AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Apr 5, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.077305v1
97/Supplement_1/S44    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bensimon, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Upshur, R. E.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bensimon, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Upshur, R. E.G.
April 2007, Vol 97, No. Supplement_1 | American Journal of Public Health S44-S48
© 2007 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.077305


GOVERNMENT, POLITICS, AND LAW

Evidence and Effectiveness in Decisionmaking for Quarantine

Cécile M. Bensimon, PhD, MA and Ross E.G. Upshur, MD, MA, MSc, FRCPC

Cécile M. Bensimon is with the Joint Centre for Bioethics and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, and the Primary Care Research Unit at Sunnybrook, Toronto. Ross E. G. Upshur is with the Joint Centre for Bioethics, and the Departments of Family and Community Medicine and Public Health Sciences Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, and the Primary Care Research Unit at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ross Upshur, Primary Care Research Unit at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room E3-49, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3N5 Canada (e-mail: ross.upshur{at}sunnybrook.ca)

When public health decisionmakers turned to quarantine during the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic, difficult questions were raised about the legitimacy and acceptability of restrictive measures to attain public health goals. SARS also brought to light how scientific uncertainty can permeate public health decisionmaking, leading us to think about the relationship between the adequacy of evidence of the effectiveness of an intervention and its role in the justification of public health action.

In this article, we critically examine the role of evidence and effectiveness in decision-making for quarantine. It is our contention that the effectiveness of a public health intervention should not be defined exclusively in (absolute and objective) scientific terms but rather conceptualized relationally and normatively in public health decisionmaking.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association