|
|
||||||||
IMAGES OF HEALTH |
Elizabeth Fee and Roxanne Beatty are with the History of Medicine Division, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Theodore M. Brown is with the Departments of History and of Community and Preventive Medicine at the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Elizabeth Fee, PhD, Building 38, Room 1E21, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 (e-mail: elizabeth_fee{at}nlm.nih.gov).
THIS 16TH-CENTURY WOODCUT shows a pregnant woman sitting in a birthing chair, attended by 3 women, at least 1 of whom (seated, at left) is a midwife. This image was published in Ein schön lustig Trostbüchle von den Empfengknussen und Geburten der Menschen (A Very Cheerful Booklet of Encouragement Concerning the Conception and Birth of Man) in 1554.1 The book was written by Jacob Rueff (15001558), a surgeon and obstetrician in Zurich. Rueff was responsible for the instruction and examination of midwives in Zurich and, indeed, had copies of his book sent to all the midwives in the region.
|
Some version of the birthing stool or chair had been used for millennia, there being evidence of its use in Egyptian papyri and the Old Testament.3,4 The chair shown here incorporates certain early modern technical innovations, such as the sloping back that allows the birthing woman to recline slightly during contractions. One scholar even argues that this birthing chair was itself a technical innovation inspired by male professionals as a way to gain control over the birthing process and to displace earlier practices in which pregnant women sat on the laps of their birth attendants.5 As male midwives and obstetrical attendants gradually wrested control of the birth process from female midwives and from women themselves, the birthing chairs would be replaced by flat beds, these being more convenient to the person in charge of the "delivery."
Birthing chairs are now making something of a comeback in modern obstetrics as case control studies are finding that their use may reduce the pain of childbirth, diminish perineal trauma, decrease the need for episiotomies, and increase the mothers satisfaction with her birthing experience.69
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Rösslin E. Der Swangern Frauwen und Hebammen Rosegarten. 1513. Reprint. Zurich, Switzerland: Verlag Bibliophile Drucke; 1976.
3. Morice P, Josset P, Colau JC. La gynécologie et lobstétrique en Egypt antique. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1994;23:131136.[Medline]
4. ODowd MJ, Philipp EE. The History of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. New York, NY: Parthenon; 1994:7.
5. Gélis J. History of Childhood: Fertility, Pregnancy and Birth in Early Modern Europe. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press; 1991:127130.
6. Shannahan MK, Cottrel BH. The effects of birth chair delivery on maternal perceptions. J Obstet Gynecol Nurs. 1989;18:323326.
7. Olson R, Olson C, Cox NS. Maternal birthing positions and perineal injury. J Fam Pract. 1990;30:553557.[Medline]
8. Waldenstrom U, Gottvall K. A randomized trial of birthing stool or conventional semirecumbent position for second-stage labor. Birth. 1991;18:510.[ISI][Medline]
9. Scholz HS, Benedicic C, Arikan MG, Haas J, Petru E. Spontaneous vaginal delivery in the birth-chair versus in the conventional dorsal position: a matched controlled comparison. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001;113:695697.[Medline]
Read all eLetters
eLetters:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |