|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Ricardo J. Wray and Keri Jupka are with the Health Communication Research Laboratory, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO. Steven M. Becker and Sarah Middleton are with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham. Neil Henderson and Carson Henderson are with the Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Health Sciences Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. Deborah Glik and Allison Drury were with the Health and Media Research Group, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Elizabeth W. Mitchell is with the National Center for Health Marketing, Division of Emergency Communication, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ricardo J. Wray, PhD, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, 3545 Lafayette Avenue, Room 411, St. Louis, MO, 63104 (tel.: 314-977-4075, fax: 314-977-4016, e-mail: wray{at}slu.edu).
Objectives. We sought to better understand the challenges of communicating with the public about emerging health threats, particularly threats involving toxic chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive materials.
Methods. At the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium of investigative teams from 4 schools of public health. Over 2 years, the investigative teams conducted 79 focus group interviews with 884 participants and individual cognitive response interviews with 129 respondents, for a total sample of 1013 individuals. The investigative teams systematically compared their results with other published research in public health, risk communication, and emergency preparedness.
Results. We found limited public understanding of emerging biological, chemical, and radioactive materials threats and of the differences between them; demand for concrete, accurate, and consistent information about actions needed for protection of self and family; active information seeking from media, local authorities, and selected national sources; and areas in which current emergency messaging can be improved.
Conclusions. The public will respond to a threat situation by seeking protective information and taking self-protective action, underlining the critical role of effective communication in public health emergencies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G J. Rubin, R. Amlot, L. Page, and S. Wessely Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey BMJ, July 2, 2009; 339(jul02_3): b2651 - b2651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |