|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Margaret OBrien Caughy is with the Houston School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Dallas. At the time of this research, Patricia J. OCampo was with the Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md, and Carles Muntaner was with the Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Margaret OBrien Caughy, University of Texas School of Public Health, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9129 (email: margaret.caughy{at}utsouthwestern.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives. We examined the relationship between parents experiences of racism and childrens well-being and the influence of the residential neighborhood characteristics on this relationship.
Methods. African American families were recruited from Baltimore neighborhoods. Parental measures included racism experiences and coping. Neighborhood measures included demographic characteristics, social cohesion, and social climate. Childrens mental health was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist. Analysis was performed with multilevel modeling.
Results. Parents who denied experiences of racism also reported higher rates of behavior problems among their preschool-aged children. For families living in neighborhoods characterized by fear of victimization, parents who actively coped with racism experiences by confronting the person involved or taking some sort of action in response to racism reported lower rates of anxiety and depression for their preschool-aged children.
Conclusions. Experiences of and responses to racism among African American parents have important effects on the well-being of their young children.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The identification of pathways by which experiences of interpersonal racism lead to adverse health outcomes is still an exploratory area of research.13 The measurement of racism is also in its infancy, and currently no comprehensive measures capture all aspects of experiences of interpersonal racial discrimination.14 Although reporting discriminatory experiences is associated with greater levels of adverse outcomes, denying actual discrimination may result in equal or greater levels of adverse health effects as those associated with reporting discrimination.2,10,15 Denial of racism (e.g., denying the existence of racism experience by oneself or by others of ones own racial group6,16) is a way of coping that, it has been suggested, leads to poor physical and mental health.6,1517 Evidence suggests that more than 90% of African Americans who report having no experiences of discrimination have nevertheless been discriminated against, if discrimination is measured with objective indicators.18 Thus, research on experiences of discrimination should examine those who report racism experiences as well as those who report no racism experiences.15
Because the study of racism is new to the field of public health, previous research into questions of how parental experiences of racism might affect the well-being of African American children is nonexistent. One mechanism by which such parental experiences may affect the well-being of preschool-age African American children is through racial socialization strategies,1920 defined as "specific messages and practices that provide information concerning the nature of race status."20(pp401402) African American parents who emphasize the development of cultural pride in their preschoolers report lower levels of problem behaviors, especially anxiety or withdrawal, in these children.21 Because racial socialization is how African Americans educate their children to perceive themselves as part of the larger society, the degree to which denial of racism reflects a specific perspective of African American identity might be expected to produce differences in racial socialization practices and, in turn, to differences in child mental health status.
One limitation of current racism research is that it has yet to integrate psychosocial mechanisms with neighborhood characteristics. Analytic techniques integrating mechanisms involving 2 levels have been applied to child behavioral outcomes.2226 Kalff et al.25 reported that after parental socioeconomic status (SES) was taken into account, relative neighborhood poverty was associated with higher rates of child behavioral problems. A study of Chinese Americans found that interpersonal and neighborhood racial discrimination were predictive of poor health status.27 However, no studies have used a multilevel framework to integrate self-perceived and residential-area characteristics in the prediction of mental health outcomes among African Americans adults or children.7
We sought to explore the relation between childrens mental health and neighborhood characteristics, parental experiences of interpersonal racism, parental coping behaviors, and parental racial socialization practices. We addressed the following questions: (1) What is the prevalence of reported racism experiences among African Americans living in an urban setting? (2) What is their typical response to these experiences? (3) Are differences in behavioral and emotional responses to acknowledged racism experiences among African American parents associated with differences in the socioemotional well-being of their pre-school-aged children?
We hypothesized that parental self-reported experiences of and responses to racism would affect the childs socioemotional development through effects on the parents racial socialization strategies. We also aimed to address another research question: Do neighborhood conditions affect the prevalence of reported racism experiences, responses to racism, or racisms effect on the socioemotional well-being of children?
| METHOD |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80% African American,
80% European American, racially mixed). Two census tracts were chosen from each stratum, and 13 block groups were chosen as study neighborhoods from each selected tract. We used census block groups to define neighborhoods, because block groups are more homogeneous than census tracts.28 The number of block groups chosen was not constant, because the number of block groups varied per tract, and the racial composition of block groups was not always consistent with the composition of the tract. Block groups resembled Baltimore overall, except for racial composition. The average proportion of African Americans was higher among study block groups than in the city (85.7% vs 61.9%; t=6.76, P<.01). African American families with children 34 years old were recruited through door-to-door canvassing, targeted mailings, day-care centers, and Head Start programs. Participants had lived in their block group for at least 6 months. Refusals were minimal (<5%), and the number of participants per block group averaged 5.13 (range 116). Two home visits with 200 families were conducted, each lasting 2.5 hours on average. In each family, the primary caregiver of the target child (hereafter referred to as the "parent") was interviewed.
Measures
Data were collected at both the block group and the family level. Block group variables included SES, proportion African American, crime density, social cohesion, and negative social climate. Using all block groups in the city, we standardized each variable, and the component variables were averaged.
Socioeconomic status was assessed with a measure of neighborhood impoverishment29 (combined poverty, unemployment, and vacant housing rates) and the proportion of single-headed households with children younger than 5 years, as derived from 1997 projections of 1990 census data provided by Claritas/National Planning Data Corporation. African American densitythe proportion of the population that was African Americanwas also based on these data. Crime density was defined as the number of crimes per square mile, as recorded by the police department.
Neighborhood social cohesion and negative social climate were assessed with the Neighborhood Environment for Children Rating Scales (NECRS)30 and with a measure of psychological sense of community.3132 Three sub-scales of the NECRS were used as indicators of neighborhood social cohesion: willingness of adults in the neighborhood to intervene in acts of delinquency (stop delinquency), to intervene in acts of child misbehavior (stop misbehavior), and to assist children in need (assist). The internal reliability coefficients for these subscales are .90, .85, and .81, respectively. Three additional subscales of the NECRS were used as indicators of neighborhood negative social climate: perceived physical/social disorder, fear of retaliation, and fear of victimization. The internal reliability coefficients for these subscales are .92, .90, and .94, respectively.
Psychological sense of community was used as a measure of social cohesion. A 13-item scale assessed the respondents perceived sense of membership, shared emotional connection, and degree of mutual influence in the neighborhood. The reliability and validity of this instrument is reported elsewhere.3334 In previously published research, we reported a factor analysis resulting in 2 factors: general psychological sense of community and social knowledge of ones neighbors.35 Findings indicated that very low knowledge of ones neighbors, as represented by the lowest quartile, was an important predictor of child behavior problems. Therefore, we used this binary variable in the current analysis.
Family variables included family SES, parental denial of racism, racism coping strategies, and child behavior problems. SES measures included family poverty level and parental education. Family poverty was defined by family income adjusted for family size as a proportion of the federal poverty level. Parental education was categorical: less than high school, high school diploma or equivalent, and more than high school.
Parent racial socialization strategies were measured with the Parents Experience of Racial Socialization (PERS) Scale (Stevenson H, PhD, Pennsylvania State University; unpublished material, 2001), adapted for use with parents of preschoolers. The scale consists of 40 items that asked parents how often they communicate particular messages to their children. We limited this analysis to the racial pride factor, because our previous work has demonstrated that racial pride alone is associated with child behavioral well-being after adjustment for general level of parent involvement.21 The racial pride factor has an internal reliability coefficient of .76.
Assessment of racism involved 2 measures: denial of experience of racial discrimination and parental coping strategies in response to racism. These measures were assessed with 2 components of the Racism and Life Experiences Scales (RaLES).36 We used the 4 RaLES-B questions that provided the most direct assessment of racism experiences to create an overall index of denial of racism. (The instruments used are available from the corresponding author.) The response set for each question was a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("not at all," "never") to 5 ("extremely," "every time"). We counted the number of items to which the respondent answered "not at all," resulting in an index ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores reflecting greater denial of racism. We further divided this overall index into 2 indexes that differed in terms of referent. Denial of racism to self counted the number of "not at all" responses to the first 2 questions (lifetime racism experience and experiences during the past year). Denial of racism toward other African Americans counted the number of "not at all" responses to the third and fourth questions (effect of racism on others of ones same racial or ethnic group and on friends or family). Nine items from the RaLES were used to measure coping responses to racism experiences. Emotional coping included the first 6 items, and behavioral coping included the remaining 3 items. These scales have internal reliability coefficients of .68 and .53, respectively.
Child mental health status was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist.37 The Child Behavior Checklist yields scores for internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety, depression, withdrawal) and externalizing problems (e.g., aggression), as well as a score for total problem behaviors. Raw scores were converted to t scores; higher scores indicate a greater number and more severe problem behaviors.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We observed no differences in the prevalence of reported racism by family poverty status and only moderate differences by parent education or employment status (
2 = 8.97 and 8.01, respectively; P<.10). The rate of denial was slightly higher among individuals with a high school education and among individuals who were currently unemployed but had been employed within the past 5 years. In both cases, this difference appeared to be a function of denying personal racism experiences, as opposed to denying racism experiences of friends or family or of African Americans in general.
Responses to Racism Experiences
We examined variations in coping responses to racism among respondents who reported personal experiences of racism within the past year or sometime during their lifetimes(n=155). The average score for the emotional response scale was 2.59 (SD=0.63), and the average behavioral response scale score was 2.99 (SD=0.80). No differences in responses to racism experiences were associated with poverty, educational, or employment status.
Parental Racism Experiences and Child Behavior Problems
Average Child Behavior Checklist scores for each level of racism denial are shown in Table 2
. Higher denial was associated with higher total problem behavior scores and higher externalizing problem scores. Post hoc comparisons indicated that this association was driven primarily by a higher rate of behavior problems among children whose parents denied 34 items than among children whose parents denied none of the items. The pattern of results differed according to the referent (self vs other African Americans). No differences in the rate of behavior problems in children were associated with the parents report of personal racism experiences. By contrast, the rate of behavior problems (especially internalizing problems such as depression and anxiety) was significantly higher among children whose parents denied that racism affected those close to them or African Americans in general.
|
Racism and Child Behavior Problems in the Neighborhood Context
Multilevel linear regression analysis was used to examine joint influence of parental responses to racism, parental racial socialization practices, and block group conditions on child behavior problems. Among Child Behavior Checklist problem behaviors, only internalizing behavior showed significant between-block group variance. After we adjusted for between-block group differences in family SES, the intraclass correlation for internalizing behaviors was .17 (t=2.12, P<.05)that is, approximately 17% of the variance in internalizing problems was between block groups, with the remaining 83% between children.
Because depression or anxiety was the only outcome showing significant between-block group variance, multilevel regression analyses were limited to this outcome. In addition to variables significant in preliminary analyses, we included an interaction between the psychological sense of community variable "knows few neighbors" (very low knowledge of neighbors) and neighborhood impoverishment, because our previous work had indicated that the interaction between these 2 variables was an important predictor of symptoms of depression and anxiety.35 The results of the multilevel regression analysis are displayed in Table 3
. In the first model, the individual-level variables (denial of racism to others, behavioral responses to racism, and "knows few neighbors") were entered. Only behavioral response to racism was significant, with parents who took an active behavioral response to racism reporting fewer child problems with anxiety and depression.
|
After control for individual variables, only fear of victimization was associated with more internalizing problems. In model 6, we tested the interaction between neighborhood victimization and parental behavioral response to racism; this interaction was significant. As can be seen in Figure 1
, in block groups in which fear of victimization was low, parental behavioral responses to racism were unrelated to symptoms of depression or anxiety among children. However, in high-fear block groups, behavioral response by parents to racism appeared to protect children against anxiety and depression.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some respondents reported not experiencing racial discrimination, a response that has been associated with poor outcomes. Although it is possible that respondents who denied experiencing racism never did encounter racism, this possibility does not seem a likely explanation for the majority of respondents.39 In fact, parents who denied experiencing racism had the highest behavioral problems among their children. On the other hand, parents who reported actively coping with racism experiences by confronting the person involved or taking some sort of action in response to racism also reported fewer behavioral problems in their children. Our results support Kriegers hypothesis of the harmful effects of denial of racism on health, first tested with hypertension,2,10,39 by testing the hypothesis with child mental health outcomes.
Our hypothesis that the effect of parental experiences of and coping with racism on child mental health status would be mediated by parental racial socialization strategies was not supported. Future research should include a wide variety of parenting factors to elucidate the pathways through which experiences of racism affect childrens mental health.
We examined several neighborhood characteristics in relation to child mental health: neighborhood impoverishment, proportion African American, crime density, social cohesion, and negative social climate. Only negative social climate, especially fear of victimization, was associated with child symptoms of depression and anxiety. We examined psychological sense of community as reported by respondents and found that this factor was not associated with child mental health after other individual factors were controlled. This result is in contrast to our previous findings,35 specifically that lack of knowledge of ones neighbors was associated with better mental health outcomes for children in low-income neighborhoods. This difference in findings may have resulted from the fact that our previous study had not considered joint effects of behavioral responses to racism and psychological sense of community.
We found that behavioral responses to racial discrimination were protective only in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of fear of victimization. We can only speculate about possible psychosocial mechanisms behind this association. Some studies of African American women living in urban areas have found evidence of joint effects of interpersonal discrimination and neighborhood stressors on poor health.4042 Therefore, active coping in the face of interpersonal discrimination might be particularly protective for parents exposed to stressful neighborhood environments, such as those identified by our fear of victimization indicator.
Limitations in our analyses should be noted. First, given the cross-sectional design of the study, the timing of racism experiences relative to the occurrence of adverse child mental health could not be established. Future research should collect information on the timing of the onset of childrens mental health problems, as well as on experiences of racial discrimination in specific narrow periods (e.g., while the child was an infant) corresponding to key developmental periods of child development.
More comprehensive measures are needed in this area. Although we included a variety of neighborhood characteristics beyond economic indicators,43 our measures did not include indicators of discrimination at the neighborhood level, such as segregation and redlining, which have been associated with self-reported health.27 Such indicators may have added information regarding the types of social environments that have an impact on individual-level discrimination or child mental health.
The strengths of our study, however, are numerous. We studied a sample of African American families of diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and neighborhoods. We included a wide selection of information on both individual and neighborhood correlates of child mental health, minimizing the possibility that our results would be affected by confounding of unmeasured factors. In addition, the multilevel analysis design allowed us to demonstrate the contextual nature of the health effects of experiencing racism: parental responses to racism experiences are important for childrens mental health, but neighborhood social environment matters as well.
This study contributes to our understanding of how we might improve the mental health of preschool-aged children.44 Acknowledging racism is related to better child mental health outcomes, as is acting on experiences of racial discrimination. Furthermore, the fact that this association was dependent on characteristics of the neighborhoods in which families lived underscores the importance of incorporating characteristics of the community into all studies of child mental health.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Deborah Brothers and Bennette Drummond-Fitzgerald for conducting interviews and Kimberly Lohrfink for providing project management. Data management and analysis support was expertly provided by YiHua Chen, Crystal Evans, Patricia Gwayi-Chore, and LiChing Lee. Finally, we thank the families who so graciously welcomed us into their homes.
Human Participant Protection
The project protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at both the University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29:295352.[ISI][Medline]
3. Krieger N. Discrimination and health. In Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2000:3675.
4. Williams DR. Race and health. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;7:322333.[ISI][Medline]
5. Muntaner C, Nieto J, OCampo P. The bell curve: on race, social class and epidemiologic research. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:531536.
6. Jones JM. Prejudice and Racism. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill; 1997.
7. Williams DR, Williams-Morris R. Racism and mental health. Ethn Health. 2000;5:243268.[ISI][Medline]
8. AcevedoGarcia D. Zip codelevel risk factors for tuberculosis: neighborhood environment and residential segregation in New Jersey, 19851992. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:734741.[Abstract]
9. Williams DR, Collins C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:404416.[ISI][Medline]
10. Krieger N, Sidney S. Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA Study of young black and white adults. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:13701378.
11. Williams D, Yu Y, Jackson J, Anderson N. Racial differences in physical and mental health: socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. J Health Psychol. 1997;2:335351.[Abstract]
12. Dressler W. Lifestyle, stress, and blood pressure in a southern black community. Psychosom Med. 1990;52:182198.
13. Williams DR., Neighbors HW, Jackson JS. Racial/ ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:200209.
14. Meyer IH. Prejudice as stress: conceptual and measurement problems. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:262265.
15. Harrell JP, Hall S, Taliaferro J. Physiological responses to racism and discrimination: an assessment of the evidence. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:243248.
16. Cose E. The Rage of a Privileged Class. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 1993.
17. Williams DR, Neighbors H. Racism, discrimination and hypertension: evidence and needed research. Ethn Dis. 2001;11:800816.[Medline]
18. Darity WA. Employment discrimination, segregation, and health. Paper presented at: "Racial/Ethnic Bias and Health," Conference of the National Institutes of Health; April 1819, 2002; Vienna, Va.
19. Garcia Coll C, Lamberty G, Jenkins R, et al. An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Dev. 1996;67:18911914.[ISI][Medline]
20. Thornton MC, Chatters LM, Taylor RJ, Allen WR. Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of racial socialization by black parents. Child Dev. 1990;61:401409.[ISI][Medline]
21. Caughy MO, OCampo PJ, Randolph SM, Nickerson K. The influence of racial socialization practices on the cognitive and behavioral competence of African American preschoolers. Child Dev. 2002;73:16111625.[ISI][Medline]
22. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:309337.[ISI][Medline]
23. Duncan GJ, Raudenbush SW. Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychology. 1999;34:2941.
24. Kohen DE, Brooks-Gunn J, Leventhal T, Hertzmann C. Neighborhood income and physical and social disorder in Canada: associations with young childrens competencies. Child Dev. 2002;73:18441860.[ISI][Medline]
25. Kalff A, Kroes M, Vles J, et al. Neighborhood-level and individual-level SES effects on child problem behavior: a multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:246250.
