|
|
||||||||
LETTER |
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Chandra L. Ford, PhD, MPH, MLIS, 378-A Wing D, Department of Social Medicine, CB# 7240 School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 275997240 (e-mail: chandra_ford@med.unc.edu).
|
|||
In the July issue of the Journal, Young and Meyer1 describe how research targeting sexual minorities often relies upon the terms "men who have sex with men (MSM)" and "women who have sex with women (WSW)" in ways that elide important social considerations. The authors provide recommendations that are potentially quite useful, and they implore researchers to "aim for a deeper understanding of variations in the meaning of sexual identity and community."1(p1149) I wholeheartedly agree with the intent of their recommendations, but it is unclear how researchers could implement those recommendations without first addressing the social context within which public
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Lee, L. St Leger, F. F. K. Cheng, and Hong Kong Healthy Schools Team The status of health-promoting schools in Hong Kong and implications for further development Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2007; 22(4): 316 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Young and I. H. Meyer YOUNG AND MEYER RESPOND Am J Public Health, May 1, 2006; 96(5): 766 - 766. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |