|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Sibylle Kranz is with the Department of Nutritional Sciences and the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pa. Anna Maria Siega-Riz is with the Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, and the Department of Maternal and Child Health, and Amy H. Herring is with the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sibylle Kranz, PhD, RD, Population Research Institute, 5-G Henderson Bldg, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (e-mail: sxk72{at}psu.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives. We determined diet quality trends among nationally representative samples of preschoolers between 1977 and 1998.
Methods. Adjusted diet quality index scores, overall intake, and tertiles of total score were compared for combined samples and 2 age groups using t tests with Bonferroni correction; surveys used were the US Department of Agricultures National Food Consumption Survey 19771979 (n = 2342), Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) 19891991 (n = 858), and CSFII 19941996 and 1998 (n = 5355).
Results. Total scores increased slightly. Consumption of grains, fruits, and vegetables improved while added sugar and juice intake worsened.
Conclusions. Diet quality improved marginally since 1977. Consumption of fruits and vegetables needs to be increased and that of total and saturated fat, juice, and added sugar decreased.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been recognized that a safe and effective approach to decreasing the prevalence of overweight among children could be the improvement of overall diet quality and thus the establishment of healthier eating patterns.912 A high-quality diet is one that provides the nutrients and foods needed to maintain optimal health and promote growth and development. Assessment of diet quality aims to capture dietary intake patterns rather than intakes of individual nutrients or foods and is based on established dietary intake recommendations.13
Since dietary behavior tracks well from early childhood,1417 the establishment of healthy eating patterns at a very young age might support better diet during childhood and thus in adults. As previous studies showed, preschoolers diets typically do not provide sufficient servings of fruit and vegetables but exceed the recommended intake in fat, saturated fat, and juice.18 In this population, the 2 main food sources for fat, saturated fat, added sugar, and grains are high-fat desserts and high-fat grain-based mixed dishes (data available from the authors upon request). Thus, targeting diet quality to improve childhood obesity might entail messages to limit intake of certain foods and food groups rather than focusing solely on increasing consumption of certain nutrients.
This study aimed to assess trends in overall diet quality in a study using nationally representative samples of the American preschool population from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Food Consumption Survey (NFCS) for 1977 to 1979 (referred to here as NFCS77), the USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) for 1989 to 1991 (CSFII89), and the 19941996 CSFII combined with the supplemental survey of children for 1998 (CSFII94). We developed an overall Diet Quality Index for Children (C-DQI) and examined component scores in each survey to establish whether there are trends over the 3 survey time periods (scoring criteria of the index are available from the authors upon request). To observe differences by age group, we conducted an analysis using the full sample in each survey year, as well as 2 mutually exclusive age groups (children aged 2 years and 3 years, compared with children aged 4 years and 5 years).
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Samples
This analysis includes only children aged between 2 and 5 years who were not breastfed and for whom sociodemographic information was provided and data were available on at least 2 days of intake: 2342 children in the NFCS77, 849 in the CSFII89, and 5437 in the CSFII94. In all 3 surveys, interview respondents or another adult in the household reported diets of children aged younger than 6 years. The data sets provide sociodemographic information, dietary intakes, and a food servings database file with the number of Food Guide Pyramid19 serving sizes per 100g of a food code. Food codes were linked to intake data similarly in all 3 survey years to accommodate new food codes in the latest survey wave and to make data comparable across all survey waves.
Variables
Sociodemographic information, such as age, race, gender, total household income, years of education, and employment, was ascertained during the survey. In this study, education and employment data of the female head of household were used as a proxy for mothers. In an effort to capture cultural differences, the variables race (Black, White, and other) and Hispanic origin (Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, other Spanish subgroup, or non-Hispanic) were recoded to define 4 distinct ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other, and Hispanic. Similar coding has been employed by Odgen et al.20 Urbanicity was defined as living in a nonmetropolitan statistical area (non-MSA), MSA central city, or MSA noncentral city.
The C-DQI was employed to determine overall diet quality. This composite assessment tool was specifically designed to assess over- and underconsumption of nutrients, foods, or food groups important for American children of preschool age. On the basis of the definition by Ibrahim,21 only areas of public health importance were included, resulting in 8 components: added sugar, total fat, saturated fat, grains, fruits and vegetables, dairy products, excessive juice, and iron. Added sugar, fat, and saturated fat were assessed as percentage of total energy. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and dairy products were assessed by number of servings, excess juice by number of 6-ounce servings of 100% fruit juices in excess of 1 serving per day, and iron by milligrams per day. To accommodate the consumption of smaller portions by younger children, serving sizes for children aged 2 and 3 years were two thirds of the serving size for older children.19 Component scores were allocated according to dietary intake, with increasing points reflecting improved diet quality. The measured component scores were compiled into a composite overall dietary intake score.
Analysis
Descriptive statistics (means and standard errors) were employed to describe the study sample populations by age groups. Standard errors were employed to allow estimation of the stability of the mean after weighted analysis was conducted. To account for differences in the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics in the American population over time, estimates were adjusted for ethnicity, urbanicity, maternal employment, and education status. To ascertain whether there was a significant trend in diet quality status between surveys, Student t tests were performed on the adjusted mean total C-DQI scores, as well as component scores, between individuals in the NFCS77 and CSFII89, CSFII89 and CSFII94, and NFCS77 and CSFII94. A P value of .05 that was corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni correction was assumed to detect significance between mean scores (P
.0019).
To further examine the changes of dietary intake over time, we subsequently compared average intakes of the nutrient, foods, and food groups that comprise the C-DQI of each of the 3 survey waves in the full sample as well as by age group (P
.0006). Additionally, we assessed whether there was a significant difference in intakes between individuals in the 2 age groups (P
.0019). To assess where areas of improvement were, we compared the average intakes of the C-DQI components in the lowest and highest tertile of total C-DQI points from the sample in the NFCS77 and CSFII94.
Changes occurring in dietary intake or dietary intake patterns can be assessed by several methods.22,23 If one assumes that the population investigated is the same (such as in a longitudinal study) or comparable and that the methods are similar, one can determine differences over time to establish trends. There is no longitudinal nationally representative data set available at this time. Thus, the nationally representative character of the 3 surveys was used as bases for comparability of the data sets to estimate trends over time. Although the dietary data collection slightly varied between the 2 older surveys (NFCS77 and CSFII89) and the most recent one (CSFII94), the methods were comparable and satisfactory for assessing dietary intake in large populations. Similar assumptions have been used by others to establish dietary trends over time in the US population.22,2429 The statistical package used for all analysis was Stata (version 7.0; Stata Corp, College Station, Tex), which allowed adjustment for sample design effect and weighting to maintain the nationally representative character of the data.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Examination of diets between age groups within each survey year showed that the diets of children aged 2 and 3 years were significantly different from those of children 4 and 5 years old in most of the components in the NFCS77 and CSFII94 but not in the CSFII89.
Comparison of intakes in the lowest and highest tertile of C-DQI total points in the sample from the NFCS77 and CSFII94 (Table 4
) indicated that intake of servings of grains and fruit increased over time across tertiles, whereas intake of fat and saturated fat decreased; thus, in the CSFII94, children in the lowest tertile consumed less fat or saturated fat as percentage of total energy than children in the highest tertile in 1977. Added sugar increased in both survey years in the lowest as well as highest tertiles, while dairy intake remained fairly stable. Excess juice consumption was equal in both tertiles in the NFCS77 and was much lower than in either tertile in the CSFII94 (0.2 serving, compared with 1.0 serving in the lowest tertile and 0.7 serving in the highest tertile in the CSFII94). Iron consumption also increased over time; consumption in the lowest tertile in the CSFII94 was not much lower than in the highest tertile in the NFCS77 (10.4 mg/day vs 11.3 mg/day). Likewise, total energy consumption increased over time; children in the lowest tertile of the C-DQI score in 1998 only consumed 21.5 kcal/day less than children in the highest tertile in 1977.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Total energy consumption increased significantly between 1977 and 1998, which might have contributed to the increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity. However, one has to consider that the methods of dietary intake assessment have changed over time and that some of the increased energy might have owed to improved measurement methods. Our results illustrate that although overall diet quality has improved over time, overall energy intake has risen significantly, and there has been a shift from consumption of fats as a high proportion of total energy intake to one of nonfat macronutrients (for instance, added sugars). As comparison of the lowest and highest tertiles of the total C-DQI scores indicates, over a 21-year period, consumption of certain items, such as grains and fruit, increased, while others (fat and saturated fat) decreased to levels below those of 1977. Hence, the change in dietary intake has affected the total preschool-age population, not just the proportion of children who had higher or lower diet quality in 1977.
It is noteworthy that the C-DQI scores of children aged 2 and 3 years were higher for most components of the C-DQI, indicating that younger children have a healthier diet than older children. This might be because of the higher level of control in young childrens environment by parents or other caretakers. Older children are able to make more food choices independent of an adult and appear to select less healthy items.
The scoring scheme of the C-DQI uses different cutoff points for children aged 2 and 3 years compared with those aged 4 and 5 years in the total fat and saturated fat component, to better accommodate the most recent dietary intake recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics.34 In addition, the recommended dietary intakes for younger children are lower than for children aged older than 4 years, and thus younger children scored differently in the iron component than older children. However, this did not distort the relationship between actual dietary intake and C-DQI scores. As shown in Table 3
, the intakes of older children were significantly different from the diets of the younger ones, and as previous analysis has shown, diet quality deteriorated within each age group with increasing age (data available from the authors upon request).
The apparent contradiction between higher total diet quality scores and the increasing prevalence of childhood obesity can be explained by the shift in the C-DQI component scores over time. As Table 4
indicates, while consumption of grains, fruit, vegetables, and dairy products increased even in individuals in the lowest tertile of C-DQI total points to levels that are closer to the recommended intakes, percentage of total energy from added sugar strongly increased; it is even higher for the children in the highest C-DQI tertile in the CSFII94 than in the same tertile in the NFCS77. While consumption of fat in terms of percentage of total energy has decreased, data indicated that consumption in absolute amounts increased and contributed to higher energy intakes. Thus, although our index indicates more healthy food choices, overall energy consumption has increased, which might be a contributor to the increasing prevalence of childhood obesity.
One of the limitations of this study was that dietary intakes for children were collected by proxy in all survey waves. Childrens diets were reported by an adult who may have lacked complete knowledge of everything the child ate. Dietary assessment using 24-hour recalls is prone to incomplete data owing to memory lapses and may not be typical of usual intake. However, in large population studies, such as those conducted for nutrition monitoring purposes, more complicated dietary assessment methods are not feasible, and 2 days of data provide reasonable estimates at the group level. Additionally, bias might have been introduced owing to increased public awareness of the importance of limiting fat and saturated fat, especially in the later surveys; items high in fat and saturated fat might therefore have been underreported.
Another potential limitation to this study is the possibility of a bias in unknown direction owing to the change in dietary intake assessment methods between surveys. In the most recent survey, dietary intake data were collected in the form of 2 24-hour recalls, whereas in 1989 and 1977 there was only 1 such recall, but 2 consecutive days of food records were collected. Also, increases and changes in the food supply have occurred during the time span investigated. Although we used a system to link the food codes between survey years, additional alterations in consumption might have owed to the change in food supply. The direction and magnitude of this bias has not yet been specified.
It may be necessary to revise our C-DQI owing to the most recent release of new dietary reference intakes for macronutrients by the National Academy of Sciences.35 Once the appropriateness of the new recommendations for dietary intake for preschool age children has been established by authorities in pediatric nutrition, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, a revised C-DQI might be developed.
Our research found that overall diet quality among preschool children has marginally improved over the past 21 years; however, total energy intake and consumption of fruit juices and added sugar have significantly increased. Nutritional concerns for American children have shifted from problems of deficient intakes to overconsumption of energy-contributing food groups, which this diet quality tool assesses. Overall diet in children needs to be improved to aid prevention of chronic diseases in adulthood.36,37 Studies using the Healthy Eating Index drew similar conclusions to the ones reported here.38,39 However, results of those studies were limited to the assessment of items provided by the Food Guide Pyramid. Despite their limited diet variety compared with children aged 4 and 5 years, younger children had better diets39; efforts to support high-quality diets from an early age might therefore improve health outcomes in the future.15,16,33,40
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Human Participant Protection
This secondary data analysis was approved by the institutional review board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 31, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518525.
3. Guo SS, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Gardner JD, Siervogel RM. The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:810819.
4. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M. Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood. Ann Hum Biol. 1987;14:219229.[ISI][Medline]
5. Guo SS, Huang C, Maynard LM, et al. Body mass index during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood in relation to adult overweight and adiposity: the Fels Longitudinal Study. Int J Obes. 2000;24:16281635.
6. Strauss RS. Childhood obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002;49:175201.[ISI][Medline]
7. Styne DM. Childhood and adolescent obesity: prevalence and significance. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48:823854, vii.[ISI][Medline]
8. Davison KK, Birch LL. Weight status, parent reaction, and self-concept in five-year-old girls. Pediatrics. 2001;107:4653.
9. Ikeda JP, Mitchell RA. Dietary approaches to the treatment of the overweight pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48:955968, ix.[ISI][Medline]
10. Hill JO, Trowbridge FL. Childhood obesity: future directions and research priorities. Pediatrics. 1998;101:570574.
11. Epstein LH, Myers MD, Raynor HA, Saelens BE. Treatment of pediatric obesity. Pediatrics. 1998;101:554570.
12. McBean LD, Miller GD. Enhancing the nutrition of Americas youth. J Am Coll Nutr. 1999;18:563571.
13. The Healthy Eating Index. Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 1995.
14. Boulton TJ, Magarey AM, Cockington RA. Tracking of serum lipids and dietary energy, fat and calcium intake from 1 to 15 years. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84:10501055.[ISI][Medline]
15. Nicklas TA, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Studies of consistency of dietary intake during the first four years of life in a prospective analysis: Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991;10:234241.[Abstract]
16. Zive MM, Berry CC, Sallis JF, Grank GC, Nader PR. Tracking dietary intake in white and Mexican-American children from age 4 to 12. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:683689.[ISI][Medline]
17. Stein AD, Shea S, Basch CE, Contento IR, Zybert P. Variability and tracking of nutrient intakes of preschool children based on multiple administrations of the 24-hour dietary recall. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:14271437.
18. Krebs-Smith SM, Cook A, Subar AF, Cleveland L, Friday J, Kahle LL. Fruit and vegetable intakes of children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:8186.[Abstract]
19. The Food Guide Pyramid for Young Children 2 to 6 Years Old. US Dept of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 1998. Available at: http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/KidsPyra.PyraBook.pdf. Accessed August 5, 2000.
20. Ogden CL, Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States: improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version. Pediatrics. 2002;109:4560.
21. Ibrahim MA. Epidemiology and Health Policy. Rockville, Md: Aspen Systems Corp; 1985.
22. Jahns L, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The increasing prevalence of snacking among US children from 1977 to 1996. J Pediatr. 2001;138:493498.[ISI][Medline]
23. Haines PS, Guilkey DK, Popkin BM. Trends in breakfast consumption of US adults between 1965 and 1991. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96:464470.[ISI][Medline]
24. Byers T. Dietary trends in the United States: relevance to cancer prevention. Cancer. 1993;72:10151018.[ISI][Medline]
25. Gortner WA. US dietary trends and implications. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1977;17:4950.
26. Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. Dietary trends among low socioeconomic status women of childbearing age in the United States from 1977 to 1996: a comparison among ethnic groups. JAMA. 2001;56:4448.
27. Cavadini C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:1824.
28. Popkin BM, Siega-Riz AM, Haines PS, Jahns L. Wheres the fat? Trends in US diets 19651996. Prev Med. 2001;32:245254.[ISI][Medline]
29. Nielsen SJ, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake in US between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res. 2002;10:370378.[ISI][Medline]
30. Institute of Medicine Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
31. Dennison BA. Fruit juice consumption by infants and children: a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 1996;15:4S11S.[Abstract]
32. Morton JF, Guthrie JF. Changes in childrens total fat intakes and their food groups sources of fat, 198991 versus 199495: implications for diet quality. Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 1998;11:4457.
33. Krebs-Smith SM. Progress in improving diet to reduce cancer risk. Cancer. 1998;83:14251432.[ISI][Medline]
34. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Cholesterol in childhood. Pediatrics. 1998;101:141147.
35. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002:936.
36. Kennedy E, Powell R. Changing eating patterns of American children: a view from 1996. J Am Coll Nutr. 1997;16:524529.[Abstract]
37. American Dietetic Association. Dietary guidance for healthy children aged 2 to 11 yearsposition of ADA. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:93101.[ISI][Medline]
38. Carlson A, Lino M, Gerrior SA, Basiotis PP. Report card on the diet quality of children ages 2 to 9. Nutrition Insights. September 2001. Available at: http://www.usda.gov/cnpp/Insights/Insight25.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2004.
39. Lino M, Gerrior SA, Basiotis PP, Anand FS. Report card on the diet quality of children. Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 1999;12:7880.
40. Lin B-H, Guthrie JF, Frazao E. American childrens diets not making the grade. Food Rev. 2001;24:817.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. I Bell and B. J Tepper Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2006; 84(1): 245 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |