AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Feb 28, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.123117v1
98/4/644    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Béhague, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Storeng, K. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Béhague, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Storeng, K. T.
April 2008, Vol 98, No. 4 | American Journal of Public Health 644-649
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123117


FRAMING HEALTH MATTERS

Collapsing the Vertical–Horizontal Divide: An Ethnographic Study of Evidence-Based Policymaking in Maternal Health

Dominique P. Béhague, PhD and Katerini T. Storeng, MSc

At the time of the study, Dominique P. Béhague and Katerini T. Storeng were with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Dominique P. Béhague, Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom (email: dominique.behague{at}lshtm.ac.uk).

Using the international maternal health field as a case study, we draw on ethnographic research to investigate how public health researchers and policy experts are responding to tensions between vertical and horizontal approaches to health improvement. Despite nominal support for an integrative health system approach, we found that competition for funds and international recognition pushes professionals toward vertical initiatives. We also highlight how research practices contribute to the dominance of vertical strategies and limit the success of evidence-based policymaking for strengthening health systems. Rather than support disease-and subfield-specific advocacy, the public health community urgently needs to engage in open dialogue regarding the international, academic, and donor-driven forces that drive professionals toward an exclusive interest in vertical programs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association