AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 30, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.127977v1
98/3/388    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leistikow, B. N.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leistikow, B. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco Control
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Right arrow Other Tobacco
March 2008, Vol 98, No. 3 | American Journal of Public Health 388-389
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127977


LETTER

LEISTIKOW RESPONDS

Bruce N. Leistikow, MD, MS

The author is with the Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Bruce N. Leistikow, MD, Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 (e-mail: bnleistikow@ucdavis.edu).

Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

The recent article by Franks et al.1 in the Journal did not mention 5 relevant facts regarding the cost of cigarettes. First, cigarettes deliver an estimated $40 in combined personal and societal harm per pack, so most cigarette prices must rise over 1000% before smoker expenditures equal harms from each pack smoked.2 Second, given the high harm per pack, the observed recent cigarette pack price elasticity (i.e., the change in percentage of smokers relative to a 1% change in cigarette pack price) of –0.14 for the lowest income quartile1 seems fairly clinically significant, albeit less statistically significant.1 So, for the . . . [Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association