AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorman, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gorman, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Health
Right arrow School Health
Right arrow Prevention
April 2007, Vol 97, No. 4 | American Journal of Public Health 595-600
© 2007 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097261


ON THE OTHER HAND

Changing Service Systems for High-Risk Youth Using State-Level Strategies

Dennis M. Gorman, PhD

Dennis M. Gorman is with the Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Dennis M. Gorman, PhD, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, TAMU 1266, College Station, TX 77843-1266 (e-mail: gorman@srph.tamhsc.edu).

Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

ALTHOUGH FRANKFORD HAS identified important problems in prevention and positive youth development, there are at least 2 concerns about the type of positive youth development framework proposed. First, a broad analysis of youth development provides only a starting point for understanding the etiology and course of adolescent problem behaviors and the development of effective interventions. Second, a focus on positive youth development may not provide the basis for a truly public health approach because it may be tied to strategies that "fix" or "inoculate" individuals through participation in inter-and intrapersonal prevention programs, rather than promote strategies to strengthen the broader . . . [Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association