Jack S. Blocker ^1*

¹ Huron University College, University of Western Ontario

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jblocker{at}uwo.ca.

	Abstract

The conventional view that National Prohibition failed rests upon an historically flimsy base. The successful campaign to enact National Prohibition was the fruit of a century-long temperance campaign, experience of which led prohibitionists to conclude that a nationwide ban on alcohol was the most promising of the many strategies tried thus far. A sharp rise in consumption during the early 20th century seemed to confirm the bankruptcy of alternative alcohol-control programs. The stringent prohibition imposed by the Volstead Act, however, represented a more drastic action than many Americans expected. Nevertheless, National Prohibition succeeded both in lowering consumption and in retaining political support until the onset of the Great Depression radically changed the historical altered voters' priorities. Repeal resulted more from this contextual shift than from characteristics of the innovation itself.

Key Words: History, Alcohol, Substance Abuse

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. Greenberg The Diffusion of Public Health Innovations Am J Public Health, February 1, 2006; 96(2): 209 - 210. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: