|
|
||||||||
HEALTH POLICY & ETHICS FORUM |
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Raymond R. Arons, DrPH, MPH, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 600 W 168th St, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: rra1{at}columbia.edu).
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The concepts Riegelman and Persily present have more than 30 years' historical support.13 Their position is further strengthened by the technologic revolution of the past decade. At present, relatively low-cost and powerful personal computers (PCs) and PC-based statistical research packages may be used to access databases from private, state, and federal agencies.46 These databases include health care encounters at the patient level and individual responses to national surveys of, for example, nutrition and health. Census data are readily available on the Internet, albeit in formats that require training to use and interpret meaningfully.
| A COURSE IN POINT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The course is not limited to students majoring in epidemiology or biostatistics. Indeed, students from the other 4 divisions at the Mailman School of Public Health (sociomedical sciences, environmental health sciences, population and family health, health policy and management) have completed the course, as have students from the schools of medicine, dentistry, nursing, social work, and international affairs.
Students in this course receive 8 weeks of hands-on computer experience, followed by 6 weeks of conducting an analysis project of their own choosing. Over the course of the semester, students hone their computer, data analysis, and statistical skills while gaining familiarity with the research interests of their classmates and faculty. Frameworks for conceptualizing research questions are considered as fundamentally important as the technologic skills gained, and during the course we critically analyze the way in which the chosen frameworks influence the results obtained and the attendant interpretations.
Following the goals and objectives outlined by Riegelman and Persily, a student may pose a particular research question regarding, say, bone densities in older adults. Do older African American women have higher bone densities than older White women? How do the bone densities of older adults born abroad differ from the bone densities of older adults born in the United States? How does the current body mass index of older adults relate to their measured bone densities? To answer such questions, a student may choose to work with the most recent National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES III).7 After writing lines of code to specify the analysis of interest, the student places the corresponding CD-ROM containing 260 million weighted patient interviews in the computer's CD drive.
Thorough analysis and thoughtful interpretation of the results obtained may take more time than allotted during the semester. Thus, students are encouraged to continue their exploration outside the confines of the classroom. Most students select analysis questions of immediate research interest or drawn from personal experience. This helps provide a fuller context within which to place the findings obtained.
| THE BASICS OF LARGE-SCALE DATA ANALYSIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| THE DESIRED OUTCOME |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To facilitate this fundamental change in the core curriculum, significant financial commitments are needed in the form of computer laboratories, faculty support, and strengthening of data repositories. If future health practitioners and researchers are to advance the public's health, they must be equipped with the technical skills and tools needed to help reduce suffering, cure illness, and promote health for all.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication April 6, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Murnaghan JH, White KL. Hospital discharge data: report of the conference on hospital discharge abstracts systems held at Airlie House, Warrenton, Virginia. Med Care. 1970;8(4 suppl):111.[Medline]
3. Eng TR, Gustafson DH, eds. Wired for Health and Well-Being: The Emergence of Interactive Health Communication. Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1999.
4. Arons RR. The New Economics of Health Care: DRGs, Case Mix, and Length of Stay. New York: Praeger Publishers; 1984.
5. National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1992. Public use data tape documentation. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994. Available at: http://www.ntis.gov. Accessed May 29, 2001. National Technical Information Service No. PB94141736.
6. SPARCS Inpatient Output Data Dictionary. Albany: New York State Department of Health; 2000.
7. Data User Support Group. 1996 discharge data tape format documentation. Sacramento: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, State of California; 1997.
8. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Fact Sheet. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1999. Publication 90026.
9. Woodwell DA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 Summary. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1999. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 305.
10.
Sorlie PD, Backlund E, Keller JB. US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Am J Public Health.1995;85:949956.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |