HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, J. J.

J. J. Chen, PhD

John J. Chen is with the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should go to John J. Chen, PhD, Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, HSC L-3, Rm. 086, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036 (e-mail: john.chen{at}stonybrook.edu).

With the availability of statistical software packages, more and more complex statistical models can be easily applied to research data. It is crucial that care be taken when communicating complex information from these statistical models. Just like in a general linear model analysis, where the coefficient for an interaction term does not have a "slope" interpretation, when an interaction effect is included in a multiple logistic regression model, the odds ratios (ORs) based on coefficient estimates are not all meaningful, and the correct ORs to report need to be recalculated.

In a recent article, Forsyth et al.¹ studied the effect of HIV voluntary counseling and testing on reproduction planning among adults in 2 developing countries. A statistical interaction between pregnancy intention at baseline and HIV serostatus was included in the logistic regression models and was found to be statistically significant among women. The authors reported an OR of 0.1 for the interaction effect and stated that the women more likely to be pregnant were not using contraceptives (OR = 0.1) and were HIV infected (OR = 3.0), whereas partner pregnancy rates were not different by HIV serostatus among men. The article concluded that "HIV diagnosis may influence reproduction planning for women but not for men."

Based on Tables 3 and 5, the logistic regression model is of the following form:

(1)

where ßs are logistic regression coefficients and I_planned is an indicator variable that equals 1 when the woman is planning a pregnancy; it equals 0 when she is not. Same for I_infected, an indicator variable for HIV infected nor not.

On the basis of the results (Table 3), the estimates of the coefficients for the multiple logistic regression model for women were:

(2)

(3)

(4)

Because of the interaction effect, the meaningful ORs for comparisons need to be derived as follows. For women who were not planning a pregnancy, the odds ratio for those with HIV infection versus without infection is

(5)

For women who were planning a pregnancy, the odds ratio for those with HIV infection versus without is

(6)

For women who were not HIV infected, the odds ratio for women who were planning a pregnancy versus those who were not is

(7)

For women who were infected, the odds ratio for women who were planning a pregnancy versus those who were not is

(8)

For a comparison of women who were infected and were planning a pregnancy versus those who were not infected and were not planning a pregnancy, the odds ratio is

(9)

Whether women who were more likely to be pregnant were not using contraceptives seems to depend on their HIV infection status; whether they were more likely to be HIV infected depends on their pregnancy planning status.

Similarly, based on Table 5, the corresponding estimates of coefficients for men were

(10)

(11)

(12)

and the corresponding ORs for partner pregnancy can be calculated as

Even though the statistical significance of these comparisons will depend on the correlations among the coefficient estimates, which were not available from the article, both men and women seem to show very similar patterns. Among those who were not planning a pregnancy, HIV infection status tended to increase the odds of a pregnancy, whereas among those who had planned a pregnancy, the HIV infection status tended to decrease the odds of a pregnancy.

Care needs to be taken when interpreting and reporting results from complex statistical models. To correctly interpret the results from a multiple logistic regression analysis and arrive at meaningful conclusions, it is crucial that appropriate steps be taken to properly incorporate statistical interaction effect.

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr. M. C. Leske and an anonymous reviewer for their careful comments.

References

1. Forsyth A, Coates T, Grinstead O, et al. HIV infection and pregnancy status among adults attending voluntary counseling and testing in 2 developing countries. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1795–1800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Piette, M. Heisler, S. Krein, and E. A. Kerr The Role of Patient-Physician Trust in Moderating Medication Nonadherence Due to Cost Pressures Arch Intern Med, August 8, 2005; 165(15): 1749 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, J. J.