|
|
||||||||
FIELD ACTION REPORT |
Olugbemiga T. Ekundayo is with the Graduate Public Health Program, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Md. Yvonne Bronner is with the School of Graduate Studies, Morgan State University. Wendy Johnson-Taylor is with the Public Health Program, Morgan State University. Nkossi Dambita is with the Office of Grants, Research, Surveillance and Evaluation, Baltimore City Health Department. Sean Squire is with the Health and Aging Program, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Olugbemiga T. Ekundayo, MD, School of Graduate Studies and Research Public Health Program, Morgan State University, 1500 E Cold Spring Ln, Jenkins Hall, Suite 343, Baltimore, MD 21251 (e-mail: maxima1757{at}aol.com).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We describe an innovative approach for evaluating a mens health center.
Using observation and interview, we assessed patient flow, referral patterns, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of the services usefulness. Student assistants designed evaluation tools, hired and trained research assistants, supervised data collection, interacted with city and center officials, analyzed data, and drafted a report.
To ensure patient confidentiality and anonymity, we designed an innovative observation system. The men had unique perceptions of family, requiring culturally sensitive approaches to engage them in the study. Of patients reporting to the center, 20.3% received referral services. Average satisfaction level was 5.2 (scale = 110).
Perceived benefits to the family for 23% of respondents included cost savings, improved access, and higher service quality.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The center provides services to men who would otherwise not qualify for funded services because they are either too old or too young. The men are either underemployed or unemployed; more serious still, some of them are unemployable men who have been passing through the penal system since they were young. As a result, many have truncated or poorly developed social, economic, and other functional skills, making them poorly prepared to join the workforce.
To evaluate program efficacy and quality with regard to patients, the Baltimore City Health Department commissioned the Morgan State University Public Health Program to do a time-and-motion study and a survey. We assessed patterns of patients arrival into the center, total time spent, time spent waiting, and time spent with service providers. Our survey assessed satisfaction level, referral types, and patients perceptions of how health information and services obtained from the center would be useful to their families.
We surveyed 338 men who entered the center and qualified for services. Management required that the centers environment remain free of a research atmosphere and that the survey respect patients sensitivities and ensure confidentiality. The researchers therefore placed assistants at strategic sites throughout the center to track patients movement and progress through descriptions of their clothing. To determine flow patterns into the center, we recorded patient entry and exit times from each service point. Total times spent in the center waiting area and in each consultation room were recorded, stored in Microsoft Access 1997, and analyzed with Microsoft Excel 1997 (Microsoft Corp. Redmond, Wash). We collected survey data through face-to-face exit interviews. To measure satisfaction, we used a Likert scale of 1 to 10 (10 indicating highest level of satisfaction).
Using a combination of closed and open-ended questions, we recorded data on referral, usefulness, and impact of health education information and other services on family relationships. We performed descriptive statistical analyses of times recorded and domain analyses of survey interview responses related to family. Students obtained institutional review board approval, attended planning and briefing meetings with city health officials, and conducted familiarization sessions with center staff.
| DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
This study indicates that mens cultural sensitivity and competence needs are unique, and more study is required to align policy and programs to these needs. Although not yet thoroughly analyzed, our findings indicate that the way men define "family"4,7 may provide an opportunity to address wider societal issues related to family function (i.e., the social, structural, and functional dynamics of family) and the policies that impact these areas. The center project provided firsthand experience in public health leadership roles for students, especially in the area of program and project evaluation. The dynamics of survey implementation may require a balance between doctrinaire scientific research, time restraints, and the identified needs of the community. The goal will be to ensure scientific validity while maintaining cultural relevance.
KEY FINDINGS
|
| NEXT STEPS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The challenge will be to develop flexible, valid, reliable, low-cost evaluation tools9 for rapidly evolving programs in implementation. If proven effective, they will provide near real-time diagnoses and guidance for policy planners, administrators, and managers in community health, especially in minority populations. Finally, because of the low precision of the survey tools, we could not perform more rigorous analyses and modeling of the data we collected. Designing more precise quantitative and qualitative tools for evaluating programs of this type would provide more sensitive and specific guidance to planners, administrators, and managers.
Overall, the Mens Health Center is a needed and useful program for addressing the unique health care needs of an otherwise disenfranchised and vulnerable population. Ongoing program and client population evaluation will assist such a program to improve its services and make them more responsive to the needs of the population it serves.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Human Participant Protection
Institutional review board approval for this project was obtained from both the Baltimore City Health Department and Morgan State University.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication January 19, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bamgboye E, Jarallah J. Long-waiting outpatients: target audience for health education. Patient Educ Couns. 1994;23:4954.[ISI][Medline]
3. Rondeau K. Managing the center wait: an important quality of care challenge. J Nurs Care Qual. 1998;13(2): 1120.[ISI][Medline]
4. Bronner Y, Dambita N, Ekundayo O, Squire S. Mens Health Center Study. Final Report. Baltimore, Md: Baltimore City Health Department; July 2000: 119.
5. Linder-Pelz S, Streuning E. The multi-dimensionality of patient satisfaction with a center visit. J Community Health. 1985;10:4254.[Medline]
6. Mckinnon K, Crofts P, Edwards R, Campion P, Edwards R. The outpatient experience. results of a patient feedback survey. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11:156 160.[Medline]
7. Zimmerman M, Ramirez-Walles J, Maton K. Resilience among urban African-American male adolescents: a study of protective effects of sociopolitical control on their mental health. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27:733751.[ISI][Medline]
8. Whitehead T, Peterson J, Kaljee J. The "hustle": socioeconomic deprivation, urban drug trafficking, and low-income African-American male gender identity. Pediatrics. 1994;93(6 Pt 2):10501054.
9. Witte K, Donohue WA. Preventing vehicle crashes with trains at grade crossings: the risk seeker challenge. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:127139.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Whitley, N. C. Jarrett, A. M. W. Young, S. A. Adeyemi, and L. M. Perez Building Effective Programs to Improve Men's Health American Journal of Men's Health, December 1, 2007; 1(4): 294 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Treadwell, M. E. Northridge, and T. N. Bethea Confronting Racism and Sexism to Improve Men's Health American Journal of Men's Health, March 1, 2007; 1(1): 81 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |