|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PUBLIC HEALTH THEN AND NOW |
Jennifer K. Ibrahim is with the Department of Public Health at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa. Stanton A. Glantz is with the School of Medicine and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jennifer K. Ibrahim, PhD, Temple University, 1700 N Broad St, Rm 304D, Philadelphia, PA 19122 (e-mail: jibrahim{at}temple.edu).
Extensive research has demonstrated that public education through media campaigns is an effective means to reduce smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Aggressive media campaigns that confront the tobacco industrys deceptive practices are most effective and are therefore a prime target for attack. The tobacco industry has attacked public tobacco control media campaigns since 1967, when the first public tobacco control media advertisements ran.
Through studying tobacco control media campaigns in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Oregon, and of the American Legacy Foundation, we identified industry strategies to prevent a campaigns creation, limit the target audience and the content of the messages, limit or eliminate the campaigns funding, and pursue litigation against the campaigns.
Tobacco control advocates must learn from the past and continue to confront the tobacco industry and its third-party allies to defend antitobacco media campaigns or, despite evidence of their effectiveness, they will be eliminated.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |