AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipscomb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Brown, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipscomb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Brown, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Occupational Health
August 2004, Vol 94, No. 8 | American Journal of Public Health 1431-1435
© 2004 American Public Health Association


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Health Care System Changes and Reported Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Registered Nurses

Jane Lipscomb, PhD, RN, Alison Trinkoff, ScD, RN, Barbara Brady, RN, MS and Jeanne Geiger-Brown, PhD, RN

The authors are with the Department of Family and Community Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, School of Nursing.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jane Lipscomb, PhD, RN, UMB, SON, Suite 665, 655 W Lombard St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (email: lipscomb{at}son.umaryland.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 

Objectives. We evaluated the impact of health care system changes on nurses’ health, and we studied reported musculoskeletal disorders associated with these changes.

Methods. This cross-sectional study (n = 1163) defined a musculoskeletal disorder case as moderate pain that lasted at least 1 week or occurred monthly during the past year. Nurses were asked about changes in the health care system in the past year, and responses to 12 changes were summed and were categorized as low, moderate, or high changes.

Results. When the changes were summed, the adjusted odds ratios for musculoskeletal disorders for more than 6 versus 0 to 1 changes were (1) neck: 4.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.97, 10.08), (2) shoulder: 2.63 (95% CI = 1.17, 5.91), and (3) back: 3.42 (95% CI = 1.61, 7.27).

Conclusions. The adverse impact on health caused by the changing health care system must be addressed to prevent further injuries among nurses.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
Few industries in the United States have undergone more sweeping organizational changes over the past 2 decades than the health care industry. The managed care movement has resulted in shorter hospital stays and higher acuity (severity of illness) levels of hospitalized patients, which has thereby required more skilled and time-consuming nursing care.1 However, because nurses represent the largest expenditure in health care facilities, 1 of the major cost-cutting strategies has been to reduce the size of the nursing workforce, often to inadequate levels.2 Between 1981 and 1993, total hospital employment grew steadily, while nursing personnel declined by 7.3% after case-mix was controlled.3 Recent studies have examined the association between nursing staff levels and quality of care in hospitals and have concluded that a higher percentage of nursing care hours were correlated with better patient outcomes, including fewer medical errors.4–9

Inadequate staffing also has been associated with back injuries among nurses10; however, few studies have examined the association between nursing staff levels and other injuries and illnesses. The Minnesota Nurses Association did examine this association and found that when registered nurse positions in hospitals decreased by 9%, the number of work-related injuries or illnesses among registered nurses increased by 65%.11 Clark et al.12,13 found that poor organizational climates and high workloads were associated with a 50% to 200% increase in the likelihood of needlestick injuries and needlestick near misses among hospital nurses.

Nursing and personal-care facilities rank second (incidence rate = 13.8 per 100) and hospitals rank sixth (incidence rate = 8.4 per 100) among Occupational Safety and Health Administration–recordable nonfatal occupational injuries.14 Nurses who work within these industry sectors face many occupational-health risks, the most common of which are musculoskeletal disorders. For example, the past-year prevalence of low-back pain/injury is 30% to 60%.15–19 Nurses are often required to lift heavy loads, work in awkward postures, and transfer patients.20–23 Because nurses are already at risk for musculoskeletal disorders, a reduction in professional nursing staff and other changes in nursing care delivery are likely to lead to even higher rates of these disorders.

The Institute of Medicine report on nursing staffing10 and the National Occupational Research Agenda Organization of Work group report24 both call for a study of the occupational-health consequences of changes in health care delivery. Therefore, we examined the individual and the combined impacts of health care organizational changes that have accompanied the move to managed health care on reported musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, shoulder, and back. If an association between inadequate nursing staff levels and injuries among nurses can be demonstrated, health care administrators may be compelled to improve current nursing staff systems, especially in light of the shortage of nurses throughout the United States.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
Sample and Data Collection
We conducted our study with a cross-sectional survey design. We selected a random sample of 2000 actively licensed registered nurses from 2 US state registries. The states of Illinois and New York were selected because of the ethnic diversity among their nursing workforces. Also, New York had a high rate of managed care penetration, while Illinois had a low rate at the start of the study.25 Of the 2000 randomly selected nurses, 67 were ineligible because of death or incorrect mailing information, which left 1933 nurses in our sample. We contacted these nurses, and 1428 (74%) responded. Our analysis was restricted to the 1163 respondents who were currently working as nurses, who had been in their current jobs for at least 1 year, and who did not report a nonwork-related injury/accident up to 3 months before the onset of symptoms. Data were collected via an anonymous 8-page survey that was mailed to participants’ homes from October 1999 through February 2000. The questionnaire included questions about neck, shoulder, and back problems; physical and psychological demands; and health care changes. Participant contact included up to 6 first-class mailings: an introductory letter, 2 reminder postcards, and 3 questionnaires.

Variables
We measured reported musculoskeletal disorder cases with items from the Nordic questionnaire of musculoskeletal symptoms,26 including pictures of the affected body sites. The operational definition of a musculoskeletal disorder was having had a relevant symptom (pain, numbness, tingling, aching, stiffness, or burning) in the past year that lasted 1 week or more or occurred at least monthly with at least moderate pain on average. The level of pain was determined with a 5-point pain scale27: "none/no pain," "mild/minimal," "moderate," "severe," and "worst pain ever in my life." This definition of a musculoskeletal disorder was developed, tested, and validated in research conducted by scientists at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.28 Nurses who met the criteria for this definition (for any neck, shoulder, or back musculoskeletal-disorder case, or all 3) were compared with nurses who were completely asymptomatic for any neck, shoulder, or back musculoskeletal-disorder problem.

Nurses were asked to report whether 12 health care system changes that addressed staff levels, patient acuity, and the delivery of nursing care had increased, decreased, or stayed the same over the past year. These 12 items, which were selected from the 37 items used by Shindul-Rothchild,29 represented those changes deemed to be most related to nursing care delivery. Responses that indicated a negative change, such as an increase in unfilled nursing positions or a decrease in the average length of stay, were assigned 1 point each; responses that indicated no change or a positive change were coded 0.

A negative change included an increase in "work/job responsibilities," "floating off regular unit/area"(assignment other than their usual unit), "unfilled registered nurse positions," "registered nurse layoffs," "facilities/units closed," "client/patient load per registered nurse," "full-time registered nurses replaced by part-time/temporary registered nurses," "patient acuity," and "unlicensed personnel providing direct care." Decreases in the number of "nurse executives," "advanced practice nurses"(registered nurses with advanced clinical training, usually a master’s degree in nursing), or "length of stay" also were defined as negative changes. In addition to examining the 12 individual health care system change items, the negative change items were summed ({alpha} coefficient = .81) and were evaluated as low-risk (2–3 changes), moderate-risk (4–6 changes), or high-risk (> 6 changes) categories. Those with 0 or 1 change served as the reference category. The reference and high-risk categories were designed to include the extremes (top 20% and bottom 20%) in the degree of changes. The remaining 60% of nurses reported health care system changes in either the low or moderate category. Three additional items asked respondents whether they agreed or disagreed (4-point scale) with the statement, "My job: (1) has adequate staffing levels; (2) security is good; (3) is very satisfying to me." Responses were dichotomized (agree/strongly agree = reference).

The potentially confounding variables of age and body mass index (BMI) were treated as continuous variables in our analysis. Smoking, race/ethnicity, having children under age 4, and caring for other dependents had as reference categories nonsmoker, White, having no children under 4, and having no other dependents, respectively. Having young children or other dependents was assessed to identify nonwork responsibilities that may place respondents at risk for a musculoskeletal disorder. Current primary workplace (hospital vs other) and position (staff nurse vs other) also were obtained from the respondents.

Psychological demands were measured with 8 items from the Job Content Questionnaire.30,31 Each item (e.g., work hard, work fast) was measured with a 4-point scale to indicate frequency of exposure. Responses were dichotomized and were summed, which generated total scores that ranged from 0 to 8 for a continuous psychological demand scale ({alpha} = 0.78). Exposure to physical demands, such as awkward postures and heavy lifting, was measured with 12 items. In addition to using the highly validated and widely cited Job Content Questionnaire items, we incorporated occupation-specific physical-demand items as recommended by Karasek.32

Data Analysis
The mean of the summed health care system change items was estimated for reported neck, shoulder, and back musculoskeletal-disorder cases and for the nurses who were completely asymptomatic. We generated the age-adjusted odds for being a musculoskeletal-disorder case (neck, shoulder, and back) in relation to each individual health care system change item. We then generated logistic regression models that used the categorized health care system changes variable adjusted for the identified potential explanatory or confounding factors. The covariates were forced into the model with the odds for musculoskeletal disorders reestimated after each addition for the following covariate groups: demographics and lifestyle (age, race/ethnicity, children under 4, dependent care, BMI, smoking), work characteristics (workplace and position), and psychological and physical demands. We used SPSS 10.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill) to conduct our analysis. We used logistic regression analysis because musculoskeletal disorders were not normally distributed among these populations. It should be noted that the odds ratio is an overestimate of the rate ratio or the relative risk in this analysis, where the risk of injury is greater than 10%.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
The prevalence of reported neck, shoulder, and back musculoskeletal-disorder cases among this population was 20%, 17%, and 29%, respectively. Table 1Go provides a description of the sample, including the percentage of nurses who reported the 12 health care system changes. Demographically, the sample reflected US nurses,33 and more than half reported negative changes in 4 health care system change items (Table 1Go). The percentages of nurses who agreed/strongly agreed that "my job has adequate staffing levels," "my job security is good," and "my job is very satisfying to me," were 37%, 25%, and 27%, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1— Sample Demographics and Selected Health Care System Changes Among a Sample of Registered Nurses (n = 1163): New York and Illinois, 1999–2000
 
When analyzed individually, 3 of the 12 health care system change items were significantly associated with musculoskeletal disorders at all 3 body sites (Table 2Go). Three additional changes were associated with back or with neck and back musculoskeletal disorders. The mean number of changes among asymptomatic nurses (3.33) was significantly different from that of nurses who reported neck, shoulder, or back musculoskeletal disorders (4.24–4.47 changes per nurse).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2— Age-Adjusted Odds Ratios for a Musculoskeletal Disorder vs Being Asymptomatic, by Past-Year Negative Health Care System Changes: New York and Illinois, 1999–2000
 
When the sum of health care system changes was categorized, there was a strong association (OR > 2.40) between reported moderate and high levels of health care system changes and neck and back musculoskeletal disorders, and between reported high levels of change and shoulder musculoskeletal disorders, compared with those who reported low levels of health care system changes. After adjustment, the odds for reporting a musculoskeletal disorder at all 3 body sites were attenuated somewhat by psychological and physical demands, yet the odds were still highly significant for the highest level of changes (> 6) compared with the reference group. The adjusted odds ranged from 2.63 to 4.45 (Table 3Go). In other words, an odds ratio of 4.45 meant that among all nurses who reported more than 6 health care system changes were more than 4 times as likely to meet the criteria for a neck musculosketal disorder compared with those who reported 0 or 1 changes after we adjusted for all other variables considered in our analysis. Because these analyses were at the injury level of analysis, and because some nurses reported injury at more than 1 body site, we also analyzed the data with "any case" as the outcome (data not shown). The findings from these analyses were similar to the body site–specific results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3— Odds Ratios for Being a Musculoskeletal-Disorder Case by Categories of Health Care System Changes: New York and Illinois, 1999–2000
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
We found that health care organizational changes were associated with reported musculoskeletal disorders, even after we controlled for demographics, work characteristics, and psychological and physical job demands. The odds ratios for neck, shoulder, and back musculoskeletal disorders showed a consistent and increasing trend with the level of reported health care system change. The physical workload associated with lifting and transferring patients is responsible for many back musculoskeletal disorders among nurses.32 However, our findings indicate an association between organizational changes and musculoskeletal disorders that is independent of the effect of physical job demands. The limited published data on the impact of health care system changes, particularly staff levels, on injuries and illness among nurses support our findings.15–17,31,34 These collective findings suggest a number of different levels at which the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders among nurses should be targeted.

In the United States, changes in health care delivery are having a profound impact on patient care and nursing practice. Our survey data from more than 1000 nurses indicate that nurses are experiencing difficult work conditions that have an impact on their health over and above the psychological and physical job demands. When we asked about health care system changes in the past year, 65% of the nurses reported an increase in patient loads and 68% reported an increase in patient acuity. The fact that only one fourth of the nurses reported their job as "very satisfying" and as "security is good" suggests that an organizational approach to improving health care delivery and quality of care is critically needed. Our findings that health care system changes are associated with up to a 3-fold increase in neck and back musculoskeletal disorders suggest that if changes in workload and work complexity are not addressed, there may be further negative implications for the health care delivery system and, ultimately, patient care.

The cross-sectional design of our study is a limitation in that it prevented us from interpreting the temporal association among variables described in this report. By definition, this cross-sectional study was limited to the current workforce: nurses who no longer worked in nursing because of a musculoskeletal disorder or other health conditions were not included. The absence of these individuals from the study population underestimated the prevalence of reported musculoskeletal disorders and the association of health care system changes with a musculoskeletal disorder. We are currently conducting a longitudinal study to further estimate musculoskeletal-disorder prevalence and to clarify the association between reported past-year health care system changes and the onset of reported musculoskeletal disorders.

A second limitation is the exclusive use of self-reported data. To minimize the likelihood of poor recall of health outcomes, we limited the recall period for reported musculoskeletal disorder to the past year, and we used a threshold definition of a musculoskeletal disorder that was used in other occupational-health research.28 Nurses, as a group, have been shown to provide valid and reproducible risk factor and health outcome data when surveyed.35–37 Because there was no validation of a reported musculoskeletal disorder from observation or from a physical examination, these findings need to be interpreted with caution.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
Our study is an important contribution to the literature because it examines the association between health care system changes and nurses’ health (in this case, musculoskeletal disorders). Our finding that changes in health care services delivery compromises not only quality of care and patient safety but also nurses’ health should provide further evidence of the need for a systematic approach to improving work conditions in the health care industry.


    Acknowledgments
 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health grant #RO1 OH03702 funded this study. The authors would like to thank Alicia Lazarek and Molly Freitag for their assistance with manuscript preparation.

Human Participant Protection
The institutional review board of the University of Maryland, Baltimore, approved the study protocol.


    Footnotes
 
Contributors
A. Trinkoff and J. Lipscomb conceived the study and supervised all aspects of study implementation. J. Lipscomb synthesized the analyses and led the writing of the article. B. Brady assisted with study implementation and conducted data analyses. J. Geiger-Brown conducted data analyses. All authors contributed to the conceptualization of the study, the interpretation of study findings, and the writing of this article.

Peer Reviewed

Accepted for publication April 10, 2003.


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 References
 
1. Buerhaus P, Staiger D. Managed care and the nursing workforce. JAMA. 1996;276:1487–1493.[Abstract]

2. Blythe J, Baumann A, Giovannetti P. Nurses’ experiences of restructuring in three Ontario hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(1):61–68.[ISI][Medline]

3. Aiken LH, Sochalski J, Anderson GF. Downsizing the hospital nursing workforce. Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15(4):88–92.[Medline]

4. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(22):1715–1722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Needleman J. The role of nonprofits in health care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001;26(5):1113–1130.[ISI][Medline]

6. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, et al. Nurses’ report on hospital care in five countries. Health Aff. 2001;20:43–53.

7. Kovner C, Gergen PJ. Nurse staffing levels and adverse events following surgery in US hospitals. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(4):315–321.[Medline]

8. Flood S, Diers D. Nurse staffing, patient outcome and cost. Nurs Manage. 1988;19(5):34–43.

9. Blegen MA, Vaughn T. A multisite study of nurse staffing and patient occurrences. Nurs Econ. 1998;16(4):196–203.[ISI][Medline]

10. Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK. Nursing Staff in Hospitals and Nursing Homes. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1996:173–175.

11. Shogren E, Calkins A, Wilburn S. Restructuring may be hazardous to your health. Am J Nurs. 1996;96(11):64–66.

12. Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. Effects of hospital staffing and organizational climate on needlestick injuries to nurses. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1115–1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Clarke SP, Rockett JL, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses. Am J Infect Control. 2002;30(4):207–216.[ISI][Medline]

14. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/ostb0989.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2001.

15. Engels J, van der Gulden J, Senden T, van’t Hof B. Work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53:636–641.[Abstract]

16. Lagerström M, Wenemark M, Hagberg M, Hjelm E. Occupational and individual factors related to musculoskeletal symptoms in five body regions among Swedish nursing personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;68:27–35.[ISI][Medline]

17. Larese F, Fiorito A. Musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses: a comparison between two hospitals. Ergonomics. 1994;37:1205–1211.[Medline]

18. Smedley J, Egger P, Cooper C, Coggon D. Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. Occup Environ Med. 1995;52:160–163.[Abstract]

19. Ando S, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, et al. Associations of self-estimated workloads with musculoskeletal symptoms among hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57:211–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Brulin C, Gerdle B, Granlund B, Hoog J, Knutson A, Sundelin G. Physical and psychosocial work-related risk factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms among home care personnel. Scand J Caring Sci. 1998;12(2):104–110.[ISI][Medline]

21. Collins JW, Owen BD. NIOSH research initiatives to prevent back injuries to nursing assistants, aides, and orderlies in nursing homes. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(4):421–424.[ISI][Medline]

22. Marras WS, Davis KG, Kirking BC, Bertsche PK. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques. Ergonomics. 1999;42(7):904–926.[Medline]

23. Trinkoff A, Storr C, Lipscomb J. Physically demanding work and inadequate sleep, pain medication use, and absenteeism in registered nurses. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(4):355–363.[ISI][Medline]

24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety Health (NIOSH). The Changing Organization of Work and the Safety and Health of Working People. Cincinnati, Ohio: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2002. NIOSH Publication 2002–116: 1–30.

25. Medical Data International (1998). 1997–1998 managed care profile map. Available at: http://www.medicaldata.com/members/mcmap/default.asp. Accessed February 5, 1999.

26. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilborn A, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergonomics. 1987;18:233–237.[ISI][Medline]

27. Trinkoff A, Lipscomb J, Geiger-Brown J, Brady B. Musculoskeletal problems of the neck, shoulder, and back and functional consequences in nurses. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:170–178.[ISI][Medline]

28. Bernard B, Sauter S, Fine L, Petersen M, Hales T. Job task and psychosocial risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(6):417–426.[ISI][Medline]

29. Shindul-Rothschild J, Berry D, Long-Middleton E. Where have all the nurses gone? Final results of our Patient Care Survey. Am J Nurs. 1996;96(11):25–39.

30. Karasek RA. Job Content Questionnaire and User’s Guide. Lowell, Mass: University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Department of Work Environment; 1985.

31. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–355.[Medline]

32. Trinkoff A, Lipscomb J, Geiger-Brown J, Storr C, Brady B. Perceived physical demands and reported musculoskeletal problems in registered nurses. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3):270–275.[ISI][Medline]

33. Spratley E, Johnson A, Sochalski J, Fritz M, Spencer W. The Registered Nurse Population. March 2000. Washington DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; September 2001.

34. Lipscomb J, Trinkoff A, Geiger-Brown J, Brady B. Work schedule characteristics and reported musculoskeletal disorders of registered nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28(6):394–401.[ISI][Medline]

35. Colditz GA, Martin P, Stampfer MJ, et al. Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123(5):894–900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126(2):319–325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Recall and selection bias in reporting past alcohol consumption among breast cancer cases. Cancer Causes Control. 1993;4(5):441–448.[ISI][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
H. Alamgir, Y. Cvitkovich, S. Yu, and A. Yassi
Work-related injury among direct care occupations in British Columbia, Canada
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2007; 64(11): 769 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
I. Leroux, C. Brisson, and S. Montreuil
Job strain and neck-shoulder symptoms: a prevalence study of women and men white-collar workers
Occup. Med., March 1, 2006; 56(2): 102 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipscomb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Brown, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipscomb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Brown, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Occupational Health


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Public Health Association