|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Practice |
1 University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health
2 University of Pittsburgh, Center for Injury Research and Control
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mertzk{at}edc.pitt.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
To evaluate the 2003 repeal of Pennsylvanias motorcycle helmet law, we assessed changes in helmet use and compared motorcycle-related head injuries with nonhead injuries from 2001–2002 to 2004–2005. Helmet use among riders in crashes decreased from 82% to 58%. Head injury deaths increased 66%; nonhead injury deaths increased 25%. Motorcycle-related head injury hospitalizations increased 78% compared with 28% for nonhead injury hospitalizations. Helmet law repeals jeopardize motorcycle riders. Until repeals are reversed, states need voluntary strategies to increase helmet use.
Key Words: Epidemiology, Injury/Emergency Care/Violence, Mortality
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. T. Bryan, R. M. Schaefer, L. DeBruyn, and D. D. Stier Public Health Legal Preparedness in Indian Country Am J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 99(4): 607 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
News and notes Inj. Prev., October 1, 2008; 14(5): 338 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |