them (32%), and instruction on using the female condom (32%) would be helpful to them. Two-spirit men were more likely than heterosexual men to consider free condoms/barriers to be a potentially helpful service (80% vs 49%) (2 [n = 66] = 3.9; P < .05). Finally, 21% of respondents reported needing or wanting information, support, or treatment related to HIV in the past 12 months, with no difference by sexual orientation. Among these respondents, 100% of the 7 two-spirit men reported that they received what they needed or wanted, compared with only 33% of the 8 heterosexual men (2 = 7.47; P < .01).
Correlates of Victimization
A series of bivariate analyses revealed no significant association between victimization and any sociodemographic indicator. Contrary to our hypotheses, victimization was not associated with any of the indicators of recent substance use. Although it was not significantly correlated with consistency of recent condom use, victimization was significantly associated with the total number of sexual partner risk factors for respondents who reported any anal or vaginal sex without a condom in the past 12 months (r = 0.76; P < .001). Finally, victimization was associated with the frequency of failure to use a condom because of the influence of alcohol or other drugs in the past 12 months (r = 0.37; P < .01).
Correlates of Lifetime HIV Risk Behaviors
Bivariate analyses indicated the only significant correlates of lifetime HIV risk behaviors were victimization (r = 0.51; P < .001), and being two-spirit versus heterosexual (t69 = –3.02; P < .01). To determine whether victimization and sexual orientation independently predicted lifetime HIV risk behaviors, both variables were simultaneously entered into a regression analysis. The overall model accounted for 27% of the variance in HIV risk behaviors (F2,68 = 12.65; P < .001), but only victimization remained significant as a predictor (B = 0.46; P < .001).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Additionally, as well as being more likely to know of an HIV-positive immediate family member and close friend and to have been tested for HIV, two-spirit men were nearly twice as likely as heterosexual respondents to have HIV/AIDS (although this difference was not statistically significant in our relatively small sample). These data are not surprising, given the drastically higher rates of HIV among the general population of men who have sex with men versus men who do not have sex with men. However, HIV-negative two-spirit men did not perceive themselves as being at greater risk of contracting HIV than their heterosexual counterparts, suggesting a false sense of security that may underlie their greater involvement in HIV risk behaviors. Indeed, among men who have sex with men, 5-year increases in AIDS incidence rates were higher for American Indians (53%) than for African Americans (45%) or Latinos (23%).41
Most disturbing about the HIV-related findings was the high percentage of American Indian men living with HIV/AIDS in the sample: 10% for two-spirit men and 6% for heterosexual men. The study methodology precludes our interpretation of these as prevalence rates. However, if they are accurate, they suggest that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance data are vast underestimates. Accurately determining the number of American Indian men infected with HIV is difficult because of the lack of mandatory HIV reporting and the rampant racial misclassification of American Indians.42,43
Analyses provided only partial support for our hypothesis that lifetime victimization would be associated with recent substance use and recent unsafe sex, perhaps because of our limited measure of substance use and high rates of abstinence. Recall that the community organization we studied denies access to individuals visibly under the influence of drugs or alcohol, a policy that likely discourages current users from active membership. Aside from sexual orientation, the only other significant correlate of lifetime HIV risk behaviors was victimization.
What might account for these sexual orientation differences and the independent association of victimization and lifetime HIV risk behaviors? The higher levels of victimization among two-spirit men may relate to their sexual and romantic involvement with other men, who may be more likely to perpetrate violence than women. Additionally, two-spirit men are more vulnerable to bias-related victimization because of their sexual minority status.44 Future research should examine the extent to which victimization among this group is bias related.
Previous research has implicated intrapersonal explanations for the association between victimization and risk behaviors. For example, the experience of victimization may create a sense of isolation and loneliness that the survivor attempts to assuage with unsafe sex, or there may be a self-destructive motivation in the pursuit of unsafe sex, especially among men who have internalized the earlier victimizing experience.45 However, in line with both a fourth-world perspective and ecosocial theory,46 victimization and HIV risk behaviors may be related to larger structural factors such as social inequality and discrimination. Future research should include culturally specific items about what motivates sexual risk behaviors among men with histories of victimization and the influence of larger societal and structural factors related to their oppressed status.
A significant minority of the sample (30%) espoused support for a conspiracy theory of AIDS. This finding likely reflects the general mistrust within the American Indian community, whose medical "treatment" by the US government has included the distribution of blankets laden with smallpox virus and involuntary sterilization.47 Efforts targeted at American Indians to prevent HIV, therefore, must be prepared to address high levels of justifiable suspicion and distrust and, ideally, should be developed and delivered in collaboration with community representatives. Indigenist2,3 and postcolonial33 approaches to change as well as more culturally tailored interventions48,49 should be considered.
Limitations of the present study include its cross-sectional nature and inability to specify the timing of reported events, making it impossible to say with certainty which came first: victimization, HIV risk behaviors, or self-identification as two-spirit. Furthermore, we assessed victimization with subjective questions, which require respondents themselves to determine whether experiences constitute "abuse."50 The respondents were all non-randomly recruited members of an American Indian community organization, thereby decreasing external validity. Finally, our sample size of 71 is small, limiting statistical power and suggesting the need to validate our findings in larger samples. Given the dearth of literature on American Indian men and the urgency of their health concerns, however, even a small preliminary study such as the current one merits attention.
Despite these limitations, the study suggests topics to consider in future research targeting American Indian men, including types and prevalence of victimization experiences, substance use as a result of victimization and a precursor to sexual risk behavior, physical and mental health outcomes related to victimization, and the most efficacious interventions for this at-risk population. Most importantly, the study underscores how American Indian men’s health behaviors must be considered within the context of their ongoing experience of victimization as members of an oppressed population in a fourth-world context. A larger consideration of historical and cultural trauma perpetrated against their ancestors and tribal communities according to an "indigenist" perspective is needed to appropriately contextualize American Indian men’s current victimization and to understand its effects on their risk behaviors and adverse health outcomes.51
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Human Participant Protection
The research was conducted according to human subjects regulations at the study site and the New York City Department of Health.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Contributors
J. M. Simoni and K. L. Walters conceptualized and conducted the study and, along with S. B. Meyers, analyzed data and wrote the first draft of the paper. K. F. Balsam conducted additional data analyses and wrote parts of the "Results" and "Discussion" sections.
Accepted for publication September 29, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONVictimization ExperiencesHIV Sexual Risk BehaviorsPredictors of Sexual Risk...Present StudyMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
2. Walters KL, Simoni JM, Evans-Campbell T. Substance use among American Indians and Alaska natives: incorporating culture in an "indigenist" stress-coping paradigm. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(suppl 1):S104–S117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Walters KL, Simoni JM. Reconceptualizing native women’s health: an "indigenist" stress-coping model. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:520–524.
4. Brave Heart MY. Gender differences in the historical trauma response among the Lakota. J Health Soc Policy. 1999;10:1–21.[Medline]
5. Rhoades ER. The health status of American Indian and Alaska native males. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:774–778.
6. Trends in Indian Health, 1998–99. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service; 1999.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading Causes of Death Males—United States, 2002. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod.htm. Accessed February 28, 2006.
8. Jacobs S, Thomas W, Lang S. Two-Spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality. Chicago, Ill: University of Illinois Press; 1997.
9. Walters KL. Urban lesbian and gay American Indian identity: Implications for mental health service delivery. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 1997;6:43–65.
10. Walters KL. Negotiating conflicts in allegiances among lesbians and gays of color: Reconciling divided selves and communities. In: Mallon G, ed. Foundations of Social Work Practice With Gay and Lesbian Persons. New York, NY: Harrington Park Press;1998:47–75.
11. Walters KL, Simoni JM, Horwath PF. Sexual orientation bias experiences and service needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered, and two-spirited American Indians. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2001;13:133–149.[CrossRef]
12. Greenfeld LA, Smith SK. American Indians and Crime. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1999.
13. Tomeo ME, Templer DI, Anderson S, Kotler D. Comparative data of childhood and adolescent molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. Arch Sex Behav. 2001;30:535–541.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Huebner DM, Rebchook GM, Kegeles SM. Experiences of harassment, discrimination, and physical violence among young gay and bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1200–1203.
15. Saewyc EM, Skay CL, Bearinger LH, Blum RW, Resnick MD. Sexual orientation, sexual behaviors, and pregnancy among American Indian adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23:238–247.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16. Flanigan BJ. The social context of alcohol consumption prior to female sexual intercourse. J Alcohol Drug Edu. 1990;3:97–113.
17. Molnar BE, Buka SL, Kessler RC. Child sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:753–760.[Abstract]
18. Stewart SH. Alcohol abuse individuals exposed to trauma: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1996;120:83–112.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Thompson MP, Kingree JB, Desai S. Gender differences in long-term health consequences of physical abuse of children: data from a nationally representative survey. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:599–604.
20. Doll LS, Joy D, Bartholow BN, et al. Self-reported childhood and adolescent sexual abuse among adult homosexual bisexual men. Child Abuse Negl. 1992;16: 855–864.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Libby AM, Orton HD, Novins DK, et al. Childhood physical and sexual abuse and subsequent alcohol and drug use disorders in two American-Indian tribes. J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65:74–84.[Web of Science][Medline]
22. Robin RW, Chester B, Rasmussen JK, Jaranson JM, Goldman D. Prevalence, characteristics, and impact of childhood sexual abuse in a Southwestern American Indian tribe. Child Abuse Negl. 1997;21:769–787.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. Young Men’s Survey Study Group. JAMA. 2000;284:198–204.
24. Blum RW, Harmon B, Harris L, Bergeisen L, Resnick MD. American Indian-Alaska Native youth health. JAMA. 1992;267:1637–1644.
25. Calzavara LM, Bullock SL, Myers T, Marshall VW, Cockerill R. Sexual partnering and risk of HIV/STD among Aboriginals. Can J Public Health. 1999;90: 186–191.[Web of Science][Medline]
26. Metler R, Conway GA, Stehr-Green J. AIDS surveillance among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1469–1471.
27. Walters KL, Simoni JM, Harris C. Patterns and predictors of HIV risk among urban American Indians. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2000;9:1–21.[Medline]
28. Saewyc EM, Skay CL, Bearinger LH, Blum RW, Resnick MD. Demographics of sexual orientation among American-Indian adolescents. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:590–600.[Web of Science][Medline]
29. Warren CW, Goldberg HI, Oge L, et al. Assessing the reproductive behavior of on- and off-reservation American Indian females: characteristics of two groups in Montana. Soc Biol. 1990;37:69–83.[Web of Science][Medline]
30. Purcell DW, Malow RM, Dolezal C, Carballo-Dieguez A. Sexual abuse of boys: Short- and long-term associations and implications for HIV prevention. In: Koenig LJ, Doll LS, O’Leary A, Pequegnat W, eds. From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and Intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press; 2003.
31. Kalichman SC, Benotsch E, Rompa D, et al. Unwanted sexual experiences and sexual risks in gay and bisexual men: associations among revictimization, substance use, and psychiatric symptoms. J Sex Research. 2001;38:1–9.
32. Paul JP, Catania J, Pollack L, Stall R. Understanding childhood sexual abuse as a predictor of sexual risk-taking among men who have sex with men: The Urban Men’s Health Study. Child Abuse Negl. 2001;25:557–584.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
33. Duran B, Walters KL. HIV/AIDS Prevention in "Indian country": current practice, indigenist etiology models, and postcolonial approaches to change. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:187–201.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
34. Baldwin JA, Maxwell CJ, Fenaughty AM, Trotter RT, Stevens SJ. Alcohol as a risk factor for HIV transmission among American Indian and Alaska Native drug users. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2000;9:1–16.[Medline]
35. Fisher DG, Fenaughty AM, Paschane DM, Cagle HH. Alaska Native drug users and sexually transmitted disease: results of a five-year study. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2000;9:47–57.
36. Stevens SJ, Estrada AL, Estrada BD. HIV drug and sex risk behaviors among American Indian and Alaska Native drug users: gender and site differences. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2000;9:33–46.[Medline]
37. Loecker G, Smith DA, Smith L, Bunger P. HIV associated risk factors: a survey of a troubled adolescent population. S D J Med. 1992;45:91–94.[Medline]
38. Simoni JM, Sehgal S, Walters KL. Triangle of risk: urban American Indian women’s sexual trauma, injection drug use, and HIV sexual risk behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2004;8:33–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
39. Helweg-Larsen M, Collins BE. The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Health Psychol. 1994;13:224–237.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
40. Myers T, Calzavera LM, Cockerill R, Marshall V, Bullock SL. Ontario First Nations AIDS and Healthy Lifestyle Survey. Ottowa, Ontario, Canada: National AIDS Clearing-house, Canadian Public Health Association; 1993.
41. Sullivan PS, Chu SY, Fleming PL, Ward JW. Changes in AIDS incidence for men who have sex with men, United States 1990–1995. AIDS. 1997;11:1641–1646.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
42. Bertolli J, McNaghten AD, Campsmith M, et al. Surveillance systems monitoring HIV/AIDS and HIV risk behaviors among American Indians and Alaska Natives. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:218–237.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. Lieb LE, Conway GA, Hedderman M, Yao J, Kerndt PR. Racial misclassification of American Indians with AIDS in Los Angeles County. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1992;5:1137–1141.
44. Herek GM, Gillis JR, Cogan JC, Glunt EK. Hate crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: prevalence, psychological correlates, and methodological issues. J Interpers Viol. 1997;12:195–215.[Abstract]
45. Martin JI, Knox J. Loneliness and sexual risk behavior in gay men. Psychol Rep. 1997;81:815–825.[Web of Science][Medline]
46. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider? Soc Sci Med. 1994; 39:887–903.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
47. Churchill W. From a Native Son: Selected Essays on Indigenism, 1985–1995. Boston, Mass: South End Press; 1996.
48. Baldwin JA, Rolf JE, Johnson J, Bowers J, Benally C, Trotter RT. Developing culturally sensitive HIV/ AIDS and substance abuse prevention curricula for Native American youth. J Sch Health. 1996;66:322–327.[Web of Science][Medline]
49. Claymore BJ, Taylor MA. AIDS—tribal nations face the newest communicable disease: an Aberdeen area perspective. Am Indian Culture and Research J. 1989;13:21–31.
50. Silvern L, Waelde LC, Baughan BM, Karyl J, Kaersvang LL. Two formats for eliciting retrospective reports of child sexual and physical abuse: effects on apparent prevalence and relationships to adjustment. Child Maltreat. 2000;5:236–250.
51. Turner RJ, Lloyd DA. Lifetime traumas and mental health: the significance of cumulative adversity. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:360–376.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. H. Chae and K. L. Walters Racial Discrimination and Racial Identity Attitudes in Relation to Self-Rated Health and Physical Pain and Impairment Among Two-Spirit American Indians/Alaska Natives Am J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 99(S1): S144 - S151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Lampinen, K. Chan, A. Anema, M. L. Miller, A. J. Schilder, M. T. Schechter, R. S. Hogg, and S. A. Strathdee Incidence of and Risk Factors for Sexual Orientation-Related Physical Assault Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men Am J Public Health, June 1, 2008; 98(6): 1028 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
