AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Apr 5, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.096453v1
97/Supplement_1/S163    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shalauta Juzych, N.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shalauta Juzych, N.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. A.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2006.096453


Research and Practice

Adequacy of State Capacity to Address Noncommunicable Disease Clusters in the Era of Environmental Public Health Tracking

Nadia Shalauta Juzych 1*, Beth Resnick 2, Robin Streeter 2, Julie Herbstman 2, Joanna Zablotsky 2, Mary Fox 2, Thomas A. Burke 2

1 Michigan Public Health Institute
2 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: njuzych{at}med.wayne.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We sought to assess the capacity of state public health agencies to address noncommunicable disease clusters (NCCs) and to develop recommendations to enhance agencies’ NCC response capacity.

Methods. We conducted an inventory of state public health agency Web sites and administered a Web-based survey of state health agency personnel to examine NCC capacity with respect to responsibility and authority, scope, protocols, trends in NCC investigations, and desired assistance.

Results. Twenty-six of the state agency Web sites listed an NCC contact, and 12 mentioned a cluster response team. Thirty-seven states completed the Web-based survey, all addressed cancer clusters, and 30 also responded to other NCCs, such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and autism.

Conclusions. NCCs are of key concern to communities, and all of the survey respondents indicated that citizen reports were an impetus for investigations; yet, state-level capacity to address NCCs was inconsistent and disjointed. State agency personnel were committed to responding to NCC inquiries but were hampered by lack of personnel, resources, and prescribed protocols, as well as inadequate interagency communication. We offer recommendations to address these challenges.

Key Words: Community Health, Environment, Public Health Practice, Surveillance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association