| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Maritta S. Jaakkola and Ritva Piipari are with the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. Niina Jaakkola is with the Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki. At the time of the study, Jouni J. K. Jaakkola was with the Environmental Health Program, Nordic School of Public Health, Göteborg, Sweden.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Maritta S. Jaakkola, MD, DSc, Institute of Occupational Health, the University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom (e-mail: M.Jaakkola{at}bham.ac.uk).
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
Objectives. The authors assessed the effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) on the development of asthma in adults.
Methods. In the Pirkanmaa district of South Finland, all 21- to 63-year-old adults with new cases of asthma diagnosed during a 2.5-year period (n = 521 case patients, out of 441 000 inhabitants) and a random sample of control subjects from the source population (932 control subjects) participated in a population-based incident case–control study.
Results. Risk of asthma was related to workplace ETS exposure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26, 3.72) and home exposure (OR = 4.77; 95% CI = 1.29, 17.7) in the past year. Cumulative ETS exposure over a lifetime at work and at home increased the risk.
Conclusions. This study indicates for the first time that both cumulative lifetime and recent ETS exposures increase the risk of adult-onset asthma.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
Only 6 studies have addressed the question of ETS and asthma in adulthood,6–11 indicating an increased risk of asthma in relation to ETS exposure at home,7,10,11 at work,6,9 or both.8 Most of these studies were vulnerable to selection and information bias because of cross-sectional designs or asthma diagnosis being based on self-report. In addition, Robbins and colleagues12 reported a study on ETS and airway obstructive disease, including both asthma cases and cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, that was based on the same study population of Californian Seventh Day Adventists as the study by Greer et al. that focused on asthma.6 Stronger evidence of the causal role of ETS exposure in asthma among the working population would support more strict preventive measures and health policies in workplaces.
We conducted a large population-based study in South Finland to assess the effect of ETS exposure in the workplace and at home on the development of asthma in the working-age population. We recruited all adults with new cases of asthma in a population of approximately 441 000 people over 2.5 years.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
Definition and Selection of Case Patients
We systematically recruited all individuals with new cases of asthma, first in the city of Tampere, beginning on September 15, 1997, and then from March 10, 1998, to March 31, 2000, in the whole Pirkanmaa Hospital District. Patients were recruited at all health care facilities diagnosing asthma, including the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at the Tampere University Hospital and offices of the privately practicing pulmonary physicians in the region, as well as public health care centers. To ensure the participation of those asthma patients not caught by our screening system, the National Social Insurance Institution of Finland carried out a computerized search of all patients who had received reimbursement for asthma medications for the first time during the period from September 1, 1997, through May 1, 1999, and who had not yet been recruited.
The diagnostic criteria for asthma included a history of at least one asthma-like symptom (prolonged cough, wheezing, attacks of or exercise-induced dyspnea, or nocturnal cough or wheezing) and demonstration of reversible airway obstruction in lung function investigations.13,14 The health care facilities were responsible for reporting the cases to us. Our research nurse was based at the Tampere University Hospital, and the cases were reported to her immediately when they were identified. At the Tampere University Hospital, patients were recruited at their first visit resulting from suspected asthma, and the diagnosis was verified in clinical examinations. At the other health care facilities, patients were recruited immediately when the asthma diagnosis was verified.
The National Social Insurance Institution contacted patients 6 months to 2 years after their diagnosis was established. For these patients, the date and criteria of the asthma diagnosis were confirmed from their medical records so that the diagnoses of asthma patients included in our study fulfilled our criteria. Eligible subjects were invited to participate in the study, and their informed consent was requested by their physician or through a letter sent by the National Social Insurance Institution. The medical records of all patients were checked, and only those with no previous history of diagnosed asthma or long-term use of asthma medication were included in the study.
A total of 362 patients (response rate 90%) participated through the health care system, and 159 patients participated through the National Social Insurance Institution (response rate 78%), totaling 521 patients. After current and previous smokers had been excluded, the study population comprised 239 asthma patients. We compared the patients identified through different sources, health care facilities, and the National Social Insurance Institution according to the characteristics listed in Table 1
and according to the exposure distributions in Table 2. There were no major differences between the patients identified through the various sources.
|
|
Exposure Assessment
Exposure assessment was based on questionnaire information on exposure to ETS during the past 12 months and a time-exposure matrix for lifetime exposure both at home and at work. For each age period (0–1, 1–6, 7–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–30, 31–40, and 
41years), individuals were asked about number of cigarettes per day and duration of exposure during the period. In the case of individuals exposed to cigar or pipe smoking, values were converted, with 1 cigar or pipeful of tobacco corresponding to 1 cigarette.
Measurement Methods
Questionnaire.
The self-administered questionnaire, modified from the Helsinki Office Environment Study questionnaire for use in general populations,15,16 included 6 sections: personal characteristics, health information, active smoking and ETS exposure, occupation and work environment, home environment, and dietary questions.
Lung function measurements. The same diagnostic protocol was applied for all patients with suspected asthma.13,14 The only exception was patients recruited through the National Social Insurance Institute, for whom data were obtained through abstraction from medical records.
Baseline spirometry and bronchodilation tests were recorded with a pneumotachograph spirometer connected to a computer and a disposable flow transducer (Medikro 905, Medikro, Kuopio, Finland), according to the standards of the American Thoracic Society.17 Presence of obstruction was judged via reference values derived from a Finnish population.18
The criteria for significant improvement in regard to the bronchodilation test were as follows: a 15% or more improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, a 15% or more improvement in forced vital capacity, and a 23% or more improvement in peak expiratory flow (PEF). All patients underwent PEF follow-up for at least 2 weeks, with a mini-Wright meter performing measurements twice a day. During the second week, measurements were performed before and 15 minutes after patients had taken short-acting bronchodilating medication. Criteria for significant PEF variability included 20% or more daily variations or 15% or more improvement in response to bronchodilating medication during at least 2 days. Those for whom there was a strong suspicion of asthma underwent a 2-week oral steroid treatment if the other diagnostic tests were negative. Patients underwent 2 weeks of PEF follow-up during this treatment, along with a spirometric measurement at the end of the treatment period to judge responses.
Statistical Methods
We used exposure odds ratios (ORs) to quantify the relationship between exposure to ETS and adult-onset asthma. We estimated odds ratios in logistic regression analyses adjusting for gender, age, parental atopy or asthma, education (as an indicator of socioeconomic status), visible mold or mold odor at home or in the workplace, any history of pets in the home, and self-reported occupational exposure to sensitizers, dusts, or fumes (apart from ETS).
We studied the effects of exposure during the past 12 months and cumulative lifetime exposure, focusing on home and work exposures separately and combined. We calculated cumulative exposure by multiplying, for each time period, daily rate of cigarette exposure by duration in years and then summing these values, yielding exposure parameters in cigarette-years. Because ETS exposure during the past 12 months and cumulative ETS exposure may be related, we adjusted for each exposure parameter when assessing the other. We elaborated exposure–response relations by fitting both ordinal scale categorical and continuous exposure variables.
We quantified the effect of exposure as an attributable fraction19 or etiologic fraction20 providing the proportion of exposed case patients for whom the disease was attributable to the exposure.19 We calculated the attributable fraction (AF) as follows:
 | (1) |
where OR is the adjusted odds ratio for the exposure of interest, an unbiased estimate of an incidence ratio in a population-based case–control study.20 We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the corresponding odds ratio interval. Finally, we calculated the attributable fraction for the whole population (AFT)—that is, the fraction of all asthma cases among the working-age population caused by ETS exposure—using the proportion of exposed cases (PE), as follows20:
 | (2) |
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
). Table 2 presents the distributions of ETS exposure in the workplace and at home during the previous 12 months as well as cumulative lifetime ETS exposure. Higher percentages of patients than control subjects reported ETS exposure in the workplace (15.6% vs 9.0%) and at home (3.0% vs 1.7%) during the past year.
ETS Exposure and Risk of Asthma
Risk of asthma was significantly related to total ETS exposure (OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.19, 3.25) and to workplace ETS exposure (OR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.26, 3.72) during the previous 12 months (Table 3). Use of continuous exposure variables revealed statistically significant exposure–response relations for total ETS exposure, with an odds ratio of 1.33 per 10 cigarettes per day (95% CI = 1.02, 1.75), and for workplace ETS exposure, with an odds ratio of 1.44 per 10 cigarettes per day at work (95% CI = 1.03, 2.01). Adjustment for cumulative lifetime exposure slightly lowered the risk estimates. The risk of asthma also increased in relation to home exposure (OR = 4.77), but the confidence interval was wide (95% CI = 1.29, 17.7). The point estimate for the highest exposure category was lower than the estimate for the lower category. Small numbers of subjects exposed at home limited inferences regarding home exposures.
|
presents data on asthma risk according to cumulative lifetime ETS exposure. Although some indication of an exposure–response relation was observed, especially for total cumulative exposure and home exposure, the continuous exposure variables revealed no statistically significant exposure–response relations. Cumulative work exposure appeared to have a stronger effect than home exposure. The risk estimates were slightly lower when we adjusted for exposure during the past 12 months.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
We found that both workplace and total ETS exposures during the past 12 months were significantly related to an increased risk of new asthma in the working-age population. A significant exposure–response pattern was observed in average number of cigarettes individuals were exposed to daily. We also observed an increase in the risk related to home ETS exposure, but the estimate was less precise because of the small number of subjects exposed at home. An indication of a dose-dependent effect was observed with cumulative ETS exposure at home and with total cumulative exposure, although the trends were not statistically significant. The effect of cumulative workplace ETS exposure appeared to be greater than that of home exposure.
The fraction of asthma attributable to ETS exposure during the past year was quite high: 49% among those who were exposed to ETS, or 8% among the whole population. Biologically plausible mechanisms underlying the relation between ETS and asthma have been proposed,4,5 including inflammatory responses of the airways to the irritant compounds of tobacco smoke and an increase in epithelial permeability to environmental allergens.
Validity Issues
We were able to include a high proportion of individuals in the study area with new cases of asthma because of our thorough recruitment strategy, which involved the health care system and the National Social Insurance Institution. The latter provides health care insurance to all citizens of Finland, and its medication files involve practically full coverage of asthma patients in Finland fulfilling our rather strict diagnostic criteria. The response rate among the control subjects was also relatively high. Thus, our study was not likely to have involved any major selection bias.
One of the strengths of our study was the assessment of recent ETS exposure as well as cumulative lifetime exposure in both the home and work environments. The study was introduced to the participants as an investigation of environmental factors in general (the Finnish Environment and Asthma Study), with no special focus on ETS, to reduce information bias in participants’ reports. Information on exposures was collected from patients and control subjects in a similar way.
Development of asthma is likely to take several months to several years after the relevant exposure, and consequently exposure assessment over a long time period is needed21,22; as a result, we concluded that a well-designed questionnaire was the best exposure assessment method for our aims. We included only incident cases of asthma in the study, which diminished concerns related to the potential effects of diagnosed asthma on ETS exposure. Asthma was defined on the basis of objective clinical findings to eliminate information bias concerning the outcome.
We were able to adjust for a number of potential confounders in logistic regression analyses to eliminate these factors as potential explanations for our results. As a means of controlling for genetic predisposition, we adjusted for parental atopy, but not for participants’ own atopy, as it may be part of the causal pathway of effects of ETS.
Synthesis with Previous Knowledge
Our risk estimates for ETS and adult asthma were slightly higher than those of earlier studies,6–11 although the confidence intervals include these previous estimates. There are at least 2 likely explanations for these results. First, we based diagnoses on clinical examinations, including lung function measurements; thus, our criteria were stricter than those of earlier studies that based diagnoses on self-reports.6–8,10,11 Second, earlier studies with cross-sectional designs (including prevalent asthma cases) most likely underestimated risks because of the tendency of subjects with diagnosed asthma to avoid ETS exposure.7,8,10 Some evidence of an exposure–response relationship between ETS exposure and risk of asthma was indicated in 3 earlier studies,7,8,10 but our study was the first to investigate the effects of cumulative ETS exposure.
|
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank all of the physicians and nurses who participated in recruiting the study subjects at the Tampere University Hospital, the health care centers, and private practices. We would also like to thank the National Social Insurance Institution of Finland for providing us the additional route of case recruitment.
Human Participant Protection
The ethics committees of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health and the Tampere University Hospital approved the study. Participants provided informed consent.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 17, 2002.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSReferences |
|---|
2. Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997;50:307–364.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Strachan DP, Cook DG. Parental smoking and childhood asthma: longitudinal and case-control studies. Thorax. 1998;53:204–212.
4. Jaakkola MS. Environmental tobacco smoke and respiratory diseases. Eur Respir Monogr. 2000;15:322–383.
5. Jaakkola MS, Jaakkola JJK. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on the respiratory health of adults. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28(suppl 2):54–72.
6. Greer JR, Abbey DE, Burchette RJ. Asthma related to occupational and ambient air pollutants in nonsmokers. J Occup Med. 1993;35:909–915.[Web of Science][Medline]
7. Ng TP, Hui KP, Wan CT. Respiratory symptoms and lung function effects of domestic exposure to tobacco smoke and cooking by gas in non-smoking women in Singapore. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47:454–459.
8. Leuenberger P, Schwartz J, Ackermann-Liebrich U, et al. Passive smoking exposure in adults and chronic respiratory symptoms (SAPALDIA Study). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:1222–1228.[Abstract]
9. Flodin U, Jönsson P, Ziepgler J, Axelson O. An epidemiologic study of bronchial asthma and smoking. Epidemiology. 1995;6:503–505.[Web of Science][Medline]
10. Hu FB, Persky V, Flay BR, Richardson J. An epidemiological study of asthma prevalence and related factors among young adults. J Asthma. 1997;34:67–76.[Web of Science][Medline]
11. Thorn J, Brisman J, Torén K. Adult-onset asthma is associated with self-reported mold or environmental tobacco smoke exposures in the home. Allergy. 2001;56:282–292.
12. Robbins AS, Abbey DE, Lebowitz MD. Passive smoking and chronic respiratory symptoms in non-smoking adults. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:809–817.
13. Jaakkola MS, Nordman H, Piipari R, et al. Indoor dampness and molds and development of adult-onset asthma: a population-based incident case-control study. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:543–547.[Web of Science][Medline]
14. Committee on National Asthma Program in Finland. Asthma Program 1994–2004 [in Finnish]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 1994. 16.
15. Jaakkola JJK, Miettinen P. Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:755–765.
16. Jaakkola MS, Jaakkola JJK. Office equipment and supplies: a modern occupational health concern? Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1223–1228.
17. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1107–1136.[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Viljanen AA, Halttunen PK, Kreus K-E, Viljanen BC. Spirometric studies in nonsmoking, healthy adults. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1982;42(suppl 159):5–20.[Web of Science]
19. Greenland S. Applications of stratified analysis methods. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
20. Miettinen OS. Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol. 1974;99:325–332.
21. Jaakkola MS, Jaakkola JJK. Assessment of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2384–2397.[Abstract]
22. Jaakkola MS, Samet JM. Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and health risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(suppl 6):829–835.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P Sripaiboonkij, W Phanprasit, and M S Jaakkola Respiratory and skin effects of exposure to wood dust from the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2009; 66(7): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. D. Eisner Secondhand Smoke and Obstructive Lung Disease: A Causal Effect? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2009; 179(11): 973 - 974. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Sripaiboonkij, W. Phanprasit, and M. S. Jaakkola Respiratory effects of occupational exposures in a milk powder factory Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 807 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. T. Hugg, M. S. Jaakkola, R. O. Ruotsalainen, V. J. Pushkarev, and J. J.K. Jaakkola Parental smoking behaviour and effects of tobacco smoke on children's health in Finland and Russia Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 55 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Stark, K. Rohde, J. E. Maher, B. A. Pizacani, C. W. Dent, R. Bard, S. G. Carmella, A. R. Benoit, N. M. Thomson, and S. S. Hecht The Impact of Clean Indoor Air Exemptions and Preemption Policies on the Prevalence of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen Among Nonsmoking Bar and Restaurant Workers Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1457 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. T. C. Okoli, L. A. Hall, M. K. Rayens, and E. J. Hahn Measuring Tobacco Smoke Exposure Among Smoking and Nonsmoking Bar and Restaurant Workers Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2007; 9(1): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S Jaakkola, L. Yang, A. Ieromnimon, and J. J K Jaakkola Office work exposures and respiratory and sick building syndrome symptoms Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2007; 64(3): 178 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. K. Jaakkola, A. Ieromnimon, and M. S. Jaakkola Interior Surface Materials and Asthma in Adults: A Population-based Incident Case-Control Study Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2006; 164(8): 742 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Jaakkola and J. J. K. Jaakkola Impact of smoke-free workplace legislation on exposures and health: possibilities for prevention. Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 397 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Skogstad, K Kjaerheim, G Fladseth, M Gjolstad, H L Daae, R Olsen, P Molander, and D G Ellingsen Cross shift changes in lung function among bar and restaurant workers before and after implementation of a smoking ban Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2006; 63(7): 482 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T M L Eagan, J Hetland, and L E Aaro Decline in respiratory symptoms in service workers five months after a public smoking ban Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 242 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y.-L. Lee, T.-R. Hsiue, C.-H. Lee, H.-J. J. Su, and Y. Leon Guo Home exposures, parental atopy, and occurrence of asthma symptoms in adulthood in southern taiwan. Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Piipari, J.J.K. Jaakkola, N. Jaakkola, and M.S. Jaakkola Smoking and asthma in adults Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2004; 24(5): 734 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.C. Thomson, R. Chaudhuri, and E. Livingston Asthma and cigarette smoking Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2004; 24(5): 822 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.T. McNicholas Controlling passive smoking through legislation in Ireland: an attack on civil liberty or good public health policy? Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2004; 24(3): 337 - 338. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
