|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LETTER |
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Colin McCord, MD, 50 Courtland Rd, Oxford, United Kingdom OX4 4JB (e-mail: cwm1{at}columbia.edu).
In "Asleep at the Switch: Local Public Health and Chronic Disease,"1 Frieden has identified almost all of the many important targets for departments of public health wanting to do something about the burden of chronic disease. He is absolutely right that there are proven effective measures at hand that could greatly reduce this burden. But one could come away from the editorial with the idea that, given the right priorities and enough funds, public health departments can do the job. Its more complicated than that.
Certainly, funding for chronic disease control in public health departments is inadequate. But it is not just a question of more funds to educate the public and the health care providers to do the right thing. There are forces out there that actively and passively resist many of the actions that must be taken to get at the causes of chronic disease. To take a few examples:
Of course, a department of public health is part of a government and cant take on all targets at the same time. But advocacy and health education need to include public action to take on the corporate and government forces that resist needed change. The public and, especially, public health professionals should recognize that there will be some battles.
Reference
1. Frieden TR. Asleep at the switch: local public health and chronic disease. Am J Public Health.2004; 94:20592061.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |