|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Peizhong Peter Wang, Elizabeth M. Badley, and Monique A. Gignac are with The Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, and the Division of Outcomes and Population Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto. Peizhong Peter Wang is also with Tianjin Cancer Research Institute, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Peizhong Peter Wang, DPhil, The Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, MP 10-327, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada (e-mail: wang{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined how perceived need for workplace accommodation affects labor-force participation in people with disabilities. We analyzed a Canadian survey with structural equation modeling to test a model incorporating activity limitations and perceived need for workplace accommodations. The results suggested that the effect of upper- and lower-body activity limitation on labor-force participation was mediated by perceived need for workplace accommodations. Thus, the provision of adequate workplace accommodations could enhance labor-force participation in people with disabilities.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of our study was to examine this hypothesis in the Canadian working-age population. Figure 1
shows our conceptual model and specifies the relations among physical activity limitation, labor-force participation, perceived need for workplace accommodation, and sociodemographic factors.
|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A binary outcome variable was created to reflect labor-force participation status: 0 = not in the labor force, and 1 = in the labor force (working and looking for work). Physical activity limitations were measured by 12 variables and were represented by 2 latent constructslower- and upper-body activity limitations (lower- and upper-body activity limitations should be interpreted as lower-body-dominant and upper-bodydominant activity limitations, respectively)derived from confirmatory factor analyses. This categorization was consistent with previous research.11 The sociodemographic variables in this study included age (an ordered variable with 10-year intervals), sex, education, and occupation. For the purposes of this study, various occupations were grouped into 3 categories approximately reflecting the physical demand of work: "nonprofessionals," "semiprofessionals," and "professionals." This categorization was consistent with our previous studies.1214
The perceived need for workplace accommodation variable was derived from participants answers to 8 workplace accommodation questions regarding the availability of (1) handrails, (2) accessible parking, (3) elevators, (4) accessible workstations, (5) accessible washrooms, (6) transportation, (7) job redesign, and (8) flexible work hours. For employed participants, these questions referred to the current work environment, and they were asked about the need for particular accommodations that were not available to them. For those who were unemployed and not in the labor force, these questions were based on the participants perceptions of the need for these accommodations if they would have been offered a job (only those with valid job titles were included in the structural equation modeling analysis). All these items were coded as binary variables: 1 = needed but not available, and 0 = all others. Structural equation modeling analyses were conducted with Mplus.15 Path coefficients in structural equation modeling can be viewed as regression coefficients derived from a set of multiple regression models. Because all path coefficients have been standardized, they can be compared across variables.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors express their appreciation to Professors Blaire Wheaton and Gail Eyssen for their advice and suggestions regarding the brief.
Human Participant Protection
This study was based on secondary data analyses within a public accessible database, and no approval was required.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication January 15, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Pope A, Tarlov A. Disability in America. Towards a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
3. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:374392.[ISI][Medline]
4. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
5. Badley EM. The impact of disabling arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1995;8:221228.[ISI][Medline]
6. The 1991 Health and Activity Limitation Survey Microdata File: Adults in Households, Users Guide. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 1994.
7. Badley EM, Ibanez D. Socioeconomic risk factors and musculoskeletal disability. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:515522.[ISI][Medline]
8. Badley EM, Rothman LM, Wang PP. Modeling physical dependence in arthritis: the relative contribution of specific disabilities and environmental factors. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:335345.[ISI][Medline]
9. Reynolds DL, Chambers LW, Badley EM, et al. Physical disability among Canadians reporting musculoskeletal diseases. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:10201030.[ISI][Medline]
10. Raina P, Dukeshire S, Lindsay J, Chambers LW. Chronic conditions and disabilities among seniors: an analysis of population-based health and activity limitation surveys. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8:402409.[ISI][Medline]
11. Clark DO, Stump TE, Wolinsky FD. A race- and gender-specific replication of five dimensions of functional limitation and disability. J Aging Health. 1997;9:2842.
12. Wang PP, Badley E, Gignac MA. Examining the mediating effect of coping-efficacy between activity limitation and loss of independence in people with arthritis. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association; October 2125, 2001; Atlanta, Ga.
13. Wang PP, Badley EM. Consistent low prevalence of arthritis in Quebec: findings from a provincial variation study in Canada based on several Canadian population health surveys. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:126131.[ISI][Medline]
14. Wang PP, Elsbett-Koeppen R, Geng G, Badley EM. Arthritis prevalence and place of birth: findings from the 1994 Canadian National Population Health Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:442445.
15. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus Users Guide. Los Angeles, Calif: Muthen & Muthen; 1998.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |