|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Carey B. Maslow, Samuel R. Friedman, Theresa E. Perlis, and Russell Rockwell are with the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc, New York, NY. Don C. Des Jarlais is with Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Carey B. Maslow, DrPH, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc, 71 West 23rd St, New York, NY 10010(e-mail: carey.maslow{at}ndri.org).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives. This study examined HIV prevalence and risk behaviors among male injection drug users (IDUs) who have sex with men and among other male IDUs.
Methods. Male IDUs were interviewed and tested for HIV at a detoxification clinic during 1990 to 1994 and 1995 to 1999. Analyses compared male IDUs who do and do not have sex with men within and between periods.
Results. Initially, HIV seroprevalence and risk behaviors were higher among IDUs who have sex with men. Seroprevalence (initially 60.5% vs 48.3%) declined approximately 15% in both groups, remaining higher among those who have sex with men. Generally, injection prevalence, but not sexual risk behaviors, declined.
Conclusions. Male IDUs who have sex with men are more likely to engage in higher-risk behaviors and to be HIV infected. Improved intervention approaches for male IDUs who have sex with men are needed. (Am J Public Health. 2002;92:382384)
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In New York City, HIV seroprevalence,14,15 HIV seroincidence,16 and injection risk behaviors3,15 have declined among IDUs. Relatively little is known about differences between MSM IDUs and other male IDUs regarding trends in risk behaviors and HIV prevalence. This study examined trends in prevalent HIV infection and in injection risk behaviors among MSM IDUs and, comparatively, among other male IDUs between 1990 and 1999 in New York City.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects who reported having had sexual intercourse with another man during the 5 years preceding the interview were classified as MSM. Risk behaviors referred to the 6-month period preceding the interview. Trained interviewers administered a structured, face-to-face interview based on a modified version of the World Health Organization Multi-Centre Study of AIDS and Injecting Drug Use questionnaire.19 HIV counselors and phlebotomists provided pretest counseling before drawing blood. HIV-1 antibody replicate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing was performed on all samples; Western blot testing was performed on all enzyme-linked immunosorbent assayreactive and indeterminate samples.
Analyses
The period of observation was dichotomized into two 5-year intervals: 1990 to 1994 and 1995 to 1999. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare proportions and means, respectively, between MSM IDU and other male IDU groups, within and between time periods. Changes over time were analyzed by comparing the 2 time periods within and between MSM IDU and other male IDU groups. Cases without HIV results were retained in analyses of other relevant variables because proportions were similar between groups. Items that changed significantly between time periods in one or both groups were included in logistic regression models predicting HIV seropositivity as a function of group and period. All statistical analyses used SAS software.20
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nevertheless, this study highlighted important developments affecting the HIV epidemic in New York City. HIV prevalence and HIV risk behaviors have declined among MSM in general21 and among IDUs in general3,14; this paper shows that injection risk behaviors and HIV prevalence also have declined among MSM IDUs, who are at particularly high risk for infection.13 Declining seroprevalence among MSM IDUs may be partially attributable to the effects of intervention efforts targeting MSM, as well as IDU populations, although it appears that such interventions have primarily affected injection risk. Injection risk behaviors declined among the IDUs in this study, whereas sexual risk behaviors did not. Although condom use increased among other male IDUs, it did not increase among MSM IDUs.
Few intervention programs target MSM IDUs specifically. The potential benefit of such targeted programs is unclear; in fact, none of the MSM drug users interviewed by Rhodes et al.9 saw any benefit to separate programs based on sexual orientation. These interviewees did indicate (and these findings confirmed) the need for multidimensional interventions with heightened sensitivity to and awareness of sexual orientation. Whether this can best be achieved through improvements to existing interventions or by developing approaches specific to MSM IDUs requires further research. Given the high-risk profile of MSM IDUs, such approaches should be prioritized for implementation and assessment in the near future.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
National Development and Research Institutes research staff, including Martha Nelson, Martin Blasco, Eldon Garcia, Carole Johnson, Ivette Moloney, and the HIV Counseling and Testing Team of the Beth Israel Chemical Dependency Institute, assisted in gathering and processing data. We would especially like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the thousands of drug-injecting participants who answered questions and provided blood for analysis.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication February 23, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Jose B, Friedman SR, Neaigus A, et al. Syringe-mediated drug-sharing (backloading): a new risk factor for HIV among injecting drug-users. AIDS.1993;7:16531660.[Medline]
3. Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Perlis T, et al. Risk behavior and HIV infection among new drug injectors in the era of AIDS in New York City. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol.1999;20:6772.[Medline]
4. Deren S, Estrada A, Stark M, Williams M, Goldstein M. A multisite study of sexual orientation and injection drug use as predictors of HIV serostatus in out-of-treatment male drug users. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol.1997;15:289295.[Medline]
5. Wolitski R, Humfleet G, Lee J, Corby N. HIV risk-related practices of male homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual injection drug users. In: Program and abstracts of the VIII International Conference on AIDS; July 1924, 1992; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Abstract PoC 4267.
6. Friedman SR, Jose B, Deren S, Des Jarlais DC, Neaigus A, National AIDS Research Consortium. Risk factors for HIV seroconversion among out-of-treatment injectors in high- and low-seroprevalence cities. Am J Epidemiol.1995;8:864874.
7.
Siegal HA, Carlson RG, Falck R, et al. HIV infection and risk behaviors among intravenous drug users in low seroprevalence areas in the Midwest. Am J Public Health.1991;81:16421644.
8. Wood MM, Rhodes F, Malotte CK. Pilot study of drug-using men who have sex with men: access and intervention strategies. In: Program and abstracts of the XI International Conference on AIDS; July 712, 1996; Vancouver, British Columbia. Abstract Tu.C.2412.
9. Rhodes F, Deren S, Wood MM, et al. Understanding HIV risks of chronic drug-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 1999;11:629648.[Medline]
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report: U.S. HIV and AIDS Cases Reported Through June, 1999. Vol 11. Atlanta, Ga: Public Health Service; 1999.
11. Bull S, Piper P, Rietmeijer C. The relationship between sex, drugs, and condom use among men who have sex with men and also inject drugs (MSM-IDU) in Denver. In: Program and abstracts of the XII International Conference on AIDS; June 30, 1998; Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract 23406.
12. Stall R, Ostrow DG. Intravenous drug use, the combination of drugs and sexual activity and HIV infection among gay and bisexual men: The San Francisco Men's Health Study. J Drug Issues.1989;19:5773.
13. Rebchook G, McFarland W, Katz M, et al. When worlds collide: sex, needles, and HIV infection among young injection drug using men who have sex with men. In: Program and abstracts of the XII International Conference on AIDS; June 30, 1998; Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract 23104.
14.
Des Jarlais DC, Perlis T, Friedman SR, et al. Declining seroprevalence in a very large HIV epidemic: injecting drug users in New York City, 19911996. Am J Public Health.1998;88:18011806.
15. Friedman SR, Chapman TF, Perlis TE, et al. Similarities and differences by race/ethnicity in changes of HIV seroprevalence and related behaviors among drug injectors in New York City, 19911996. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr.1999;22:8391.
16.
Des Jarlais DC, Marmor M, Perlis T, et al. HIV incidence among injecting drug users in New York City, 19921997: evidence for a declining epidemic. Am J Public Health.2000;90:352359.
17. Battjes RJ, Pickens RW, Brown LS Jr. HIV infection and AIDS risk behaviors among injecting drug users entering methadone treatment: an update. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol.1995;10:9096.[Medline]
18. Onorato IM, Gwinn M, Dondero TJ Jr. Applications of data from the CDC Family of Surveys. Public Health Rep.1994;109:204211.[Medline]
19. Stimson GV, Des Jarlais DC, Ball AL, eds. Drug Injecting and HIV Infection: Global Dimensions and Local Responses. London, England: UCL Press; 1998.
20. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1993.
21. Gay Men's Health Crisis. Sexual Health and Practices of Gay, Bisexual and Homosexually Active Men in New York City. New York, NY: Gay Men's Health Crisis; June 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Hariri and M. T. McKenna Epidemiology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the United States Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 20(3): 478 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Rothenberg Maintenance of endemicity in urban environments: a hypothesis linking risk, network structure and geography Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2007; 83(1): 10 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Des Jarlais, T. Perlis, K. Arasteh, L. V. Torian, S. Beatrice, J. Milliken, D. Mildvan, S. Yancovitz, and S. R. Friedman HIV Incidence Among Injection Drug Users in New York City, 1990 to 2002: Use of Serologic Test Algorithm to Assess Expansion of HIV Prevention Services Am J Public Health, August 1, 2005; 95(8): 1439 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
HIV Diagnoses Among Injection-Drug Users in States With HIV Surveillance--25 States, 1994-2000 JAMA, August 13, 2003; 290(6): 743 - 747. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |