|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS |
Jill A. Jarvie is with the San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA. Ruth E. Malone is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ruth E. Malone, 3333 California St, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA 94118 (e-mail: ruth.malone{at}ucsf.edu).
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is a known cause of disease among nonsmokers, contributing to lung cancer, heart disease, and sudden infant death syndrome, as well as other diseases. In response to the growing body of scientific literature linking SHS with serious diseases, many countries, states, and cities have established policies mandating smoke-free public spaces. Yet thousands of children remain unprotected from exposure to SHS in private homes and cars.
New initiatives targeting SHS in these spaces have raised ethical questions about imposing constraints on private behavior. We reviewed legislation and court cases related to such initiatives and used a principlist approach to analyze the ethical implications of policies banning smoking in private cars and homes in which children are present.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Desapriya, K. Turcotte, S. Subzwari, and I. Pike SMOKING INSIDE VEHICLES SHOULD BE BANNED GLOBALLY Am J Public Health, July 1, 2009; 99(7): 1158 - 1159. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |