|
|
||||||||
LETTER |
Ming Wei is with the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg. Ping Wei is with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ming Wei, MD, MPH, 9 Columbia Drive, Camphill, PA 17011 (e-mail: mingweiw{at}netzero.net).
We read with interest and concern the article "Occupational Risk Factors for Selected Cancers Among African American and White Men in the United States" in the October 2003 issue of the Journal.1 The authors found that in a study with a small number of African American male cases, occupational exposure to chromium was associated with non-Hodgkins lymphoma and exposure to wood dust was associated with Hodgkins disease and soft-tissue sarcoma in African American men. However, in White men, the odds of these occupational exposures among men with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, Hodgkins disease, or soft-tissue sarcoma were almost identical to the odds among the control subjects.1 Since the sample size of White men was more than 10 times the size of the African American sample, the data for White men should generate a more reliable inference.
Although there are different magnitudes of association between risk factors and diseases among racial groups,2,3 few biological risk factors cause a specific cancer in 1 race but not in another race. In addition, the incidences of non-Hodgkins lymphoma and Hodgkins disease are lower in African American men than in White men in the United States, though the overall cancer incidence for African American men is about 24% higher than that of White men.2,3 It is unlikely that racial predispositions play a major role in the occurrence of these cancers.
The chemical natures of chromium and wood dust are harmful to human cells, but the results of their associations with lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma are inconsistent.47 For example, significantly increased risks for both non-Hodgkins lymphoma and Hodgkins disease among White firefighters but not among African American firefighters have been reported.5
Because of the retrospective method used in this casecontrol study, a racial disparity in recall bias might exist. A comparison of the odds ratios of occupational exposures for these selected cancers in presumptive cases denied by pathological review with those in confirmed cases in both races may provide some clues.
The authors suggested that the results may reflect racial disparities in levels of exposure to occupational carcinogens. But we could not find in the article any results to support the hypothesis that exposure levels were higher in African American men than in White men. Do the authors have such data? We hope that better-designed studies in the future can test this hypothesis.
References
1. Briggs NC, Levine RS, Hall HI, Cosby O, Brann EA, Hennekens CH. Occupational risk factors for selected cancers among African American and White men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:17481752.
2. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:526.
3. Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:326341.
4. Kauppinen T, Pukkala E, Saalo A, Sasco AJ. Exposure to chemical carcinogens and risk of cancer among Finnish laboratory workers. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44:343350.[ISI][Medline]
5. Ma F, Lee DJ, Fleming LE, Dosemeci M. Racespecific cancer mortality in US firefighters: 19841993. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:11341138.[ISI][Medline]
6. Mao Y, Hu J, Ugnat AM, White K. Non-Hodgkins lymphoma and occupational exposure to chemicals in Canada. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(suppl 1):6973.
7. Partanen T, Kauppinen T, Luukkonen R, Hakulinen T, Pukkala E. Malignant lymphomas and leukemias, and exposures in the wood industry: an industry-based case-referent study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;64:593596.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hemila and P. Louhiala Vitamin C may affect lung infections J R Soc Med, November 1, 2007; 100(11): 495 - 498. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |