AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jul 31, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.093302v1
AJPH.2006.093302v2
98/4/680    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, P.
April 2008, Vol 98, No. 4 | American Journal of Public Health 680-686
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093302


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Indoor Risk Factors for Cough and Their Relation to Wheeze and Sensitization in Chilean Young Adults

James F. Potts, Roberto J. Rona, MD, PhD, FFPH, Manuel J. Oyarzun, MD, Hugo Amigo, DMD, DrPH, MPH and Patricia Bustos, MD

At the time of this study, James F. Potts and Roberto J. Rona were with the Department of Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, England. Manuel J. Oyarzun is with the Institute of Bio-Medical Science, University of Chile, Santiago. Hugo Amigo and Patricia Bustos are with the Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to James F. Potts, Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, Emmanuel Kaye Building, Manresa Rd, London SW3 6LR, England (e-mail: j.potts{at}imperial.ac.uk).

Objectives. We assessed the effects of indoor risk factors, including smoking, on different types of cough and on cough and wheeze in combination.

Methods. Our sample was composed of 1232 men and women residing in a semirural area of Chile. We used a standardized questionnaire, sensitization to 8 allergens, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine to assess cough and wheeze characteristics. Information was gathered on dampness, mold, ventilation, heating, housing quality, smoking, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure.

Results. Most exposures were associated with cough alone or cough in combination with wheeze. Smoking, past smoking, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure were strongly associated with dry cough and wheeze. The use of coal for heating was associated with dry cough. Leaks, mold, and lack of kitchen ventilation were associated with cough and wheeze. Nocturnal cough and productive cough were associated with specific types of sensitization, but dry cough was not. Productive cough was associated with hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.

Conclusions. Several different types of indoor exposures, including environmental tobacco smoke exposure, are important contributors to morbidity associated with cough and wheeze. A vigorous preventive strategy designed to lower exposures to indoor risk factors would lower rates of respiratory morbidity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association