26. Sampson RJ. Family management and child development: insights from social disorganization theory. In: McCord J, ed. Facts, Frameworks, and Forecasts. Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1992:6393.
27. Gee GC. A multilevel analysis of the relationship between institutional and individual racial discrimination and health status. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:615623.
28. Krieger N. Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991;45:3542.[Abstract]
29. Korbin J, Coulton CJ. Understanding the neighborhood context for children and families: combining epidemiological and ethnographic approaches. In: Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ, Aber JL, eds. Neighborhood Poverty: Policy Implications in Studying Neighborhoods. Vol 2. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997:6579.
30. Coulton CJ, Korbin JE, Su M. Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. Am J Community Psychol. 1996;24:533.[ISI]
31. Linney JA, Wandersman A. Prevention Plus IIIAssessing Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Programs at the School and Community Level: A Four-Step Guide to Useful Program Assessment. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1991. Publication ADM 91-1871.
32. McMillan D, Chavis D. Sense of community: a definition and theory. Am J Community Psychol. 1986;14:623.
33. Chavis DM, Pretty GMH. Sense of community: advances in measurement and application. J Community Psychol. 1999;27:635642.[ISI]
34. Chipuer HM, Pretty GMH. A review of the sense of community index: current uses, factor structure, reliability and further development. J Community Psychol. 1999;27:643658.[ISI]
35. Caughy MO, OCampo PJ, Muntaner C. When being alone might be better: neighborhood poverty, social capital, and child behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003:57:227237.
36. Harrel SP, Merchant, MA, Young, SA. Psychometric properties of the Racism and Life Experiences Scales (RaLES). Paper presented at: the American Psychological Association; April 1519, 1997; Chicago, IL.
37. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist. Burlington, Vt: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
38. Ruggiero KM, Mitchell JP, Krieger N, Marx DM, Lorenzo ML. Now you see it, now you dont: explicit versus implicit measures of the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:511514.[ISI][Medline]
39. Krieger N. Racial and gender discrimination: risk factors for high blood pressure? Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:12731281.
40. Schulz A, Israel B, Williams D, et al. Social inequalities, stressors and self-reported health status among African American and white women in the Detroit metropolitan area. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:16391653.
41. Schultz A, Israel B, Williams D, et al. Unfair treatment, neighborhood effects, and mental health in the Detroit metropolitan area. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41:314332.[ISI][Medline]
42. Israel BA, Farquhar SA, Schulz AJ, James SA, Parker EA. The relationship between social support, stress, and health among women on Detroits East Side. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29:342360.
43. Sampson RJ. Linking the micro and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces. 1991;70:4364.
44. Van Ausdale D, Feagin J. The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racism. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Nettles, M. O. Caughy, and P. J. O'Campo School Adjustment in the Early Grades: Toward an Integrated Model of Neighborhood, Parental, and Child Processes Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2008; 78(1): 3 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-A. Suizzo, C. Robinson, and E. Pahlke African American Mothers' Socialization Beliefs and Goals With Young Children: Themes of History, Education, and Collective Independence Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 287 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Brown, A. Hernandez, G. Saint-Jean, S. Evans, I. Tafari, L. G. Brewster, M. J. Celestin, C. Gomez-Estefan, F. Regalado, S. Akal, et al. A Participatory Action Research Pilot Study of Urban Health Disparities Using Rapid Assessment Response and Evaluation Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Noh, V. Kaspar, and K.A.S. Wickrama Overt and Subtle Racial Discrimination and Mental Health: Preliminary Findings for Korean Immigrants Am J Public Health, July 1, 2007; 97(7): 1269 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Gee, J. Delva, and D. T. Takeuchi Relationships Between Self-Reported Unfair Treatment and Prescription Medication Use, Illicit Drug Use, and Alcohol Dependence Among Filipino Americans Am J Public Health, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 933 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Gee, A. Ryan, D. J. Laflamme, and J. Holt Self-Reported Discrimination and Mental Health Status Among African Descendants, Mexican Americans, and Other Latinos in the New Hampshire REACH 2010 Initiative: The Added Dimension of Immigration Am J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 96(10): 1821 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Paradies A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 888 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Gee, J. Chen, M. S. Spencer, S. See, O. A. Kuester, D. Tran, and D. Takeuchi Social Support as a Buffer for Perceived Unfair Treatment Among Filipino Americans: Differences Between San Francisco and Honolulu Am J Public Health, April 1, 2006; 96(4): 677 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |