AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.074385v1
96/11/1949    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houston, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, Jr., L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houston, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, Jr., L. E.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.074385

Government, Politics, and Law

Safety Belt Use and the Switch to Primary Enforcement, 1991-2003

David J. Houston 1* Lilliard E. Richardson, Jr. 2

1 University of Tennessee, Knoxville
2 University of Missouri, Columbia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dhouston{at}utk.edu.


  Abstract

State seat belt laws have increased use rates and have reduced traffic fatalities, but tremendous variation exists in the laws. New Hampshire does not have a law, and 30 states have only secondary enforcement laws. Whereas primary enforcement allows an officer to issue a citation for any infraction, secondary enforcement permits a citation only if a motorist is stopped for another infraction first.

We performed a cross-sectional time-series analysis of the impact of upgrading to primary enforcement on belt use rates for 47 states and the District of Columbia from 1991 to 2003. Our results suggest that states with secondary enforcement laws could increase belt use by 10 percentage points and improve public safety considerably by upgrading to primary enforcement.

Key Words: Government, Health Policy, Injury/Emergency Care/Violence, Social Science, Statistics/Evaluation/Research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PubliusHome page
L. E. Richardson Jr. and D. J. Houston
Federalism and Safety on America's Highways
Publius, December 1, 2009; 39(1): 117 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. E. Wesson, D. Stephens, K. Lam, D. Parsons, L. Spence, and P. C. Parkin
Trends in Pediatric and Adult Bicycling Deaths Before and After Passage of a Bicycle Helmet Law
Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 122(3): 605 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association