|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Nina Wallerstein, Bonnie M. Duran, Jolene Aguilar, and Lorenda Joe are with the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque. Felipita Loretto, Anita Toya, and Harriet Yepa-Waquie are with Department of Health and Human Services, Jemez Pueblo, NM. Randy Padilla is with Senior Citizens Center, Jemez Pueblo. Kevin Shendo is with Education Department, Jemez Pueblo.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Bonnie M. Duran, DrPH, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, #147, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (e-mail: bonduran{at}unm.edu).
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Pueblo of Jemez is situated in rural New Mexico. More than 90% of its nearly 3400 members speak the Towa language. The unemployment rate is 27%, and 30% of all heads of households are not high school graduates. Most of those who are employed work in tribal services or in nearby cities.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With approvals from tribal leadership, the University of New Mexico team developed a tribal advisory committee, which co-developed the instruments. Informants were identified by sectors: elders, youth, spiritual leaders, political leaders, health, environment, and education.19 Thirty-seven people participated in 5 focus groups; 30 were interviewed. We used a modified grounded theory approach19 and worked with the advisory committee to analyze qualitative data. Although the built environment was not the research focus, we found that issues of housing, land use, and cultural practice were interconnected with community health.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1
presents 3 built environment issues raised at Jemez: housing, Red Rocks development, and program development. For tribal leadership, these issues raise competing pressures for cultural preservation, economic development, family needs, community priorities, and, ultimately, health.
|
Although the consensus is that extended family living is culturally appropriate, there are health and privacy concerns. "A lot of adults and families living in one house . . . that causes a lot of stress." Overcrowding prompts families to want to build on family farmlands, which is discouraged by the tribal council because of water rights litigation. "If we cant build homes on our farmland, where else are we going to build?"
Some tribal members want new housing at the edge of the village: "People with tribal enterprises need space." Others fear loss of cohesiveness with building homes far from the village center. "I just hope we dont get into developments like you see in the cities, like apartments." "New homes separate the pueblo life."
Red Rocks Development
Outside the village is the beautiful Red Rocks area, which hosts a tourist museum, convenience store, and food booths. A planned road bypass around the village to Red Rocks is a strategy to maintain tribal community: "Its nice we dont get the intruders. . . . Thats what pulls our people together because we try to keep our traditions alive." "I totally support the bypass, for people to survive for the next 1000 years." However, this planned development creates tension among families who sell arts and crafts from their homes.
Economic development with health planning also remains a challenge. The convenience store employs tribal members and brings in revenue, but it is too far from the pueblo to walk, and it offers processed, convenience foods. "It would be nice if we could buy fresh vegetables, fruits. . . . Its more like fast food, fat foods."
Program and Facilities Expansion
Jemez is not a gaming tribe; it relies on federal resources for much-needed programs. A significant contribution to the built environment has been new health, senior, and youth facilities. Although proud of the infrastructure growth, program staff are concerned about potential decline in community participation as more people relate to tribal government as service recipients. On the other hand, tribal members appreciate participating in health programs linked to their culture: "You always greet people on the [health] walks . . . people like that." "We have more prevention programs, [which] continue in our Indian way . . . elders teach our young."
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Human Participant Protection
The University of New Mexico Health Science Center human research review committee approved this study. The Jemez Pueblo health board and tribal council approved the study and this publication.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 8, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Yen I, Syme L. The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiology literature. Annu Rev Public Health.1999;20:287308.[ISI][Medline]
3. Massey DS, Denton NA. Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography.1989;26:373391.[ISI][Medline]
4. Krieger J, Higgins DL. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health.2002;92:758768.
5. Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1987:xi, 254.
6. Jackson RJ, Kochtitzky C, Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse. Creating a Healthy Environment: The Impact of the Built Environment on Public Health. Washington, DC: Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse; 2001:19. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse Monograph Series.
7. Cummins SK, Jackson RJ. The built environment and childrens health. Pediatr Clin North Am.2001;48:12411252.[ISI][Medline]
8. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: Americas declining social capital. J Democracy.1993;6:6578.
9. Lochner K, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place.1999;5:259270.[ISI][Medline]
10. Lindstrom M, Merlo J, Ostergren PO. Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: a multilevel analysis of the city of Malmo, Sweden. Soc Sci Med.2002;54:17791791.
11. Baum FE, Bush RA, Modra CC, et al. Epidemiology of participation: an Australian community study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:414423.
12. Lindstrom M, Hanson BS, Ostergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med.2001;52:441451.
13. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science.1997;277:918924.
14. Parker EA, Lichtenstein RL, Schulz AJ, et al. Disentangling measures of individual perceptions of community social dynamics: results of a community survey. Health Educ Behav.2001;28:462486.
15. Goodman RM, Speers MA, McLeroy K, et al. Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav.1998;25:258278.[Abstract]
16. Jackson P, Penrose J, Association of American Geographers. Meeting: Constructions of Race, Place, and Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1994:viii, 216.
17. Gesler WM, Kearns RA. Culture Place Health: Critical Geographies. London, England: Routledge; 2002:xi, 182.
18. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2003:xxxiii, 490.
19. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, Ill: Aldine Publishing Co; 1967:x, 271.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. B. Wallerstein and B. Duran Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2006; 7(3): 312 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |