HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2007.128991v1 98/8/1443    most recent Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Wakefield, M. A. Articles by Hill, D. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wakefield, M. A. Articles by Hill, D. Related Collections Health Policy Media Surveys Tobacco Control

Melanie A. Wakefield, PhD, Sarah Durkin, PhD, Matthew J. Spittal, PhD, Mohammad Siahpush, PhD, Michelle Scollo, Dip. Comm Health, Julie A. Simpson, PhD, Simon Chapman, PhD, Victoria White, PhD and David Hill, PhD

Melanie A. Wakefield, Sarah Durkin, Matthew J. Spittal, Victoria White, and David Hill are with the Centre for Behavioral Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Mohammad Siahpush is with the Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Michelle Scollo is with the Tobacco Control Unit, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne. Julie A. Simpson is with the Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne. Simon Chapman is with the School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Melanie A. Wakefield, PhD, Centre for Behavioral Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia (e-mail: melanie.wakefield{at}cancervic.org.au).

ABSTRACT

Objectives. We sought to assess the impact of several tobacco control policies and televised antismoking advertising on adult smoking prevalence.

Methods. We used a population survey in which smoking prevalence was measured each month from 1995 through 2006. Time-series analysis assessed the effect on smoking prevalence of televised antismoking advertising (with gross audience rating points [GRPs] per month), cigarette costliness, monthly sales of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion, and smoke-free restaurant laws.

Results. Increases in cigarette costliness and exposure to tobacco control media campaigns significantly reduced smoking prevalence. We found a 0.3-percentage-point reduction in smoking prevalence by either exposing the population to televised antismoking ads an average of almost 4 times per month (390 GRPs) or by increasing the costliness of a pack of cigarettes by 0.03% of gross average weekly earnings. Monthly sales of NRT and bupropion, exposure to NRT advertising, and smoke-free restaurant laws had no detectable impact on smoking prevalence.

Conclusions. Increases in the real price of cigarettes and tobacco control mass media campaigns broadcast at sufficient exposure levels and at regular intervals are critical for reducing population smoking prevalence.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S F Hurley and J P Matthews Cost-effectiveness of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign Tob. Control, December 1, 2008; 17(6): 379 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]