|
|
||||||||
EDITORIAL |
Deborah Zahn is with the Community Voices Project, Sherry Hirota is with Asian Health Services, and Jane Garcia is with La Clínica de La Raza, all in Oakland, Calif. Marguerite J. Ro is with the SDOS Division of Community Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, and is a consultant for The W. K. Kellogg Foundations Community Voices Initiative.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Deborah Zahn, MPH, Community Voices Project, 1320 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 250, Alameda, CA 94502 (e-mail: dzahn{at}chcn-eb.org).
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Through a series of innovations in Alameda County, California, we have taken and continue to take advantage of every opportunity to align our familycentered values with our programs and policies. In Alameda County alone, there are an estimated 162 000 people without health coverage. Of these, 15 000 are children. More than half of the uninsured adults are immigrants.1,2 Our programmatic and policy efforts are designed to be responsive to all families and family members in our diverse communities in Alameda County. We have sought to create a broad range of support for families, and we have moved our county forward in creating seamless systems that put families and their multiple needs at the center of our efforts.
| ALLIANCE FAMILY CAREFILLING THE GAP IN HEALTH COVERAGE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The impact of Alliance Family Care has been profound, as measured by standard health and insurance benchmarks. Membership has far exceeded expectations as more than 7300 family members have enrolled over 3 years. The retention percentage at the last annual renewal exceeded 97%. Preliminary results from the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS)a set of standardized performance measures for managed care plansare encouraging. In 2002, child immunization coverage for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) was 80%, children aged 3 to 6 years enrolled in Alliance Family Care were more likely to visit primary care providers for prevention than similarly aged children enrolled in Medi-Cal, and more than 70% of members with diabetes were screened for renal disease and monitored by means of hemoglobin A1C assays.
| NO WRONG DOORAN INCLUSIVE ENROLLMENT POLICY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| KEEPING FAMILIES HEALTHY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although we have achieved documented success in Alameda County, there are other pressing issues that must be dealt with if we are to live up to our claim of valuing families. The notion of a family as restricted to a nuclear family comprising a father, a mother, and children is not a true reflection of reality. When we ask our community members what constitutes a family and examine caregiving among families, we see a great diversity of family structures, including extended families living in a single residence, grandparents raising grandchildren, and parents caring for adult family members. Of course, this has been true in the past as it is today.
| DIVERSE FAMILY STRUCTURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The challenges families face in caring for all their membersgrandparents, children, and ailing family membersare substantial. Even when programs and policies do emphasize families, they are rarely aligned with the diversity of family structures.
Nonetheless, certain workplaces are beginning to make the necessary changes to accommodate these structures. Our health and social services systems must follow suit. We also must face the reality that health and illness are family issues. The entire family is affected when one member does not have health care coverage or is sick. Efforts to provide coverage to family members must extend beyond children and pregnant women. Otherwise it assumes only heterosexual unions. Also, we cannot afford to leave men out of the health care equation, not only for the sake of our men but also for their families and our communities.
Recognition of the links between the health of adult family members and the health of their children helps providers to better understand the full range of factors contributing to the health of any individual client. Medical and health decisions are rarely made by individuals alone but are most often made in consultation with their families. Health behaviors are passed down from generation to generation.
| LESSONS LEARNED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Second, building flexibility into our systems would better ensure that they work for families. Having systems that "bend" would allow us to use what we know works and try out new approaches.
Third, we must create more opportunities to enroll families in health coverage programs. Our experience in Alameda County demonstrates that offering an affordable, comprehensive family coverage product and transforming the enrollment process means families will not only enroll but stay enrolled.
Fourth, we need adequate reimbursement for wraparound services and funded opportunities to step outside traditional health care boundaries.
Finally, we need to meaningfully evaluate and share successful models for providing family-centered health care. This is particularly important for populations, such as immigrants and communities of color, that have traditionally been discriminated against in health care systems and that continue to be underserved. Our model for family-centered health care in Alameda County has grown out of our valuing families and meeting them where they are. By linking our model with others that are developing across the nation, we seek to build a connected system that will fill existing gaps and better ensure respectful health care for all.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Dong Suh, MPP, policy and planning director, Asian Health Services, for providing input and Darouny Somsanith, MPH, research and policy associate, Community Voices ProjectAlameda County, California, for collecting data.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. California Health Interview Survey. AskCHIS [on-line searchable database]. Available at: http://www.chis.ucla.edu/main/default.asp. Accessed September 2003.
3. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Marital Status by Sex, UnmarriedPartner Households, and Grandparents as Caregivers. Available at: http://www.census.gov. Accessed September 12, 2003.
4. Family Caregiving in the U.S.: Findings From a National Survey. Bethesda, Md: National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP; June 1997.
5. In the Middle: A Report on Multicultural Boomers Coping with Family and Aging Issues. Washington, DC: AARP; July 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, November 15, 2003; 327(7424): 1176 - 1176. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |