|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LETTER |
Steven H. Woolf is with the Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, and the Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Robert E. Johnson is with the Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, and the Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH, Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, West Hospital, 1200 East Broad Street, P.O. Box 980251, MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298-0251 (e-mail: swoolf@vcu.edu).
|
|||
Leroy et al.1 examined what we call the fidelity of health care delivery, the extent to which the system provides patients with the interventions they need, delivered properly and precisely when they need them.2 According to their analysis of interventions for children in 42 low-income countries, improving fidelity rather than the technology of care (e.g., new drugs) would save almost 3 times as many lives. They reported that research on child mortality in developing countries deals overwhelmingly with technological advances, giving comparatively little attention to delivery and utilization.1
This imbalance is hardly unique to developing countries. We reached the same
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |