AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jun 29, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.069617v1
96/8/1359    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alamar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alamar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S. A.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617

Health Policy and Ethics

Effect of Increased Social Unacceptability of Cigarette Smoking on Reduction in Cigarette Consumption

Benjamin Alamar 1 Stanton A. Glantz 1*

1 University of California San Francisco

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.


  Abstract

Taxes on cigarettes have long been used to help reduce cigarette consumption. Social factors also affect cigarette consumption, but this impact has not been quantified. We computed a social unacceptability index based on individuals' responses to questions regarding locations where smoking should be allowed.

A regression analysis showed that the social unacceptability index and price had similar elasticities and that their effects were independent of each other. If, through an active tobacco control campaign, the average individual's views on the social unacceptability of smoking changed to more closely resemble the views of California residents, there would be a 15% drop in cigarette consumption, equivalent to a $1.17 increase in the excise tax on cigarettes.

Key Words: Environmental Tobacco Smoke, Tobacco Control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
W. L. Hamilton, L. Biener, and R. T. Brennan
Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2008; 23(4): 709 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
J. S. Vernick, L. Rutkow, and S. P. Teret
Public Health Benefits of Recent Litigation Against the Tobacco Industry
JAMA, July 4, 2007; 298(1): 86 - 89.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
S. Chapman
Evidence, ethics, hubris and the future of second-hand smoke policy
Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 73 - 74.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br Med BullHome page
R. West
Tobacco control: present and future
Br. Med. Bull., November 14, 2006; (2006) ldl012v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association