|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT, POLITICS, AND LAW |
The authors are with the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and the Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Global, University of California, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Lori R. Freedman, PhD, UCSF Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, 1330 Broadway Street, Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA 94110 (e-mail: freedmanl{at}obgyn.ucsf.edu).
As Catholic-owned hospitals merge with or take over other facilities, they impose restrictions on reproductive health services, including abortion and contraceptive services. Our interviews with US obstetrician–gynecologists working in Catholic-owned hospitals revealed that they are also restricted in managing miscarriages.
Catholic-owned hospital ethics committees denied approval of uterine evacuation while fetal heart tones were still present, forcing physicians to delay care or transport miscarrying patients to non–Catholic-owned facilities. Some physicians intentionally violated protocol because they felt patient safety was compromised.
Although Catholic doctrine officially deems abortion permissible to preserve the life of the woman, Catholic-owned hospital ethics committees differ in their interpretation of how much health risk constitutes a threat to a woman's life and therefore how much risk must be present before they approve the intervention.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Jones and T. A. Weitz Legal Barriers to Second-Trimester Abortion Provision and Public Health Consequences Am J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 99(4): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
When Religious Ethics Conflict with Medical Standards of Miscarriage Management Journal Watch Women's Health, December 4, 2008; 2008(1204): 7 - 7. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |